Anesth Pain Med.  2024 Jul;19(3):216-226. 10.17085/apm.24059.

A smart device application for acute pain service in surgical patients at a tertiary hospital in South Korea: a prospective observational feasibility study

• Yoon SH
• Yoon S
• Jeong DS
• Lee M
• Lee E
• Cho YJ
• Lee HJ

• KMID: 2563561
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24059

Abstract

Background
Pain assessment and patient education are essential for successful postoperative pain management. However, the provision of personnel for performing these tasks is often insufficient. Recently, attempts have been made to implement smartphone applications for educating and monitoring surgical patients. We developed a smartphone application (app) for postoperative pain management, and conducted a feasibility study.
Methods
This single-center prospective observational study included 60 patients aged < 70 years who underwent elective surgery. This study evaluated the SmartAPS application, which offers tools for postoperative pain assessment and educational materials for pain management. The primary outcome was the active usage rate, defined as responding at least twice daily on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 2. Additionally, we investigated patient satisfaction with the app and educational videos as well as any challenges encountered during use.
Results
Sixty patients were enrolled in the study and active app use was achieved in 56.7% of them. Response rates peaked at 85.0% for pain intensity and 83.3% for opioid-related side effects at 14:00 on POD 1 but dropped to 56.7% and 58.3%, respectively, at 18:00 on POD 2. Among the patients who responded to the survey regarding the app usage, 84.0% reported satisfaction with the app and 80% found it beneficial for managing postoperative pain. Furthermore, 92.0% did not encounter difficulties using the app, indicating a generally positive user experience.
Conclusions
Our findings support the utility of the SmartAPS application in acute pain services, highlighting its potential for improving postoperative pain management.

Keyword

Digital health; Digital technology; Mobile applications; Pain measurement; Pain, postoperative; Smartphone; Telemedicine

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Screenshot images of the application.

• 

  Fig. 2. Survey results on satisfaction with application usage.

Reference

1. Wu CL, Richman JM. Postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004; 17:455–60.

2. Sinatra R. Causes and consequences of inadequate management of acute pain. Pain Med. 2010; 11:1859–71.

3. Berkowitz R, Vu J, Brummett C, Waljee J, Englesbe M, Howard R. The impact of complications and pain on patient satisfaction. Ann Surg. 2021; 273:1127–34.

4. Van Boekel RLM, Warlé MC, Nielen RGC, Vissers KCP, Van der Sande R, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Relationship between postoperative pain and overall 30-day complications in a broad surgical population: an observational study. Ann Surg. 2019; 269:856–65.

5. Kim BR, Yoon SH, Lee HJ. Practical strategies for the prevention and management of chronic postsurgical pain. Korean J Pain. 2023; 36:149–62.

6. Small C, Laycock H. Acute postoperative pain management. Br J Surg. 2020; 107:e70–80.

7. Miaskowski C, Crews J, Ready LB, Paul SM, Ginsberg B. Anesthesia-based pain services improve the quality of postoperative pain management. Pain. 1999; 80:23–9.

8. Nasir D, Howard JE, Joshi GP, Hill GE. A survey of acute pain service structure and function in United States hospitals. Pain Res Treat. 2011; 2011:934932.

9. Wang Y, Yang D, Zhao S, Han L, Xu F, Huang S, et al. Postoperative pain management in Chinese hospitals: a national survey. Br J Anaesth. 2021; 127:e200–2.

10. Van Boekel RLM, Steegers MAH, Verbeek-van Noord I, Van der Sande R, Vissers KCP. Acute pain services and postsurgical pain management in the Netherlands: a survey. Pain Pract. 2015; 15:447–54.

11. Lee A, Chan SKC, Chen PP, Gin T, Lau ASC, Chiu CH. The costs and benefits of extending the role of the acute pain service on clinical outcomes after major elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111:1042–50.

12. Powell AE, Davies HT, Bannister J, Macrae WA. Rhetoric and reality on acute pain services in the UK: a national postal questionnaire survey. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 92:689–93.

13. Powell AE, Davies HTO, Bannister J, Macrae WA. Challenge of improving postoperative pain management: case studies of three acute pain services in the UK National Health Service. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102:824–31.

14. Lee A, Chan S, Chen PP, Gin T, Lau AS. Economic evaluations of acute pain service programs: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2007; 23:726–33.

15. Assessment Department 2 of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Comprehensive Quality Report of Anesthesia 2021 (2nd). Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service [Internet]. 2022. May. [2024 Feb 29]. Available from https://www.hira.or.kr/ra/eval/asmWrptPopup.do?evlCd=35&pgmid=HIRAA030004000000.

16. WHO Africa. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. World Health Organization [Internet]. 2011. [cited 2023 Aug 23]. Available from https://www.afro.who.int/publications/mhealth-new-horizons-health-through-mobile-technologie.

17. Vardeh D, Edwards RR, Jamison RN, Eccleston C. There’s an app for that: mobile technology is a new advantage in managing chronic pain. Pain Clin Updates. 2013; 21:1–7.

18. Thurnheer SE, Gravestock I, Pichierri G, Steurer J, Burgstaller JM. Benefits of mobile apps in pain management: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6:e11231.

19. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2007; 85:867–72.

20. Lee HJ, Cho Y, Joo H, Jeon JY, Jang YE, Kim JT. Comparative study of verbal rating scale and numerical rating scale to assess postoperative pain intensity in the post anesthesia care unit: a prospective observational cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100:e24314.

21. Yoon S, Joo H, Oh YM, Lee J, Bahk JH, Lee HJ. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125:614–21.

22. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:1.

23. Thiel B, Godfried MB, Van Huizen EC, Mooijer BC, De Boer BA, Van Mierlo RAAM, et al. Patient reported postoperative pain with a smartphone application: a proof of concept. PLoS One. 2020; 15:e0232082.

24. Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017; 27:591–608.

25. Lalloo C, Shah U, Birnie KA, Davies-Chalmers C, Rivera J, Stinson J, et al. Commercially available smartphone apps to support postoperative pain self-management: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5:e162.

26. Zhao P, Yoo I, Lancey R, Varghese E. Mobile applications for pain management: an app analysis for clinical usage. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019; 19:106.

27. Carlier J, Robin F, Pages N, Quinart A, Roy M, Pauchard JC, et al. Pain evaluation after day-surgery using a mobile phone application. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021; 40:100879.

28. Pronk Y, Peters MCWM, Sheombar A, Brinkman JM. Effectiveness of a mobile eHealth app in guiding patients in pain control and opiate use after total knee replacement: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8:e16415.

29. Highland KB, Tran J, Edwards H, Bedocs P, Suen J, Buckenmaier CC. Feasibility of app-based postsurgical assessment of pain, pain impact, and regional anesthesia effects: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pain Med. 2019; 20:1592–9.

30. Kim CA, Park HS. Smartphone app education pertaining to patient controlled analgesia use and pain management after spinal anesthesia for lower extremity under orthopedic surgery. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2017; 24:255–64.

31. Scott AR, Alore EA, Naik AD, Berger DH, Suliburk JW. Mixed-methods analysis of factors impacting use of a postoperative mHealth app. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5:e11.

32. Abelson JS, Kaufman E, Symer M, Peters A, Charlson M, Yeo H. Barriers and benefits to using mobile health technology after operation: A qualitative study. Surgery. 2017; 162:605–11.

33. De La Cruz Monroy MFI, Mosahebi A. The use of smartphone applications (apps) for enhancing communication with surgical patients: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov. 2019; 26:244–59.

34. Bakker JP, Goldsack JC, Clarke M, Coravos A, Geoghegan C, Godfrey A, et al. A systematic review of feasibility studies promoting the use of mobile technologies in clinical research. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:47.