Anesth Pain Med.  2024 Oct;19(Suppl 1):S12-S24. 10.17085/apm.23158.

Neuromuscular blockade monitoring in pediatric patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar, Istanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

The administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), the cornerstone of pediatric anesthesia, facilitates intubation and muscle relaxation during surgery. However, NMBAs can also lead to serious complications including respiratory depression, residual paralysis, and prolonged recovery. Neuromuscular monitoring (NMM) in pediatric patients is therefore essential, as it is in adults, to ensure adequate paralysis during surgery and prompt recovery from NMBA-induced paralysis. This article aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of NMM in pediatric anesthesia including the various available methods, their advantages and disadvantages, and the importance of a standardized NMM approach.

Keyword

Neuromuscular blockers, monitorization; Neuromuscular monitorization; Pediatric Anesthesia; Train-of-four; Quantitative neuromuscular monitorization

Figure

  • Fig. 1. NMB after a normal intubating dose of a non-depolarizing NMBA, as classified using PTC and TOF stimulation. NBM: neuromuscular blockade, NMBA: neuromuscular blocking agents, PTC: post-tetanic count, TOF: train-of-four, N/A: non applicable. Adapted from the article of Heier and Caldwell (Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 1070-8) [43].

  • Fig. 2. (A) The adult and pediatric versions of the TetraSens™ self-adhesive sensor. The adult sensor measures approximately 9 inches in length compared to 7 inches for the pediatric sensor. The skin was prepped with an alcohol swab and the sensor was placed. (B) The pediatric sensor or recording electrodes (TetraSens™ Pediatric) was placed on the palmar surface of the adductor pollicis muscle and its insertion on the medial aspect of the proximal phalanx of the thumb. The stimulating electrodes were placed along the ulnar nerve on the volar surface of the forearm. After the sensor was placed on the patient, the electrodes were connected using the cord to the TetraGraph™ (Senzime AB). The device automatically determines the stimulating current necessary for maximal muscle contraction, to ensure consistent recruitment of all muscle fibers. Adapted from the article of Heier and Caldwell (Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 1070-8) [43].

  • Fig. 3. Traditional NMM placement in pediatric patient. NMM: neuromuscular monitoring.

  • Fig. 4. Anatomy of the muscles innervated by the ulnar nerve.


Reference

1. Duţu M, Ivaşcu R, Tudorache O, Morlova D, Stanca A, Negoiţă S, et al. Neuromuscular monitoring: an update. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018; 25:55–60.
2. Klucka J, Kosinova M, Krikava I, Stoudek R, Toukalkova M, Stourac P. Residual neuromuscular block in paediatric anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 122:e1–2.
Article
3. Cammu G, De Witte J, De Veylder J, Byttebier G, Vandeput D, Foubert L, et al. Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102:426–9.
Article
4. Rodney G, Raju P, Brull SJ. Neuromuscular block management: evidence-based principles and practice. BJA Edu. 2024; 24:13–22.
Article
5. Fuchs-Buder T, Brull SJ, Fagerlund MJ, Renew JR, Cammu G, Murphy GS, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents III: The 2023 Geneva revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023; 67:994–1017.
Article
6. Scheffenbichler FT, Rudolph MI, Friedrich S, Althoff FC, Xu X, Spicer AC, et al. Effects of high neuromuscular blocking agent dose on post-operative respiratory complications in infants and children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020; 64:156–67.
Article
7. Raval AD, Uyei J, Karabis A, Bash LD, Brull SJ. Incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade and use of neuromuscular blocking agents with or without antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2020; 64:109818.
Article
8. Carvalho H, Verdonck M, Cools W, Geerts L, Forget P, Poelaert J. Forty years of neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: A meta-analysis and evaluation of confidence in network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125:466–82.
Article
9. Thilen SR, Weigel WA, Todd MM, Dutton RP, Lien CA, Grant SA, et al. 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists practice guidelines for monitoring and antagonism of neuromuscular blockade: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2023; 138:13–41.
Article
10. Yang L, Yang D, Liu C, Zuo Y. Application of neuromuscular monitoring in pediatric anesthesia: a survey in China. J Perianesth Nurs. 2020; 35:658–60.e1.
11. Vanlinthout LE, Geniets B, Driessen JJ, Saldien V, Lapré R, Berghmans J, et al. Neuromuscular-blocking agents for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients (0-12 years): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Anesth. 2020; 30:401–14.
Article
12. Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72 Suppl 1:16–37.
Article
13. Murphy GS. Neuromuscular monitoring in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2018; 126:464–8.
Article
14. Kopman AF, Yee PS, Neuman GG. Relationship of the train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86:765–71.
Article
15. Eikermann M, Groeben H, Hüsing J, Peters J. Accelerometry of adductor pollicis muscle predicts recovery of respiratory function from neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98:1333–7.
16. Eriksson LI, Sundman E, Olsson R, Nilsson L, Witt H, Ekberg O, et al. Functional assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralyzed humans: simultaneous videomanometry and mechanomyography of awake human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997; 87:1035–43.
17. Brull SJ, Kopman AF. Current status of neuromuscular reversal and monitoring: Challenges and opportunities. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126:173–90.
18. Viby-Mogensen J, Claudius C. Evidence-based management of neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111:1–2.
Article
19. Carter JA, Arnold R, Yate PM, Flynn PJ. Assessment of the Datex Relaxograph during anesthesia and atracurium induced neuromuscular blockade. Br J Anaesth. 1986; 58:1447–52.
20. Jensen E, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U. The accelograph: a new neuromuscular transmission monitor. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988; 32:49–52.
Article
21. Motamed C, Kirov K, Combes X, Duvaldestin P. Comparison between the Datex-Ohmeda M-NMT module and a force-displacement transducer for monitoring neuromuscular blockade. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003; 20:467–9.
Article
22. Bowdle A, Bussey L, Michaelsen K, Jelacic S, Nair B, Togashi K, et al. Counting train-of-four twitch response: Comparison of palpation to mechanomyography, acceleromyography, and electromyography. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 124:712–7.
Article
23. Todd MM, Hindman BJ, King BJ. The implementation of quantitative electromyographic neuromuscular monitoring in an academic anesthesia department. Anesth Analg. 2014; 119:323–31.
Article
24. Bowdle A, Bussey L, Michaelsen K, Jelacic S, Nair B, Togashi K, et al. A comparison of a prototype electromyograph vs. a mechanomyograph and an acceleromyograph for assessment of neuromuscular blockade. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75:187–95.
Article
25. Nemes R, Lengyel S, Nagy G, Hampton DR, Gray M, Renew JR, et al. Ipsilateral and simultaneous comparison of responses from acceleromyography and electromyography-based neuromuscular monitors. Anesthesiology. 2021; 135:597–611.
Article
26. Driessen JJ, Robertson EN, Booij LHD. Acceleromyography in neonates and small infants: Baseline calibration and recovery of the responses after neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium. Eur J Anaesth. 2005; 22:11–5.
Article
27. Espinal LM, Kalsotra S, Rice-Weimer J, Kitio SA, Tobias JD. Tolerance to preoperative placement of electrodes for neuromuscular monitoring using the Tetragraph™. Saudi J Anaesth. 2024; 18:205–10.
Article
28. Renew JR, Hernandez‑Torres V, Logvinov I, Nemes R, Nagy G, Li Z, et al. Comparison of the TetraGraph and TOFscan for monitoring recovery from neuromuscular blockade in the post‑anesthesia care unit. J Clin Anesth. 2021; 71:110234.
29. Kalsotra S, Rice-Weimer J, Tobias JD. Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring in children using a novel pediatric sensor. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023; 17:378–82.
Article
30. Goudsouzian NG. Maturation of neuromuscular transmission in the infant. Br J Anaesth. 1980; 52:205–14.
Article
31. Unterbuchner C, Werkmann M, Ziegleder R, Kraus S, Seyfried T, Graf B, et al. Shortening of the twitch stabilization period by tetanic stimulation in acceleromyography in infants, children and young adults (STSTS-Study): a prospective randomised, controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020; 34:1343–9.
Article
32. Thilen SR, Hansen BE, Ramaiah R, Kent CD, Treggiari MM, Bhananker SM. Intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring site and residual paralysis. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117:964–72.
Article
33. Bowdle A, Michaelsen K. Quantitative twitch monitoring:What works best and how do we know? Anesthesiology. 2021; 135:558–61.
34. Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Real time versus slow-motion train-of-four monitoring: A theory to explain the inaccuracy of visual assessment. Anesth Analg. 1995; 80:548–51.
35. Bowdle A, Jelacic S. Progress towards a standard of quantitative twitch monitoring. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75:1133–5.
Article
36. Zhou ZJ, Wang X, Zheng S, Zhang XF. The characteristics of the staircase phenomenon during the period of twitch stabilization in infants in TOF mode. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013; 23:322–7.
37. Owusu-Bediako K, Munch R, Mathias J, Tobias JD. Feasibility of intraoperative quantitative neuromuscular blockade monitoring in children using electromyography. Saudi J Anaesth. 2022; 16:412–8.
Article
38. Soffer OD, Kim A, Underwood E, Hansen A, Cornelissen L, Berde C. Neurophysiological assessment of prolonged recovery from neuromuscular blockade in the neonatal intensive care unit. Front Pediatr. 2020; 8:580.
39. Yhim HB, Jang YE, Lee JH, Kim EH, Kim JT, Kim HS. Comparison of the TOFscan and TOF-Watch SX during pediatric neuromuscular function recovery: a prospective observational study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021; 10:45.
40. Heier T, Caldwell JE, Sessler DI, Miller RD. The effect of local surface and central cooling on adductor pollicis twitch tension during nitrous oxide/isoflurane and nitrous oxide/fentanyl anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology. 1990; 72:807–11.
41. Eriksson LI, Lennmarken C, Jensen E, Viby-Mogensen J. Twitch tension and train-of-four ratio during prolonged neuromuscular monitoring at different peripheral temperatures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991; 35:247–52.
42. Smith DC, Booth JV. Influence of muscle temperature and forearm position on evoked electromyography in the hand. Br J Anaesth. 1994; 72:407–10.
43. Heier T, Caldwell JE. Impact of hypothermia on the response to neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anesthesiology. 2006; 104:1070–80.
Article
44. Radkowski P, Barańska A, Mieszkowski M, Dawidowska-Fidrych J, Podhorodecka K. Methods for clinical monitoring of neuromuscular transmission in anesthesiology: a review. Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:9–20.
45. Habercorn S, Faulk JD. Monitoring Depth of Neuromuscular Blockade. [Internet]. 2024. [updated 2023 Apil 14; cited 2023 Sep 4]. Available from https://www.openanesthesia.org/keywords/monitoring-depth-of-neuromuscular-blockade/.
46. Fuchs-Buder T, Romero CS, Lewald H, Lamperti M, Afshari A, Hristovska AM, et al. Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: A guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023; 40:82–94.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr