Korean J Schizophr Res.  2024 Oct;27(2):63-71. 10.16946/kjsr.2024.27.2.63.

Factors Influencing the Personal Recovery in Outpatients With Schizophrenia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
This study aims to quantitatively investigate factors influencing personal recovery in patients with schizophrenia.
Methods
This study included 168 outpatients treated for schizophrenia. Patients’ sociodemographic factors (sex, age, education, and marital status), clinical factors (duration of illness, number of hospitalizations, and dose of drug), symptoms, behavior and symptoms, physical and mental health, family attitude, social support, attitude toward drug therapy, insight, self-esteem, hopelessness, and self-stigma were analyzed. The analysis included these 17 factors as explanatory variables for personal recovery to perform regression analysis.
Results
Backward elimination was used to select variables, and multiple regression analysis was performed. The five factors (symptoms, self-esteem, insight, physical, and mental health, and social support) accounted for 75.8% of the variance in patients’ perceived willingness for personal recovery.
Conclusion
Personal recovery in schizophrenic patients is very important because it means subjective satisfaction and quality of life in society. In this study, social support was the most important variable in predicting personal recovery. These results imply that not only symptoms but also various factors including social support should be emphasized when establishing a recovery strategy for schizophrenic patients.

Keyword

Insight; Physical and mental health; Recovery; Schizophrenia; Self-esteem; Social support; Symptoms; 병식; 사회적 지지; 신체적 정신적 건강; 자존감; 조현병; 증상; 회복

Reference

1. Andreasen NC, Carpenter WT Jr, Kane JM, Lasser RA, Marder SR, Weinberger DR. Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162:441–449.
Article
2. Harrison G, Croudace T, Mason P, Glazebrook C, Medley I. Predicting the long-term outcome of schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 1996; 26:697–705.
Article
3. Siegel SJ, Irani F, Brensinger CM, Kohler CG, Bilker WB, Ragland JD, et al. Prognostic variables at intake and long-term level of function in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163:433–441.
Article
4. Carpenter WT, Bartko JJ, Strauss JS, Hawk AB. Signs and symptoms as predictors of outcome: a report from the international pilot study of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1978; 135:940–944.
Article
5. Hawk AB, Carpenter WT Jr, Strauss JS. Diagnostic criteria and five-year outcome in schizophrenia. A report from the international pilot study of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975; 32:343–347.
Article
6. Tsuang MT, Woolson RF, Fleming JA. Long-term outcome of major psychoses. I. Schizophrenia and affective disorders compared with psychiatrically symptom-free surgical conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979; 36:1295–1301.
7. Lauronen E, Miettunen J, Veijola J, Karhu M, Jones PB, Isohanni M. Outcome and its predictors in schizophrenia within the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort. Eur Psychiatry. 2007; 22:129–136.
Article
8. Bachmann S, Bottmer C, Schroder J. One-year outcome and its prediction in first-episode schizophrenia--a naturalistic study. Psychopathology. 2008; 41:115–123.
Article
9. Bellack AS. Scientific and consumer models of recovery in schizophrenia: concordance, contrasts, and implications. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32:432–442.
Article
10. Mead S, Copeland ME. What recovery means to us: consumers’ perspectives. Community Ment Health J. 2000; 36:315–328.
11. Deegan PE. Recovery as a self-directed process of healing and transformation. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2002; 17:5–21.
Article
12. Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993; 16:11–23.
Article
13. Schrank B, Slade M. Recovery in psychiatry. Psychiatr Bull. 2007; 31:321–325.
Article
14. Slade M, Amering M, Oades L. Recovery: an international perspective. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2008; 17:128–137.
Article
15. Lysaker PH, Roe D, Buck KD. Recovery and wellness amidst schizophrenia: definitions, evidence, and the implications for clinical practice. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2010; 16:36–42.
Article
16. Leendertse JCP, Wierdsma AI, van den Berg D, Ruissen AM, Slade M, Castelein S, et al. Personal recovery in people with a psychotic disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated factors. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:622628.
Article
17. Lee JM, Kim CK. [Opinions on the recovery of outpatients with schizophrenia and their wills to recover]. Korean J Schizophr Res. 2021; 24:17–25. Korean.
Article
18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association;2013.
19. Corrigan PW, Salzer M, Ralph RO, Sangster Y, Keck L. Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30:1035–1041.
Article
20. Lim KM, Shin ES, Shim SH, Jeong YJ. [Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the recovery assessment scale(RAS) for psychiatric patients]. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2014; 14:628–638. Korean.
Article
21. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS): recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988; 24:97–99.
22. Overall JE, Klett CJ. Applied multivariate analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill;1972.
23. Eisen SV, Dill DL, Grob MC. Reliability and validity of a brief patientreport instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994; 45:242–247.
Article
24. Bae A, Hong CH, Shin J. [Validation study of the behavior and symptom identification scale(BASIS-32)]. Kor J Clin Psychol. 2011; 30:929–941. Korean.
Article
25. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30:473–483.
26. Koh SB, Chang SJ, Kang MG, Cha BS, Park JK. [Reliability and validity on measurement instrument for health status assessment in occupational workers]. J Prev Med Public Health. 1997; 30:251–266. Korean.
27. Kavanagh DJ, O’Halloran P, Manicavasagar V, Clark D, Piatkowska O, Tennant C, et al. The family attitude scale: reliability and validity of a new scale for measuring the emotional climate of families. Psychiatry Res. 1997; 70:185–195.
Article
28. Dahlem NW, Zimet GD, Walker RR. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a confirmation study. J Clin Psychol. 1991; 47:756–761.
Article
29. Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood R. A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol Med. 1983; 13:177–183.
Article
30. Marks KA, Fastenau PS, Lysaker PH, Bond GR. Self-appraisal of illness questionnaire (SAIQ): relationship to researcher-rated insight and neuropsychological function in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2000; 45:203–211.
Article
31. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press;1965. p. 125–136.
32. Kim S, Lee EH, Hwang ST, Hong SH, Lee K, Kim JH. [Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Beck hopelessness scale]. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2015; 54:84–90. Korean.
Article
33. Chon HG, Kim CK. [The reliability and validity of the Korean version of psychiatric patients’ experience of stigma in the patients with schizophrenia]. Korean J Schizophr Res. 2010; 13:34–41. Korean.
34. Taylor DM, Barnes TRE, Young AH. The Maudsley prescribing guidelines in psychiatry. 13th ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell;2018. p. 15.
35. Van Eck RM, Burger TJ, Vellinga A, Schirmbeck F, de Haan L. The relationship between clinical and personal recovery in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Schizophr Bull. 2018; 44:631–642.
Article
36. Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 199:445–452.
Article
37. Kim JG, Ahn JY, Kim CK. [Factors affecting the empowerment experienced by outpatients with schizophrenia]. Korean J Schizophr Res. 2018; 21:59–66. Korean.
Article
38. Misdrahi D, Denard S, Swendsen J, Jaussent I, Courtet P. Depression in schizophrenia: the influence of the different dimensions of insight. Psychiatry Res. 2014; 216:12–16.
Article
39. Schaub D, Brüne M, Bierhoff HW, Juckel G. Comparison of self- and clinician’s ratings of personal and social performance in patients with schizophrenia: the role of insight. Psychopathology. 2012; 45:109–116.
Article
40. Kurtz MM, Olfson RH, Rose J. Self-efficacy and functional status in schizophrenia: relationship to insight, cognition and negative symptoms. Schizophr Res. 2013; 145:69–74.
Article
41. Ho WW, Chiu MY, Lo WT, Yiu MG. Recovery components as determinants of the health-related quality of life among patients with schizophrenia: structural equation modelling analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010; 44:71–84.
Article
42. Yanos PT, Rosenfield S, Horwitz AV. Negative and supportive social interactions and quality of life among persons diagnosed with severe mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2001; 37:405–419.
Full Text Links
  • KJSR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr