J Korean Med Sci.  2025 Jan;40(2):e1. 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e1.

Effects of Genetic Risk and Lifestyle Habits on Gout: A Korean Cohort Study

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Biomedical Convergence, College of Biomedical Science, Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 3Eulji Rheumatology Research Institute, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
  • 4Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 5Department of Medical Bigdata Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea

Abstract

Background
Gout is a type of inflammatory arthritis caused by monosodium urate crystal deposits, and the prevalence of this condition has been increasing. This study aimed to determine the combined effects of genetic risk factors and lifestyle habits on gout, using data from a Korean cohort study. Identifying high-risk individuals in advance can help prevent gout and its associated disorders.
Methods
We analyzed data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study-Urban Health Examinees cohort (KoGES-HEXA). Genetic information of the participants was collected at baseline, and gout cases were identified based on patient statements. The polygenic risk score (PRS) was calculated using nine independent genome-wide association study datasets, and lifestyle factors and metabolic syndrome status were measured for each participant using the KoGES. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for gout in relation to genetic risk, lifestyle habits, and metabolic health status, after adjusting for age and sex.
Results
Among 44,605 participants, 617 were diagnosed with gout. Gout was associated with older age, higher body mass index, and higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and hypertriglyceridemia. High PRS, unfavorable lifestyle habits, and poor metabolic profiles were significantly associated with an increased risk of gout. Compared with that in the low-genetic-risk and healthy lifestyle group or ideal metabolic profile group, the risk of gout was increased in the high-genetic-risk plus unfavorable lifestyle (OR, 3.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.32–6.03) or poor metabolic profile (OR, 7.78; 95% CI, 4.61–13.40) group. Conversely, adherence to favorable lifestyle habits significantly reduced gout risk, especially in high-genetic-risk groups.
Conclusion
Genetic predisposition and unhealthy lifestyle habits significantly increase the risk of gout. Promoting healthy lifestyle habits is crucial to prevent the development of gout, particularly in individuals with high genetic susceptibility.

Keyword

Gout; Polygenic Risk Score; Lifestyle Habits; Metabolic Syndrome; Korean Cohort

Figure

  • Fig. 1 ORs and 95% CIs for gout according to genetic risk (A), lifestyle (B), and metabolic status (C).OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

  • Fig. 2 ORs and 95% CIs for gout based on the interaction between genetic risk and lifestyle habits (A) and between genetic risk and metabolic status (B).OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

  • Fig. 3 Forest plot for gout risk reduced by lifestyle habits (A) and metabolic health status (B) in the genetic risk group.OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.


Reference

1. Ahn JK. Epidemiology and treatment-related concerns of gout and hyperuricemia in Korean. J Rheum Dis. 2023; 30(2):88–98. PMID: 37483480.
2. Park JS, Kang M, Song JS, Lim HS, Lee CH. Trends of gout prevalence in South Korea based on medical utilization: a National Health Insurance Service database (2002~2015). J Rheum Dis. 2020; 27(3):174–181.
3. Choi SW, Mak TS, O’Reilly PF. Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses. Nat Protoc. 2020; 15(9):2759–2772. PMID: 32709988.
4. Duncan L, Shen H, Gelaye B, Meijsen J, Ressler K, Feldman M, et al. Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):3328. PMID: 31346163.
5. Zhang Y, Yang R, Dove A, Li X, Yang H, Li S, et al. Healthy lifestyle counteracts the risk effect of genetic factors on incident gout: a large population-based longitudinal study. BMC Med. 2022; 20(1):138. PMID: 35484537.
6. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81(3):559–575. PMID: 17701901.
7. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015; 4(1):7. PMID: 25722852.
8. Hwang MY, Choi NH, Won HH, Kim BJ, Kim YJ. Analyzing the Korean reference genome with meta-imputation increased the imputation accuracy and spectrum of rare variants in the Korean population. Front Genet. 2022; 13:1008646. PMID: 36506321.
9. Tin A, Marten J, Halperin Kuhns VL, Li Y, Wuttke M, Kirsten H, et al. Target genes, variants, tissues and transcriptional pathways influencing human serum urate levels. Nat Genet. 2019; 51(10):1459–1474. PMID: 31578528.
10. Nakayama A, Nakaoka H, Yamamoto K, Sakiyama M, Shaukat A, Toyoda Y, et al. GWAS of clinically defined gout and subtypes identifies multiple susceptibility loci that include urate transporter genes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76(5):869–877. PMID: 27899376.
11. Li C, Li Z, Liu S, Wang C, Han L, Cui L, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new risk loci for gout arthritis in Han Chinese. Nat Commun. 2015; 6(1):7041. PMID: 25967671.
12. Knevel R, le Cessie S, Terao CC, Slowikowski K, Cui J, Huizinga TW, et al. Using genetics to prioritize diagnoses for rheumatology outpatients with inflammatory arthritis. Sci Transl Med. 2020; 12(545):eaay1548. PMID: 32461333.
13. Mars N, Lindbohm JV, Della Briotta Parolo P, Widén E, Kaprio J, Palotie A, et al. Systematic comparison of family history and polygenic risk across 24 common diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 2022; 109(12):2152–2162. PMID: 36347255.
14. Sinnott-Armstrong N, Tanigawa Y, Amar D, Mars N, Benner C, Aguirre M, et al. Genetics of 35 blood and urine biomarkers in the UK Biobank. Nat Genet. 2021; 53(2):185–194. PMID: 33462484.
15. Tanigawa Y, Qian J, Venkataraman G, Justesen JM, Li R, Tibshirani R, et al. Significant sparse polygenic risk scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank. PLoS Genet. 2022; 18(3):e1010105. PMID: 35324888.
16. Privé F, Aschard H, Carmi S, Folkersen L, Hoggart C, O’Reilly PF, et al. Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort. Am J Hum Genet. 2022; 109(1):12–23. PMID: 34995502.
17. Sumpter NA, Takei R, Cadzow M, Topless RK, Phipps-Green AJ, Murphy R, et al. Association of gout polygenic risk score with age at disease onset and tophaceous disease in European and Polynesian men with gout. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75(5):816–825. PMID: 36281732.
18. Batt C, Phipps-Green AJ, Black MA, Cadzow M, Merriman ME, Topless R, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: a risk factor for prevalent gout with SLC2A9 genotype-specific effects on serum urate and risk of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(12):2101–2106. PMID: 24026676.
19. Zhang T, Xu X, Chang Q, Lv Y, Zhao Y, Niu K, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption, genetic predisposition, and the risk of gout: the UK Biobank study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024; 63(1):165–173. PMID: 37129545.
20. Li T, Li S, Tian T, Nie Z, Xu W, Liu L, et al. Association and interaction between dietary patterns and gene polymorphisms in Liangshan residents with hyperuricemia. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):1356. PMID: 35079028.
21. Tu HP, Chung CM, Ko AM, Lee SS, Lai HM, Lee CH, et al. Additive composite ABCG2, SLC2A9 and SLC22A12 scores of high-risk alleles with alcohol use modulate gout risk. J Hum Genet. 2016; 61(9):803–810. PMID: 27225847.
22. Jeon HK, Yoo HY. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms link gout with health-related lifestyle factors in Korean cohorts. PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295038. PMID: 38060535.
23. Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(17):2190–2191. PMID: 20616382.
24. Lin K, McCormick N, Yokose C, Joshi AD, Lu N, Curhan GC, et al. Interactions between genetic risk and diet influencing risk of incident female gout: discovery and replication analysis of four prospective cohorts. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75(6):1028–1038. PMID: 36512683.
25. Zhang T, Gu Y, Meng G, Zhang Q, Liu L, Wu H, et al. Genetic risk, adherence to a healthy lifestyle, and hyperuricemia: the TCLSIH cohort study. Am J Med. 2023; 136(5):476–483.e5. PMID: 36708795.
26. Thompson MD, Wu YY, Cooney RV, Wilkens LR, Haiman CA, Pirkle CM. Modifiable factors and incident gout across ethnicity within a large multiethnic cohort of older adults. J Rheumatol. 2022; 49(5):504–512. PMID: 35105711.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr