Ann Liver Transplant.  2022 May;2(1):8-14. 10.52604/alt.22.0011.

Association between institutional liver transplantation cases volume and mortality: A meta-analysis of Korea-nationwide cohort studies using Korean National Healthcare Insurance Service database

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
  • 2Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Surgery, Dong-A University Hospital, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea

Abstract

Institutional case volume of liver transplantation (LT) is reported to be not associated with post-transplant survival in the United States, but their association was presented in several Korea-nationwide studies. Considering that the majority of LT centers in Korea are classified as low-volume centers, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of institutional LT case volume on post-transplant outcomes through a meta-analysis. This meta-analysis included four Korea-nationwide cohort studies using the database of Korean National Healthcare Insurance Service (NHIS) that focused on adult deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), pediatric LT, and liver re-transplantation. A total of 1,616 LT cases were performed in 56 centers in the year 2020. DDLT and LDLT were performed in 46 and 51 centers, respectively. A total of 2,648 adult DDLTs were performed at 54 centers. Centers were divided into high (>30 LTs/year)-, medium (10–30)-, and low (<10)-volume centers; and their in-hospital mortality (IHM) rates were 10.3%, 14.3%, and 17.1%, respectively. A total of 7,073 adult LDLTs were performed at 50 centers. Centers were divided into high (>50)-, medium (10-50)-, and low (<10)-volume centers; and their IHM rates were 2.8%, 4.1%, and 6.7%, respectively. A total of 521 pediatric LTs were performed at 22 centers. Centers were divided into high (>10)-, medium (1–10)-, and low (<1)-volume centers; and their IHM rates were 5.8%, 12.5%, and 32.1%, respectively. A total of 258 liver re-transplantation were performed; 175 cases were performed in 3 high-volume (≥64) centers and 83 cases were performed in 21 low-volume (<64) centers; and their IHM rates were 25% and 36%, respectively. The results of the present meta-analysis revealed the lower IHM rates in high-volume LT centers compared with low-volume centers regarding all types of LT including DDLT, adult LDLT, pediatric LT, and liver re-transplantation.

Keyword

Deceased donor liver transplantation; Living donor liver transplantation; Pediatric liver transplantation; Liver retransplantation; Mortality

Figure

  • Figure 1 Distribution of Korean transplantation centers performing deceased donor liver transplantations (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantations (LDLT) in 2020. LT, liver transplantation.

  • Figure 2 Relationship between the average annual number of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and in-hospital mortality at 54 centers, from 2007 to 2016. High-volume center: >30 liver transplantations (LTs)/year, Medium-volume center: 10–30 LTs/year, Low-volume center: <10 LTs/year.

  • Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier survival curve after adult deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) according to the center case volume.

  • Figure 4 Relationship between the average annual volume and in-hospital mortality after adult living donor liver transplantation. High-volume center: >50 liver transplantations (LTs)/year, Medium-volume center: 10–50 LTs/year, Low-volume center: <10 LTs/year.

  • Figure 5 Kaplan-Meier survival curve after adult living donor liver transplantation according to the center case volume.

  • Figure 6 Average annual case volume and in-hospital mortality after pediatric liver transplantation (LT). High-volume center: >10 LTs/year, Medium-volume center: 1–10 LTs/year, Low-volume center: <1 LTs/year.

  • Figure 7 Kaplan-Meier survival curve after pediatric liver transplantation (LT) according to the center case volume.

  • Figure 8 Relation between the institutional cases volume and in-hospital mortality after liver re-transplantation. High-volume center: ≥64 LTs/year, Low-volume center: <64 LTs/year. LT, liver transplantation.

  • Figure 9 Kaplan-Meier survival curve after liver re-transplantation according to the center case volume. LT, liver transplantation.

  • Figure 10 Fig. 10 . Forest plot of four Korea-nationwide cohort studies on LT. DDLT, deceased donor liver transplantation; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; LT, liver transplantation; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.


Cited by  2 articles

Ventilator support in the pretransplant period predisposes early graft failure after deceased donor liver transplantation
Nuri Lee, Sora Cha, Jongman Kim, Yunmi Lee, Enjin Kang, Hyun Jung Kim, Seung Hui Hong, Jinsoo Rhu, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jae-Won Joh
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023;105(3):141-147.    doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.3.141.

Successful living liver donation from a septuagenarian donor with cardiac diseases
Jiyoung Baik, Jongman Kim, Eunjin Lee, Sunghyo An, Namkee Oh, Eunmi Gil, Gaabsoo Kim
Ann Liver Transplant. 2024;4(2):124-128.    doi: 10.52604/alt.24.0016.


Reference

1. Edwards EB, Roberts JP, McBride MA, Schulak JA, Hunsicker LG. 1999; The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 341:2049–2053. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199912303412703. PMID: 10615076.
2. Northup PG, Pruett TL, Stukenborg GJ, Berg CL. 2006; Survival after adult liver transplantation does not correlate with transplant center case volume in the MELD era. Am J Transplant. 6:2455–2462. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01501.x. PMID: 16925567.
3. Scarborough JE, Pietrobon R, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Marroquin CE, Collins BH, Desai DM, et al. 2008; Relationship between provider volume and outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg. 12:1527–1533. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0589-5. PMID: 18612704.
4. Reese PP, Yeh H, Thomasson AM, Shults J, Markmann JF. 2009; Transplant center volume and outcomes after liver retransplantation. Am J Transplant. 9:309–317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02488.x. PMID: 19120081. PMCID: PMC2782897.
5. Yoo S, Jang EJ, Kim GH, Kim DH, Kwon SM, Lee H, et al. 2018; Effect of institutional case volume on in-hospital mortality after deceased donor liver transplantation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Korea. Transplant Proc. 50:3644–3649. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.07.016. PMID: 30577250.
6. Yoo S, Jang EJ, Yi NJ, Kim GH, Kim DH, Lee H, et al. 2019; Effect of institutional case volume on in-hospital mortality after living donor liver transplantation: analysis of 7073 cases between 2007 and 2016 in Korea. Transplantation. 103:952–958. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002394. PMID: 30086090.
7. Lee H, Jang EJ, Kim GH, Yi NJ, Kim DH, Yoo S, et al. 2019; Effect of case volume on mortality after pediatric liver transplantation in Korea. Transplantation. 103:1649–1654. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002522. PMID: 30399128.
8. Chung YK, Kang SH. 2021; Analysis of nationwide volume of liver transplantation in Korea during 2020 shows no definitive decrease during COVID-19 outbreak. Ann Liver Transplant. 1:135–139. DOI: 10.52604/alt.21.0026.
9. Oh SY, Jang EJ, Kim GH, Lee H, Yi NJ, Yoo S, et al. 2021; Association between hospital liver transplantation volume and mortality after liver re-transplantation. PLoS One. 16:e0255655. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255655. PMID: 34351979. PMCID: PMC8341477.
10. Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, Naitoh T, Katayose Y, Egawa S, et al. 2016; Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 263:664–672. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001437. PMID: 26636243.
11. Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF. 2010; Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg. 211:73–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.050. PMID: 20610252.
12. Hwang S, Lee SG, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Kim KH, Sung KB, et al. 2010; Morphometric and simulation analyses of right hepatic vein reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe grafts. Liver Transpl. 16:639–648. DOI: 10.1002/lt.22045. PMID: 20440773.
13. Hwang S, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, et al. 2012; Standardization of modified right lobe grafts to minimize vascular outflow complications for adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 44:457–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.072. PMID: 22410043.
14. Hwang S, Ha TY, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Kim KH, Song GW, et al. 2016; Standardized surgical techniques for adult living donor liver transplantation using a modified right lobe graft: a video presentation from bench to reperfusion. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 20:97–101. DOI: 10.14701/kjhbps.2016.20.3.97. PMID: 27621745. PMCID: PMC5018955.
15. Koo BK, Lee CH, Yang BR, Hwang SS, Choi NK. 2014; The incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus and related atherosclerotic complications in Korea: a National Health Insurance database study. PLoS One. 9:e110650. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110650. PMID: 25329714. PMCID: PMC4199756.
Full Text Links
  • ALT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr