Korean Circ J.  2024 Dec;54(12):825-835. 10.4070/kcj.2024.0097.

Exercise Preferences and Barriers Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction or Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations
  • 1Frontier Research Institute of Convergence Sports Science, FRICSS, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Exercise Medicine Center for Diabetes and Cancer Patients, ICONS, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is highly recommended in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), participation in CR is low mainly due to access barriers. Home-based CR (HBCR) has been recommended to overcome access barriers. Exercise is a core component of CR and should be developed and implemented based on individual characteristics. We aimed to assess physical activity behaviors, exercise preferences, and exercise barriers to understand physical activity characteristics of CVD patients.
Methods
Participants were patients between the ages 19 to 75 years with a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or myocardial infarction (MI). They completed a cross-sectional survey at a tertiary hospital's outpatient clinic from April to June 2021. Survey data included physical activity levels, patterns, preference, and barriers of exercise.
Results
Participants (n=189; 143 males, 46 females, 62.1±12.0 years) were diagnosed as either HFrEF (n=160, 84.7%) or a history of MI (n=97, 51.3%). Only 26.5% of patients engaged in moderate to vigorous exercise for more than 150 minutes per week. Participants preferred exercising alone or with families. Walking (65.6%) and resistance exercises (35.4%) were favored, with outdoor (37%) and home-based (30.2%) settings preferred over fitness centers (10.6%) and hospitals (0.5%). Barriers to exercise included fatigue (34.4%), poor health perception (31.7%), and low fitness levels (30.7%).
Conclusions
The results of this study can be used to develop tailored HBCR programs that consider individual preferences and address specific barriers, facilitating adequate physical activity engagement.

Keyword

Cardiac rehabilitation; Cardiovascular disease; Physical activity; Exercise

Cited by  1 articles

Insights for Tailoring Exercise Recommendations in Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Patients’ Perspectives
Jinsung Jeon, Eung Ju Kim
Korean Circ J. 2024;54(12):836-837.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0265.


Reference

1. Gaidai O, Cao Y, Loginov S. Global cardiovascular diseases death rate prediction. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023; 48:101622. PMID: 36724816.
Article
2. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022; 145:e153–e639. PMID: 35078371.
3. Yen FS, Wei JC, Chiu LT, Hsu CC, Hwu CM. Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease development. J Transl Med. 2022; 20:9. PMID: 34980154.
Article
4. Vaduganathan M, Mensah GA, Turco JV, Fuster V, Roth GA. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk: a compass for future health. Washington, D.C.: American College of Cardiology Foundation;2022. p. 2361–2371.
5. Berry JD, Dyer A, Cai X, et al. Lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:321–329. PMID: 22276822.
Article
6. Toppila I, Ukkola-Vuoti L, Perttilä J, et al. Cardiovascular event rate and death in high-risk secondary prevention patient cohort in Finland: a registry study. Clin Cardiol. 2022; 45:342–351. PMID: 35289408.
Article
7. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380:219–229. PMID: 22818936.
Article
8. Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162:123–132. PMID: 25599350.
Article
9. Taylor RS, Dalal HM, McDonagh ST. The role of cardiac rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular outcomes. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022; 19:180–194. PMID: 34531576.
Article
10. Alpert JS. Cardiac rehabilitation: an underutilized class I treatment for cardiovascular disease. Am J Med. 2020; 133:1005–1006. PMID: 32027835.
Article
11. Kim C, Sung J, Han JY, et al. Current status of cardiac rehabilitation in the regional cardiocerebrovascular centers in Korea. J Clin Med. 2021; 10:5079. PMID: 34768598.
Article
12. Kim SH, Ro JS, Kim Y, Leigh JH, Kim WS. Underutilization of hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35:e262. PMID: 32743992.
Article
13. Anderson L, Sharp GA, Norton RJ, et al. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6:CD007130. PMID: 28665511.
Article
14. Dalal HM, Zawada A, Jolly K, Moxham T, Taylor RS. Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010; 340:b5631. PMID: 20085991.
Article
15. Zwisler AD, Norton RJ, Dean SG, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 221:963–969. PMID: 27441476.
Article
16. Bakhshayeh S, Sarbaz M, Kimiafar K, Vakilian F, Eslami S. Barriers to participation in center-based cardiac rehabilitation programs and patients’ attitude toward home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021; 37:158–168. PMID: 31155986.
Article
17. Im HW, Baek S, Jee S, Ahn JM, Park MW, Kim WS. Barriers to outpatient hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med. 2018; 42:154–165. PMID: 29560336.
Article
18. Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019; 140:e69–e89. PMID: 31082266.
Article
19. Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the world health organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Z Gesundh wiss. 2006; 14:66–70.
Article
20. Jones LW, Courneya KS. Exercise counseling and programming preferences of cancer survivors. Cancer Pract. 2002; 10:208–215. PMID: 12100105.
21. Kang DW, Chung JY, Lee MK, et al. Exercise barriers in Korean colorectal cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15:7539–7545. PMID: 25292025.
Article
22. Darden D, Richardson C, Jackson EA. Physical activity and exercise for secondary prevention among patients with cardiovascular disease. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2013; 7:411–416.
Article
23. Moore SM, Kramer FM. Women’s and men’s preferences for cardiac rehabilitation program features. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996; 16:163–168. PMID: 8761836.
Article
24. Tang LH, Kikkenborg Berg S, Christensen J, et al. Patients’ preference for exercise setting and its influence on the health benefits gained from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 232:33–39. PMID: 28159358.
Article
25. De Angelis C, Bunker S, Schoo A. Exploring the barriers and enablers to attendance at rural cardiac rehabilitation programs. Aust J Rural Health. 2008; 16:137–142. PMID: 18471183.
Article
26. Boyde M, Rankin J, Whitty JA, et al. Patient preferences for the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation. Patient Educ Couns. 2018; 101:2162–2169. PMID: 30025615.
Article
27. Alsaleh E, Baniyasin F. Prevalence of physical activity levels and perceived benefits of and barriers to physical activity among Jordanian patients with coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2023; 10:1041428. PMID: 36684963.
Article
28. Rogerson MC, Murphy BM, Bird S, Morris T. “I don’t have the heart”: a qualitative study of barriers to and facilitators of physical activity for people with coronary heart disease and depressive symptoms. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:140. PMID: 23194091.
Article
29. Chia S, Wong XY, Toon ML, et al. Patient preferences for types of community-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. Heart Asia. 2018; 10:e010976. PMID: 29387175.
Article
30. Liu Y, Su M, Lei Y, Tian J, Xue L, Zhang L. Patient preferences for cardiac rehabilitation - a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023; 17:75–88. PMID: 36636288.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr