Womens Health Nurs.  2024 Sep;30(3):203-215. 10.4069/whn.2024.09.10.

Factors influencing happiness and depression in high-risk pregnant women: a cross-sectional study using the ecological systems approach

• Choi H

• KMID: 2563716
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/whn.2024.09.10

Abstract

Purpose
The increasing number of high-risk pregnancies has led to a greater emphasis on psychological well-being in nursing care. However, reducing depression does not automatically equate to increasing happiness. This study aimed to systematically examine the factors influencing happiness and depression among high-risk pregnant women in South Korea.
Methods
This correlational, cross-sectional study was based on the ecological systems theory. In total, 152 high-risk pregnant women completed a self-report survey questionnaire available online or offline. Data were analyzed using hierarchical regression analysis.
Results
The first model (individual system) identified pregnancy stress and mindfulness as significant factors influencing both happiness and depression. The second model (microsystem) identified medical status at the time of the survey, maternal-fetal interaction, marital intimacy, and social support as additional significant factors influencing either happiness or depression. In the third model (mesosystem), maternal-fetal interaction and paternal-fetal attachment were no longer identified as significant factors. Although the fourth model (exosystem) did not identify community service as a significant factor, individual (pregnancy stress, mindfulness) and microsystem (marital intimacy) factors were found to influence happiness and depression. Medical status at the time of survey and social support were additional factors that influenced happiness, but not depression. These factors explained 51.2% and 55.5% of the variance in happiness and depression, respectively, among high-risk pregnant women.
Conclusion
Different factors at the individual and microsystem levels affected happiness and depression among high-risk pregnant women. Hence, efforts to reduce depression among these women should be accompanied by efforts to actively promote happiness.

Keyword

Depression; Ecology; Happiness; High-risk pregnancy

Figure

• 

  Figure 1. Conceptual framework for the study of happiness and depression in women with high-risk pregnancies using an ecological systems approach

Reference

References

1. Hwang JY. Reclassification of high-risk pregnancy for maternal-fetal healthcare providers. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2020; 24(2):65–74. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2020.24.2.65.

2. Ahn TG, Kim T, Kim Y, Hwang JY. The current state of maternity care and suggestions for improvement in the management of high-risk pregnancies in South Korea. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2018; 22(3):134–141. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2018.22.3.134.

3. Park SH, Lim DO. Secular trends of multiple birth rate in Korea: 1981-2017. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2019; 23(3):202–208. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2019.23.3.202.

4. American Psychological Association. What is depression? [Internet]. Washington: Author;2020. [cited 2023 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/depression/what-is-depression.

5. Yoo H, Ahn S, Park S, Kim J, Oh J, Koh M. Factors influencing prenatal and postpartum depression in Korea: a prospective cohort study. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021; 27(4):326–336. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.11.17.

6. Doty MS, Chen HY, Grace R, Ashimi SS, Chauhan SP. Stress, anxiety and depression levels in pregnancy: outpatient versus inpatient. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(25):9608–9613. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2049748.

7. Byrn M, Penckofer S. The relationship between gestational diabetes and antenatal depression. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015; 44(2):246–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12554.

8. Ni Q, Cheng G, Chen A, Heinonen S. Early detection of mental illness for women suffering high-risk pregnancies: an explorative study on self-perceived burden during pregnancy and early postpartum depressive symptoms among Chinese women hospitalized with threatened preterm labour. BMC Psychiatry. 2020; 20(1):250. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02667-0.

9. Diener E. Happiness: the science of subjective well-being [Internet]. In : Biswas-Diener R, Diener E, editors. Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers;2024. [cited 2024 Feb 20]. Available from: http://noba.to/qnw7g32t.

10. Suh E, Koo J. A concise measure of subjective well-being (COMOSWB): scale development and validation. Korean J Soc Pers Psychol. 2011; 25(1):95–113. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.1.006.

11. Cheng CY, Pickler RH. Maternal psychological well-being and salivary cortisol in late pregnancy and early post-partum. Stress Health. 2010; 26(3):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1285.

12. Lee G, Choi H. Factors influencing happiness among pregnant women in the ecological systems theory. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2019; 30(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2019.30.1.11.

13. Kim M, Kim YA. The effects of postpartum depression intervention programs in Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2019; 19(3):649–658. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.03.649.

14. Wilhelm LA, Alves CN, Demori CC, da Silva SC, Meincke SM, Ressel LB. Feelings of women who experienced a high-risk pregnancy: a descriptive study. Online Braz J Nurs. 2015; 14(3):284–293. https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20155206.

15. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;1981.

16. Li P, Wang H, Feng J, Chen G, Zhou Z, Gou X, et al. Association between perceived stress and prenatal depressive symptoms: moderating effect of social support. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021; 14:3195–3204. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S341090.

17. Khoury B. Mindfulness and happiness. Mindfulness. 2023; 14:2824–2828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02226-0.

18. Matvienko-Sikar K, Lee L, Murphy G, Murphy L. The effects of mindfulness interventions on prenatal well-being: a systematic review. Psychol Health. 2016; 31(12):1415–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2016.1220557.

19. Delavari M, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Mirghafourvand M. The relationship of maternal-fetal attachment and postpartum depression: a longitudinal study. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018; 32(2):263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2017.11.013.

20. Alipour Z, Kazemi A, Kheirabadi G, Eslami AA. Relationship between marital quality, social support and mental health during pregnancy. Community Ment Health J. 2019; 55(6):1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00387-8.

21. Noh NI, Yeom HA. Development of the Korean Paternal-Fetal Attachment Scale (K-PAFAS). Asian Nurs Res. 2017; 11(2):98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2017.05.001.

22. Kang DI, Park E. Do taegyo practices, self-esteem, and social support affect maternal-fetal attachment in high-risk pregnant women? A cross-sectional survey. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022; 28(4):338–347. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2022.12.16.

23. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987; 150:782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.

24. Han K, Kim M, Park JM. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Korean version: reliability and validity. J Korean Soc Biol Ther Psychiatry. 2004; 10(2):201–207.

25. Kim Y, Chung CW. Development of the Korean Pregnancy Stress Scale. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2018; 15(2):113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12175.

26. Park SH. Development of the mindfulness scale. [PhD thesis]. Seoul: The Catholic University of Korea;2006.

27. Kim HW, Hong KJ. Development of a maternal identity scale for pregnant women. J Nurs Acad Soc. 1996; 26(3):531–543. https://doi.org/10.4040/jnas.1996.26.3.531.

28. Waring EM, Reddon JR. The measurement of intimacy in marriage: the Waring Intimacy Questionnaire. J Clin Psychol. 1983; 39(1):53–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198301)39:1<53::aid-jclp2270390110>3.0.co;2-0.

29. Kim SN. A structural model for quality of life in women having hysterectomies. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1999; 29(1):161–173. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.1999.29.1.161.

30. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988; 52(1):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.

31. Shin JS, Lee YB. The effects of social supports on psychosocial well-being of the unemployed. Korean J Soc Welf. 1999; 37:241–269.

32. Koo J, Suh E. Happiness in Korea: Who is happy and when? Korean J Soc Pers Psychol. 2011; 25(2):143–166. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.008.

33. Bergink V, Kooistra L, Lambregtse-van den Berg MP, Wijnen H, Bunevicius R, van Baar A, et al. Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy. J Psychosom Res. 2011; 70(4):385–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.008.

34. Gourounti C, Karpathiotaki N, Vaslamatzis G. Psychosocial stress in high risk pregnancy. Int Arch Med. 2015; 8(95):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3823/1694.

35. Tanpradit K, Kaewkiattikun K. The effect of perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth. Int J Womens Health. 2020; 12:287–293. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S239138.

36. Sakamoto JL, Carandang RR, Kharel M, Shibanuma A, Yarotskaya E, Basargina M, et al. Effects of mHealth on the psychosocial health of pregnant women and mothers: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(2):e056807. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056807.

37. Lee HJ, Kim HY. Effects of anxiety and smartphone dependency on sleep quality among pregnant women with preterm labor. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020; 26(2):191–199. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.06.18.2.

38. Goetz M, Schiele C, Müller M, Matthies LM, Deutsch TM, Spano C, et al. Effects of a brief electronic mindfulness-based intervention on relieving prenatal depression and anxiety in hospitalized high-risk pregnant women: exploratory pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e17593. https://doi.org/10.2196/17593.

39. Navon-Eyal M, Taubman-Ben-Ari O. Psychological well-being during pregnancy: the contribution of stress factors and maternal-fetal bonding. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2023 Jun 9 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2023.2222143.

40. Pisoni C, Garofoli F, Tzialla C, Orcesi S, Spinillo A, Politi P, et al. Risk and protective factors in maternal-fetal attachment development. Early Hum Dev. 2014; 90 Suppl 2:S45–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(14)50012-6.

41. Yoon SH, Sung MH. Does family support mediate the effect of anxiety and depression on maternal-fetal attachment in high-risk pregnant women admitted to the maternal-fetal intensive care unit? Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021; 27(2):104–112. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.05.14.

42. Mirzakhani K, Ebadi A, Faridhosseini F, Khadivzadeh T. Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):526. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03190-6.

43. Dehshiri M, Ghorashi Z, Lotfipur SM. Effects of husband involvement in prenatal care on couples' intimacy and postpartum blues in primiparous women: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023; 11(3):179–189. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.97739.2204.

44. Morikawa M, Okada T, Ando M, Aleksic B, Kunimoto S, Nakamura Y, et al. Relationship between social support during pregnancy and postpartum depressive state: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:10520. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10520.

45. Baker B, Yang I. Social media as social support in pregnancy and the postpartum. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018; 17:31–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.05.003.

46. Nosrati A, Mirzakhani K, Golmakani N, Asghari Nekah SM, Esmaeili H. The effect of paternal-fetal attachment training on marital satisfaction during pregnancy. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2018; 6(1):1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.22038/JMRH.2017.9230.

47. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Expansion of diseases subject to medical expenses support projects for high-risk pregnant women [Internet]. Sejong, Korea: Author;2023. [cited 2023 Oct 6]. Available from: https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&SEARCHKEY=&SEARCHVALUE=&page=1&CONT_SEQ=343378.

48. Kim H, Park H. Health-care needs of high-risk pregnant women hospitalized in maternal-fetal intensive care units: a mixed-methods design. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2018; 24(2):196–208. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2018.24.2.196.