Arch Hand Microsurg.  2024 Dec;29(4):269-275. 10.12790/ahm.24.0036.

A mathematical approach to microvascular anastomosis for beginners and the effectiveness of chicken legs and partial meat from chicken legs and chicken wings as a training model

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gumi Hyundai Hospital, Gumi, Korea
  • 2Dr. Chae Orthopedic Clinic, Daegu, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
The aim of this study was to use a mathematical approach to understand the exact location and spacing of microvascular anastomosis, and investigate the effectiveness of a practice model using chicken legs and partial meat from chicken wings.
Methods
The suture techniques used for microvascular anastomosis were analyzed mathematically. In addition, chickens of various sizes were dissected to measure the size of blood vessels and compared with the size of blood vessels found in partial meat.
Results
When using eight- or nine-point sutures, the positions and intervals were different. Larger chickens had larger blood vessels. In the partial meat samples, the average size of the blood vessels was 0.8 mm for the radial artery, 0.45 mm for the ulnar artery, and 1.3 mm for the tibial artery.
Conclusion
It is important to understand the location and spacing of sutures through a mathematical analysis of microvascular anastomosis, which enables suturing techniques to be improved. The practice model using chicken legs and partial meat from chicken wings was found to be useful for beginners.

Keyword

Microvascular anastomosis; Microsurgery; Training

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Initial stitch position for 180° eight-suture anastomosis.

  • Fig. 2. Initial stitch position for 180° eight-suture anastomosis, assuming the vessel is a perfect circle.

  • Fig. 3. Initial stitch position for 180° eight-suture anastomosis, assuming the vessel is a straight line.

  • Fig. 4. Initial stitch position for 120° nine-suture anastomosis.

  • Fig. 5. Initial stitch position for 120° nine-suture anastomosis, assuming the vessel is a perfect circle.

  • Fig. 6. Initial stitch position for 120° nine-suture anastomosis, assuming the vessel is a straight line.

  • Fig. 7. Common chicken partial meat that are easily available.

  • Fig. 8. (A) Diameter of the partial meat radial artery. (B) Diameter of the partial meat ulnar artery. (C) Diameter of the partial meat tibia artery.


Reference

References

1. van Mulken TJ, Schols RM, Scharmga AM, et al. First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:757.
Article
2. van Mulken TJ, Schols RM, Qiu SS, et al. Robotic (super) microsurgery: feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions. J Surg Oncol. 2018; 118:826–31.
Article
3. Jose RR, Raja WK, Ibrahim AM, et al. Rapid prototyped sutureless anastomosis device from self-curing silk bio-ink. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015; 103:1333–43.
Article
4. Chung NY, Lim HC, Lee SH, Park JH, Park JW. Easy and fast anastomosis using microvascular anastomotic coupler system. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2008; 43:36–42.
Article
5. Jung YJ, Son DG, Kim HJ. MAC system for microanastomosis of free flap. Arch Reconstr Microsurg. 2006; 15:51–7.
6. Cho AB, Júnior RM. Effect of fibrin adhesive application in microvascular anastomosis: a comparative experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119:95–103.
Article
7. Aizawa T, Kuwabara M, Kubo S, et al. Sutureless microvascular anastomosis using intravascular stenting and cyanoacrylate adhesive. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018; 34:8–12.
Article
8. Lee JM, Seo KB. Factors affecting patency rate in microvascular anastomosis of the femoral artery in rat. Arch Hand Microsurg. 2002; 11:63–6.
9. Hong JW, Shin DW, Lee DW, Lee WJ. Robotic microsurgery training for robot assisted reconstructive surgery. Arch Hand Microsurg. 2019; 24:358–67.
Article
10. Dave A, Singhal M, Tiwari R, Chauhan S, De M. Effectiveness of a microsurgery training program using a chicken wing model. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2022; 56:191–7.
Article
11. Chen WF, Eid A, Yamamoto T, Keith J, Nimmons GL, Lawrence WT. A novel supermicrosurgery training model: the chicken thigh. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67:973–8.
Article
12. Levin SM. Alexis Carrel's historic leap of faith. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61:832–3.
Article
13. Jeong HS, Moon MS, Kim HS, Lee HK, Yi SY. Microsurgical training with fresh chicken legs. Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 70:57–61.
Article
14. Kim BJ, Kim ST, Jeong YG, Lee WH, Lee KS, Paeng SH. An efficient microvascular anastomosis training model based on chicken wings and simple instruments. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2013; 15:20–5.
Article
15. Kang BY, Jeon BJ, Lee KT, Mun GH. Comprehensive analysis of chicken vessels as microvascular anastomosis training model. Arch Plast Surg. 2017; 44:12–8.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr