Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2024 Aug;28(3):358-363. 10.14701/ahbps.24-016.

Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of General Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  • 2Department of General Surgery, AIMS, Mohali, India

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.
Methods
A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.
Results
The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice (p = 0.667), abdominal pain (p = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m 2 (p = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, p = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, p = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, p = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 (p = 0.97) and POD3 (p = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (p ≥ 0.99) and grade B (p = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar (p = 0.89).
Conclusions
An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.

Keyword

Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Pancreatic fistula

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A flowchart of the participant selection of the study. OW, ommental wrap.

  • Fig. 2 Pancreaticojejunostomy being performed.

  • Fig. 3 Omentum division being performed for roll-up.

  • Fig. 4 Completed omental roll-up around the pancreaticojejunostomy site.


Reference

References

1. Kaman L, Chakarbathi K, Gupta A, Dahiya D, Singh K, Ramavath K, et al. 2019; Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on immediate surgical outcome in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Updates Surg. 71:653–657. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00625-4. PMID: 30673978.
2. Sofia X, Alexandros A, Elias A, Anna D, George C, Emmanuel C. 2017; Omental roll up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy (in Whipple/Traverso procedure) decreases the formation of pancreatic fistula-a prospective consecutive case series. JOP J Pancreas. 18:138–143.
3. Kapoor VK, Sharma A, Behari A, Singh RK. 2006; Omental flaps in pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP. 7:608–615.
4. Jiang Y, Chen Q, Wang Z, Shao Y, Hu C, Ding Y, et al. 2021; The prognostic value of external vs internal pancreatic duct stents in CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Surg. 34:738–746. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1691687. PMID: 32093527.
5. Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P, Huang W, Ke NW, Hu WM, et al. 2014; Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 101:1196–1208. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9553. PMID: 25042895.
6. Sun X, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Lou Y, Fu Q, Zhang X, et al. 2016; Meta-analysis of invagination and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an update. Int J Surg. 36:240–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.008. PMID: 27826046.
7. Jang JY, Chang YR, Kim SW, Choi SH, Park SJ, Lee SE, et al. 2016; Randomized multicentre trial comparing external and internal pancreatic stenting during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 103:668–675. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10160. PMID: 27040594.
8. Kurosaki I, Hatakeyama K. 2004; Omental wrapping of skeletonized major vessels after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int Surg. 89:90–94.
9. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. 2017; The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 161:584–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. PMID: 28040257.
10. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. 2009; The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 250:187–196. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PMID: 19638912.
11. Hosotani R, Doi R, Imamura M. 2002; Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy reduces the risk of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 26:99–104. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0188-z. PMID: 11898041.
12. Liang H, Wu JG, Wang F, Chen BX, Zou ST, Wang C, et al. 2021; Choice of operative method for pancreaticojejunostomy and a multivariable study of pancreatic leakage in pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 13:1405–1413. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1405. PMID: 34950429. PMCID: PMC8649563.
13. Do You D, Paik KY, Park IY, Yoo YK. 2019; Randomized controlled study of the effect of octreotide on pancreatic exocrine secretion and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Asian J Surg. 42:458–463. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.08.006. PMID: 30262436.
14. Shrikhande SV, Shinde RS, Chaudhari VA, Kurunkar SR, Desouza AL, Agarwal V, et al. 2020; Twelve hundred consecutive pancreato-duodenectomies from single centre: impact of centre of excellence on pancreatic cancer surgery across India. World J Surg. 44:2784–2793. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05235-0. PMID: 31641837.
15. Maeda A, Ebata T, Kanemoto H, Matsunaga K, Bando E, Yamaguchi S, et al. 2005; Omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy for protection of splanchnic vessels. World J Surg. 29:1122–1126. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7900-3. PMID: 16132400.
16. Ozben V, Aytac E, Liu X, Ozuner G. 2016; Does omental pedicle flap reduce anastomotic leak and septic complications after rectal cancer surgery? Int J Surg. 27:53–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.070. PMID: 26774891.
17. Yoshida N, Eto K, Matsumoto T, Kosumi K, Imamura Y, Iwatsuki M, et al. 2023; Omental flap wrapping around the esophagogastric anastomosis and association with anastomotic leak in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 236:189–197. DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000454. PMID: 36205406.
18. Ramia JM, de la Plaza R, Adel F, Ramiro C, Arteaga V, Garcia-Parreño J. 2014; Wrapping in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 84:921–924. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12491. PMID: 25720806.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr