J Korean Med Sci.  2024 Sep;39(34):e254. 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e254.

Lack of Parental Control Is Longitudinally Associated With Higher Smartphone Addiction Tendency in Young Children: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the risk factors of young children’s smartphone addiction in a longitudinal study design. Data collected from 313 participants (mean age, 4.5 ± 0.82 years; male, 49.8%) over 4 years for Kids Cohort for Understanding of Internet Addiction Risk Factors in Early Childhood were analyzed in this study. Mixed effect models were used to evaluate the influence of various variables on the repeated measures of smartphone addiction tendency in young children over time. The multi-level analysis showed that parents’ lack of control over children’s smartphone use (t = −4.523; 95% confidence interval [CI], −7.32, −1.72), and parents’ higher smartphone addiction proneness (t = 6.340; 95% CI, 0.23, 0.440) predicted higher smartphone addiction tendency in young children. The responsibility of the parents to prevent their children from becoming addicted to smartphones should start in a very early age when they start using the smartphones.

Keyword

Smartphone Addiction; Young Children; Preschooler; Problematic Smartphone Use; Parental Control; Parental Mediation

Reference

1. Kim KM, Chung US. Emotional and behavioral correlates of exposure to electronic media in school-aged children: a prospective study. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(36):e283. PMID: 37698208.
2. Oh Y, Baek JH, Joung YS. Intelligence-dependent differential effects of media exposure on executive function changes in children: a population-based cohort study with a longitudinal design. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(48):e411. PMID: 38084030.
3. Shi X, Wang A, Zhu Y. Longitudinal associations among smartphone addiction, loneliness, and depressive symptoms in college students: disentangling between- and within-person associations. Addict Behav. 2023; 142:107676. PMID: 36878182.
4. Zhang J, Yuan G, Guo H, Zhang X, Zhang K, Lu X, et al. Longitudinal association between problematic smartphone use and sleep disorder among Chinese college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addict Behav. 2023; 144:107715. PMID: 37059002.
5. Jamir L, Duggal M, Nehra R, Singh P, Grover S. Epidemiology of technology addiction among school students in rural India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019; 40:30–38. PMID: 30716701.
6. Sohn SY, Rees P, Wildridge B, Kalk NJ, Carter B. Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and grade of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry. 2019; 19(1):356. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30606141. PMID: 31779637.
7. Lee DY, Roh HW, Kim SJ, Park EJ, Yoo H, Suh S, et al. Trends in digital media use in Korean preschool children. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(41):e263. PMID: 31650718.
8. Cho KS, Lee JM. Influence of smartphone addiction proneness of young children on problematic behaviors and emotional intelligence: mediating self-assessment effects of parents using smartphones. Comput Human Behav. 2017; 66:303–311.
9. Schmitgen MM, Horvath J, Mundinger C, Wolf ND, Sambataro F, Hirjak D, et al. Neural correlates of cue reactivity in individuals with smartphone addiction. Addict Behav. 2020; 108:106422. PMID: 32403056.
10. Huang S, Lai X, Li Y, Wang W, Zhao X, Dai X, et al. Does parental media mediation make a difference for adolescents? Evidence from an empirical cohort study of parent-adolescent dyads. Heliyon (Lond). 2023; 9(4):e14897.
11. Shin KW, Kim DI, Jung YJ, Lee J, Lee Y, Kim M. Development of Korean Smart Phone Addiction Proneness Scale for Youth and Adults. Seoul, Korea: Korean National Information Society Agency;2011.
12. Kim DI, Chung YJ, Kim BK, Jeon HJ, Lee YH. Development and validation of child smartphone addiction observer scale. Korean J Couns. 2015; 16(6):369–383.
13. Noë B, Turner LD, Linden DE, Allen SM, Winkens B, Whitaker RM. Identifying indicators of smartphone addiction through user-app interaction. Comput Human Behav. 2019; 99:56–65. PMID: 31582873.
14. Marciano L, Camerini AL. Duration, frequency, and time distortion: which is the best predictor of problematic smartphone use in adolescents? A trace data study. PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263815. PMID: 35180248.
15. Lin YH, Chiang CL, Lin PH, Chang LR, Ko CH, Lee YH, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0163010. PMID: 27846211.
16. Duke É, Montag C. Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity. Addict Behav Rep. 2017; 6:90–95. PMID: 29450241.
17. Chen B, Liu F, Ding S, Ying X, Wang L, Wen Y. Gender differences in factors associated with smartphone addiction: a cross-sectional study among medical college students. BMC Psychiatry. 2017; 17(1):341. PMID: 29017482.
18. Yang H, Ng WQ, Yang Y, Yang S. Inconsistent media mediation and problematic smartphone use in preschoolers: maternal conflict resolution styles as moderators. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(6):816. PMID: 35740753.
19. Chang FC, Chiu CH, Chen PH, Chiang JT, Miao NF, Chuang HY, et al. Children’s use of mobile devices, smartphone addiction and parental mediation in taiwan. Comput Human Behav. 2019; 93:25–32.
20. Lee EJ, Kim HS. Effect of maternal factors on problematic smartphone use among elementary school children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(17):9182. PMID: 34501780.
21. Nielsen P, Favez N, Liddle H, Rigter H. Linking parental mediation practices to adolescents’ problematic online screen use: a systematic literature review. J Behav Addict. 2019; 8(4):649–663. PMID: 31786936.
22. Lukavská K, Hrabec O, Lukavský J, Demetrovics Z, Király O. The associations of adolescent problematic internet use with parenting: a meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2022; 135:107423. PMID: 35933287.
23. Park N, Oh H. Impact of adolescent life stress and smartphone use on academic impairment: focusing on the effect of parent involvement on adolescents’ smartphone use. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2016; 16(9):590–599.
24. Lee EJ, Ogbolu Y. Does parental control work with smartphone addiction?: a cross-sectional study of children in South Korea. J Addict Nurs. 2018; 29(2):128–138. PMID: 29864060.
25. Lee EJ, Kim HS. Gender differences in smartphone addiction behaviors associated with parent-child bonding, parent-child communication, and parental mediation among Korean elementary school students. J Addict Nurs. 2018; 29(4):244–254. PMID: 30507820.
26. Chotpitayasunondh V, Douglas KM. How “phubbing” becomes the norm: the antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Comput Human Behav. 2016; 63:9–18.
27. Xie X, Chen W, Zhu X, He D. Parents’ phubbing increases adolescents’ mobile phone addiction: roles of parent-child attachment, deviant peers, and gender. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019; 105:104426.
28. Gong J, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liang Z, Hao J, Su L, et al. How parental smartphone addiction affects adolescent smartphone addiction: the effect of the parent-child relationship and parental bonding. J Affect Disord. 2022; 307:271–277. PMID: 35398105.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr