Imaging Sci Dent.  2025 Mar;55(1):65-71. 10.5624/isd.20240196.

Impact of an intraoral X-ray cone with positioning laser lights on reducing radiographic errors with the bisecting angle technique: A technical report

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
  • 2Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India
  • 3Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Pealing Jaya, Malaysia
  • 4Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
  • 5Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Purpose
The bisecting angle technique (BAT) encounters difficulties in positioning the X-ray cone and aligning the central beam with the tooth. To address this, a rectangular laser featuring a pointed light was integrated into the intraoral X-ray cone. This study evaluated its effectiveness in improving radiograph quality and minimizing errors.
Materials and Methods
Fifty fifth-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery students were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 16) used the paralleling technique, group 2 (n = 17) employed the conventional BAT, and group 3 (n = 17) utilized the laser-assisted BAT on mannequins. Two independent oral radiologists assessed the quality of the radiographs, categorizing the images as either diagnostically acceptable or not acceptable. Inter-group comparisons of quality and error rates were conducted using the chi-square test (significance level: P<0.05).
Results
The paralleling technique group produced 77.5% diagnostically acceptable radiographs and 22.5% that were not diagnostically acceptable. These percentages were 65.3% and 34.7%, respectively, in the conventional BAT group and 75.3% and 24.7%, respectively, in the laser-assisted BAT group, showing results similar to the paralleling technique group. The quality of radiographs differed significantly among the groups (P<0.05). The percentage of error-free radiographs was 38.1% in the paralleling technique group, 20.6% in the conventional BAT group, and 40.0% in the laser-assisted BAT group, with these differences being statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion
The device produced higher acceptability and fewer radiographic errors than the conventional BAT technique, suggesting accurate adjustment of the X-ray cone and central beam to the desired teeth.

Keyword

Dental Radiography; Lasers; Technique, X-rays
Full Text Links
  • ISD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr