J Korean Diabetes.  2024 Sep;25(3):172-176. 10.4093/jkd.2024.25.3.172.

Patient Education in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus through Continuous Glucose Monitoring Reports

• Kim HM

• KMID: 2559574
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4093/jkd.2024.25.3.172

Abstract

The number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) continues to increase. The combined effects of CGM and patient education have been demonstrated to improve glycemic control more effectively than CGM alone. Therefore, healthcare providers should analyze CGM reports and offer structured, personalized education to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Various features are frequently updated in CGM reports. Thus, healthcare providers should be skilled in using these features to improve the quality of patient care.

Keyword

Continuous glucose monitoring; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Education

Reference

1.Korean Diabetes Association. 2023 Clinical practice guide-lines for diabetes. 8th ed.Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association;2023. p. 372–80.

2.Foster NC., Beck RW., Miller KM., Clements MA., Rickels MR., DiMeglio LA, et al. State of type 1 diabetes man-agement and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019. 21:66–72.

3.Beck RW., Riddlesworth TD., Ruedy K., Ahmann A., Haller S., Kruger D., DIAMOND Study Group, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017. 167:365–74.

4.Ruedy KJ., Parkin CG., Riddlesworth TD., Graham C; DIAMOND Study Group. Continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using multiple daily injections of insulin: results from the DIAMOND trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017. 11:1138–46.

5.Yaron M., Roitman E., Aharon-Hananel G., Landau Z., Ganz T., Yanuv I, et al. Effect of flash glucose monitoring tech-nology on glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019. 42:1178–84.

6.Choe HJ., Rhee EJ., Won JC., Park KS., Lee WY., Cho YM. Effects of patient-driven lifestyle modification using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the randomized open-label PDF study. Diabetes Care. 2022. 45:2224–30.

7.Yoo HJ., An HG., Park SY., Ryu OH., Kim HY., Seo JA, et al. Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008. 82:73–9.

8.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 6. Glycemic goals and hypoglycemia: stan-dards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024. 47(Suppl 1):S111–25.

9.Battelino T., Danne T., Bergenstal RM., Amiel SA., Beck R., Biester T, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019. 42:1593–603.

10.Yamamoto JM., Murphy HR. Benefits of real-time contin-uous glucose monitoring in pregnancy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021. 23(S1):S8–14.