Clin Endosc.  2024 Jul;57(4):501-507. 10.5946/ce.2023.229.

Endoscopic management of giant colonic polyps: a retrospective Italian study

Affiliations
  • 1Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Santobono-Pausilipon Children’s Hospital, Naples, Italy
  • 2Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • 3NESMOS Department, Pediatric Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • 4Hepatogastroenterology Division, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy

Abstract

Background/Aims
Polyps greater than 30 mm are classified as “giants”. Their endoscopic removal represents a technical challenge. The choice of the endoscopic removal technique is important because it provides a resection sample for precise histopathological staging. This is pivotal for diagnostic, prognostic, and management purposes.
Methods
From a retrospective analysis, we obtained a sample of 38 giant polyps. Eighteen polypectomies were performed using the epinephrine volume reduction (EVR) method, nine polypectomies utilized endo-looping or clipping methods, and 11 patients underwent surgery.
Results
We obtained en bloc resection with the EVR method in all cases; histology confirmed the correct indication for endoscopic resection in all cases. Moreover, no early or delayed complications were observed, and no patient required hospitalization. Using endo-looping or clipping methods, we observed advanced histology in 1/9 (11.1%) cases, while another patient (1/9, 11.1%) had delayed bleeding. Among patients who underwent surgery, 5/11 (45.5%) were deemed overtreated and three had post-surgical complications.
Conclusions
We propose EVR as an alternative technique for giant polyp resection due to its safety, effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and the advantage of avoiding the need to postpone polypectomy to a later time. Further prospective studies might help improve this experience and enhance the technique.

Keyword

Endoscopic removal; Polypectomy; Polyps

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Endoscopic images of the epinephrine volume reduction techniques. (A) A giant pedunculated polyp in sigmoid colon. (B) Epinephrine volume reduction. (C) One time polypectomy.


Cited by  1 articles

Endoscopic approaches for the management of giant colonic polyps
Yunho Jung
Clin Endosc. 2024;57(4):468-470.    doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.130.


Reference

1. Coverlizza S, Risio M, Ferrari A, et al. Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. Pathologic assessment of lymph node metastatic potential. Cancer. 1989; 64:1937–1947.
Article
2. Cannon-Albright LA, Bishop DT, Samowitz W, et al. Colonic polyps in an unselected population: prevalence, characteristics, and associations. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994; 89:827–831.
3. Fong TV, Chuah SK, Chiou SS, et al. Correlation of the morphology and size of colonic polyps with their histology. Chang Gung Med J. 2003; 26:339–343.
4. Choi YS, Lee JB, Lee EJ, et al. Can endoscopic submucosal dissection technique be an alternative treatment option for a difficult giant (≥ 30 mm) pedunculated colorectal polyp? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 56:660–666.
Article
5. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58(6 Suppl):S3–S43.
6. Kudo S, Rubio CA, Teixeira CR, et al. Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy. 2001; 33:367–373.
Article
7. dos Santos CE, Lima JC, Lopes CV, et al. Computerized virtual chromoendoscopy versus indigo carmine chromoendoscopy combined with magnification for diagnosis of small colorectal lesions: a randomized and prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 22:1364–1371.
8. Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 44:8–14.
Article
9. Fujii T, Hasegawa RT, Saitoh Y, et al. Chromoscopy during colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001; 33:1036–1041.
Article
10. Sano Y, Emura F, Ikemats H. Narrow band imaging. In : Waye JD, Rex DK, Williams CB, editors. Colonoscopy: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell;2009. p. 514–526.
11. Kanao H, Tanaka S, Oka S, et al. Narrow-band imaging magnification predicts the histology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(3 Pt 2):631–636.
Article
12. Wada Y, Kudo SE, Kashida H, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70:522–531.
Article
13. Naini BV, Odze RD. Advanced precancerous lesions (APL) in the colonic mucosa. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013; 27:235–256.
Article
14. Kudo Se, Lambert R, Allen JI, et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68(4 Suppl):S3–S47.
Article
15. Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: an Italian multicenter observational study. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:279–285.
Article
16. O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98:371–379.
17. Stulc JP, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L, et al. Colorectal villous and tubulovillous adenomas equal to or greater than four centimeters. Ann Surg. 1988; 207:65–71.
Article
18. Fung CH, Goldman H. The incidence and significance of villous change in adenomatous polyps. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970; 53:21–25.
Article
19. Boyce HW Jr. “Malignant” colon polyps: pathologist’s obligation and clinician’s dilemma. Gastrointest Endosc. 1980; 26:56–57.
20. Fenoglio CM, Haggitt RC, Hamilton SR, et al. Colonic dysplasia. Pathol Annu. 1981; 16 Pt 1:181–213.
21. Pigò F, Bertani H, Grande G, et al. Post-polypectomy bleeding after colonoscopy on uninterrupted aspirin/non steroideal antiflammatory drugs: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2018; 50:20–26.
Article
22. Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: an experience with 1,555 polypectomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986; 29:825–830.
23. Smith LE. Fiberoptic colonoscopy: complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1976; 19:407–412.
24. Webb WA, McDaniel L, Jones L. Experience with 1000 colonoscopic polypectomies. Ann Surg. 1985; 201:626–632.
Article
25. Gibbs DH, Opelka FG, Beck DE, et al. Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39:806–810.
Article
26. von Delius S, Thies P, Umgelter A, et al. Hemodynamics after endoscopic submucosal injection of epinephrine in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a matter of concern. Endoscopy. 2006; 38:1284–1288.
Article
27. Paspatis GA, Paraskeva K, Theodoropoulou A, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of adrenaline injection in combination with detachable snare versus adrenaline injection alone in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:2805.
Article
28. Di Giorgio P, De Luca L, Calcagno G, et al. Detachable snare versus epinephrine injection in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding: a randomized and controlled study. Endoscopy. 2004; 36:860–863.
Article
29. Hachisu T. A new detachable snare for hemostasis in the removal of large polyps or other elevated lesions. Surg Endosc. 1991; 5:70–74.
Article
30. Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Narahara H, et al. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colorectal polyps using a detachable snare. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 44:594–597.
Article
31. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Takakuwa H, et al. Ineffective use of a detachable snare for colonoscopic polypectomy of large polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47:496–499.
Article
32. Dobrowolski S, Dobosz M, Babicki A, et al. Prophylactic submucosal saline-adrenaline injection in colonoscopic polypectomy: prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18:990–993.
Article
33. Kouklakis G, Mpoumponaris A, Gatopoulou A, et al. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:2732–2737.
Article
34. Hogan RB, Hogan RB 3rd. Epinephrine volume reduction of giant colon polyps facilitates endoscopic assessment and removal. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:1018–1022.
Article
35. Inoue Y, Tezuka T, Shinohara T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc. 2004; 16:91–94.
Article
36. Park Y, Jeon TJ, Park JY, et al. Comparison of clipping with and without epinephrine injection for the prevention of post-polypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colon polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 30:1499–1506.
Article
37. Lee SH, Lee KS, Park YS, et al. Submucosal saline-epinephrine injection in colon polypectomy: appropriate indication. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008; 55:1589–1593.
38. Shioji K, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi M, et al. Prophylactic clip application does not decrease delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57:691–694.
Article
39. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017; 49:270–297.
Article
40. Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992; 15:347–351.
41. Hsieh YH, Lin HJ, Tseng GY, et al. Is submucosal epinephrine injection necessary before polypectomy?: a prospective, comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001; 48:1379–1382.
42. Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, et al. Endoloop-assisted polypectomy for large pedunculated colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20:1257–1261.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr