J Neurocrit Care.  2024 Jun;17(1):1-6. 10.18700/jnc.240001.

Rapid versus gradual external ventricular drain weaning: a general review of best practices

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Clinical Sciences, Ross University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, Barbados
  • 2Department of Clinical Sciences, St. George’s University, True Blue, Grenada
  • 3Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

Abstract

Rapid versus gradual external ventricular drain (EVD) weaning methods have been widely debated, aiming to establish a standard clinical practice. The techniques used in each approach offer their own set of benefits and associated risks. Many published works continue to deliberate and dispute each other on the topic, as many believe gradual weaning is preferable due to its perceived potential to decrease ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) dependency. In contrast, rapid weaning is known to have benefits such as a reduction in ventriculostomy-associated infections. Additionally, both weaning methods have been further debated due to the perception of the risks associated, which for gradual weaning includes a longer hospital stay. This literature review explores both sides of this debate, providing pros and cons to each weaning method to better unify the disconnect within the field. Based on the current research available, it is clear that due to a lengthy and more consistent list of benefits as well as overall decreased associated risks, rapid weaning is the superior form of EVD treatment method and should become the standard for clinical practice when performing EVDs on patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages.

Keyword

External ventricular drain; Neurology; Neurosurgery; Weaning; Rapid weaning; Gradual weaning

Reference

1. Rao SS, Chung DY, Wolcott Z, Sheriff F, Khawaja AM, Lee H, et al. Intermittent CSF drainage and rapid EVD weaning approach after subarachnoid hemorrhage: association with fewer VP shunts and shorter length of stay. J Neurosurg. 2019; 132:1583–8.
2. Capion T, Lilja-Cyron A, Juhler M, Mathiesen TI, Wetterslev J. Prompt closure versus gradual weaning of external ventricular drainage for hydrocephalus in adult patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020; 10:e040722.
3. Kuo LT, Huang AP. The pathogenesis of hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22:5050.
4. Chung DY, Thompson BB, Kumar MA, Mahta A, Rao SS, Lai JH, et al. Association of external ventricular drain wean strategy with shunt placement and length of stay in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective multicenter study. Neurocrit Care. 2022; 36:536–45.
5. Chung DY, Mayer SA, Rordorf GA. External ventricular drains after subarachnoid hemorrhage: is less more? Neurocrit Care. 2018; 28:157–61.
6. Ebel F, Lichter E, Mariani L, Guzman R, Soleman J. Rapid versus gradual weaning of external ventricular drain: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2023; 39:250–9.
7. Capion T, Lilja-Cyron A, Olsen MH, Juhler M, Møller K, Sorteberg A, et al. Prompt closure versus gradual weaning of external ventricular drainage for hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: protocol for the DRAIN randomised clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023; 67:1121–7.
8. Munakomi S, Das JM. Intracranial pressure monitoring. StatPearls Publishing;2023.
9. Nag DS, Sahu S, Swain A, Kant S. Intracranial pressure monitoring: gold standard and recent innovations. World J Clin Cases. 2019; 7:1535–53.
10. Jabbarli R, Pierscianek D, RÖlz R, Reinhard M, Darkwah Oppong M, Scheiwe C, et al. Gradual external ventricular drainage weaning reduces the risk of shunt dependency after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pooled analysis. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018; 15:498–504.
11. Fried HI, Nathan BR, Rowe AS, Zabramski JM, Andaluz N, Bhimraj A, et al. The insertion and management of external ventricular drains: an evidence-based consensus statement. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care. 2016; 24:61–81.
12. Klopfenstein JD, Kim LJ, Feiz-Erfan I, Hott JS, Goslar P, Zabramski JM, et al. Comparison of rapid and gradual weaning from external ventricular drainage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective randomized trial. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100:225–9.
13. Konovalov A, Shekhtman O, Pilipenko Y, Okishev D, Ershova O, Oshorov A, et al. External ventricular drainage in patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage after microsurgical clipping: our 2006-2018 experience and a literature review. Cureus. 2021; 13:e12951.
14. Palasz J, D'Antona L, Farrell S, Elborady MA, Watkins LD, Toma AK. External ventricular drain management in subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2022; 45:365–73.
15. Marfil-Garza BA, Belaunzarán-Zamudio PF, Gulias-Herrero A, Zuñiga AC, Caro-Vega Y, Kershenobich-Stalnikowitz D, et al. Risk factors associated with prolonged hospital length-of-stay: 18-year retrospective study of hospitalizations in a tertiary healthcare center in Mexico. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0207203.
16. Hamilton MG. Editorial: weaning external ventricular drains after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: how should we measure success? Neurosurg Focus. 2023; 54:E4.
17. Rubinos C, Kwon SB, Megjhani M, Terilli K, Wong B, Cespedes L, et al. Predicting shunt dependency from the effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on ventricular size. Neurocrit Care. 2022; 37:670–7.
18. Yuen J, Selbi W, Muquit S, Berei T. Complication rates of external ventricular drain insertion by surgeons of different experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018; 100:221–5.
19. Chung DY, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Patel AB, Rordorf GA. Management of external ventricular drains after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multi-institutional survey. Neurocrit Care. 2017; 26:356–61.
20. Harris L, Munakomi S. Ventriculitis. StatPearls Publishing;2023.
21. Hagel S, Bruns T, Pletz MW, Engel C, Kalff R, Ewald C. External ventricular drain infections: risk factors and outcome. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2014; 2014:708531.
22. Tipton K, Leas BF, Mull NK, Siddique SM, Greysen R, Lane-Fall MB, et al. Interventions to decrease hospital length of stay. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;2021.
23. Muralidharan R. External ventricular drains: management and complications. Surg Neurol Int. 2015; 6:S271–4.
Full Text Links
  • JNC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr