Healthc Inform Res.  2025 Jan;31(1):23-36. 10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.23.

Triage Data-Driven Prediction Models for Hospital Admission of Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
  • 1College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 2College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
Emergency department (ED) overcrowding significantly impacts healthcare efficiency, safety, and resource management. Predictive models that utilize triage information can streamline the admission process. This review evaluates existing hospital admission prediction models that have been developed or validated using triage data for adult ED patients.
Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies were selected if they developed or validated predictive models for hospital admission using triage data from adult ED patients. Data extraction adhered to the CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies), and the risk of bias was evaluated using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool).
Results
Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, employing logistic regression and machine learning techniques. Logistic regression was noted for its traditional use and clinical interpretability, whereas machine learning provided enhanced flexibility and potential for better predictive accuracy. Common predictors included patient demographics, triage category, vital signs, and mode of arrival. The area under the curve values for model performance ranged from 0.80 to 0.89, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability. However, external validation was limited, and there was variability in outcome definitions and model generalizability.
Conclusions
Predictive models based on triage data show promise in supporting ED operations by facilitating early predictions of hospital admissions, which could help decrease boarding times and enhance patient flow. Further research is necessary to validate these models in various settings to confirm their applicability and reliability.

Keyword

Admission, Hospitalization, Prognosis, Emergencies, Triage

Figure

  • Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart of study selection process.


Reference

References

1. Chen W, Linthicum B, Argon NT, Bohrmann T, Lopiano K, Mehrotra A, et al. The effects of emergency department crowding on triage and hospital admission decisions. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38(4):774–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.039.
Article
2. Cusido J, Comalrena J, Alavi H, Llunas L. Predicting hospital admissions to reduce crowding in the emergency departments. Appl Sci. 2022; 12(21):10764. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110764.
Article
3. Dinh MM, Russell SB, Bein KJ, Rogers K, Muscatello D, Paoloni R, et al. The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: a derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia. BMC Emerg Med. 2016; 16(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0111-4.
Article
4. Zhang X, Kim J, Patzer RE, Pitts SR, Patzer A, Schrager JD. Prediction of emergency department hospital admission based on natural language processing and neural networks. Methods Inf Med. 2017; 56(5):377–89. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME17-01-0024.
Article
5. Jones D, Cameron A, Lowe DJ, Mason SM, O’Keeffe CA, Logan E. Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(8):e026599. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026599.
Article
6. Ebker-White AA, Bein KJ, Dinh MM. The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START): a prospective validation study. Emerg Med Australas. 2018; 30(4):511–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12940.
Article
7. Araz OM, Olson D, Ramirez-Nafarrate A. Predictive analytics for hospital admissions from the emergency department using triage information. Int J Prod Econ. 2019; 208:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.024.
Article
8. Parker CA, Liu N, Wu SX, Shen Y, Lam SS, Ong ME. Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: a novel prediction model. Am J Emerg Med. 2019; 37(8):1498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060.
9. Sun Y, Heng BH, Tay SY, Seow E. Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18(8):844–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01125.x.
Article
10. Brink A, Alsma J, van Attekum LA, Bramer WM, Zietse R, Lingsma H, et al. Predicting inhospital admission at the emergency department: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2022; 39(3):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210902.
Article
11. Larburu N, Azkue L, Kerexeta J. Predicting hospital ward admission from the emergency department: a systematic review. J Pers Med. 2023; 13(5):849. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050849.
Article
12. Sanchez-Salmeron R, Gomez-Urquiza JL, Albendin-Garcia L, Correa-Rodriguez M, Martos-Cabrera MB, Velando-Soriano A, et al. Machine learning methods applied to triage in emergency services: a systematic review. Int Emerg Nurs. 2022; 60:101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101109.
13. Fernandes M, Vieira SM, Leite F, Palos C, Finkelstein S, Sousa JM. Clinical decision support systems for triage in the emergency department using intelligent systems: a review. Artif Intell Med. 2020; 102:101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101762.
Article
14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Article
15. Moons KG, de Groot JA, Bouwmeester W, Vergouwe Y, Mallett S, Altman DG, et al. Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(10):e1001744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744.
Article
16. Wolff RF, Moons KG, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, et al. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(1):51–8. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1376.
17. Ebker-White A, Bein KJ, Dinh MM. Extending the Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START+) to predict discharges and short stay admissions. Emerg Med J. 2018; 35(8):471–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207227.
Article
18. Peck JS, Gaehde SA, Nightingale DJ, Gelman DY, Huckins DS, Lemons MF, et al. Generalizability of a simple approach for predicting hospital admission from an emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20(11):1156–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12244.
Article
19. Xie F, Zhou J, Lee JW, Tan M, Li S, Rajnthern LS, et al. Benchmarking emergency department prediction models with machine learning and public electronic health records. Sci Data. 2022; 9(1):658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01782-9.
Article
20. Levin S, Toerper M, Hamrock E, Hinson JS, Barnes S, Gardner H, et al. Machine-learning-based electronic triage more accurately differentiates patients with respect to clinical outcomes compared with the emergency severity index. Ann Emerg Med. 2018; 71(5):565–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.005.
21. Raita Y, Goto T, Faridi MK, Brown DF, Camargo CA Jr, Hasegawa K. Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models. Crit Care. 2019; 23(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
22. Tschoellitsch T, Seidl P, Bock C, Maletzky A, Moser P, Thumfart S, et al. Using emergency department triage for machine learning-based admission and mortality prediction. Eur J Emerg Med. 2023; 30(6):408–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001068.
23. Cameron A, Rodgers K, Ireland A, Jamdar R, McKay GA. A simple tool to predict admission at the time of triage. Emerg Med J. 2015; 32(3):174–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203200.
24. Handly N, Thompson DA, Li J, Chuirazzi DM, Venkat A. Evaluation of a hospital admission prediction model adding coded chief complaint data using neural network methodology. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015; 22(2):87–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000126.
25. Peck JS, Benneyan JC, Nightingale DJ, Gaehde SA. Predicting emergency department inpatient admissions to improve same-day patient flow. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19(9):E1045–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01435.x.
26. Rendell K, Koprinska I, Kyme A, Ebker-White AA, Dinh MM. The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START2) using machine learning techniques to support disposition decision-making. Emerg Med Australas. 2019; 31(3):429–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13199.
27. Graham B, Bond R, Quinn M, Mulvenna M. Using data mining to predict hospital admissions from the emergency department. IEEE Access. 2018; 6:10458–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808843.
28. Lee JT, Hsieh CC, Lin CH, Lin YJ, Kao CY. Prediction of hospitalization using artificial intelligence for urgent patients in the emergency department. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):19472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98961-2.
29. Zlotnik A, Alfaro MC, Perez MC, Gallardo-Antolin A, Martinez JM. Building a decision support system for inpatient admission prediction with the Manchester triage system and administrative check-in variables. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016; 34(5):224–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000230.
30. Kim M, Park S, Kim C, Choi M. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical outcome prediction using nursing data in intensive care patients: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023; 138:104411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104411.
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr