J Minim Invasive Surg.  2024 Jun;27(2):55-71. 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.2.55.

Propensity score matching for comparative studies: a tutorial with R and Rex

Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Well-Aging Medicare & CSU G-LAMP Project Group, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea
  • 2Department of Public Health Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 4RexSoft Inc., Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Biomedical Science, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea
  • 6Gwangju Alzheimer’s & Related Dementia Cohort Research Center, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea

Abstract

Recently, there has been considerable progress in developing new technologies and equipment for the medical field, including minimally invasive surgeries. Evaluating the effectiveness of these treatments requires study designs like randomized controlled trials. However, due to the nature of certain treatments, randomization is not always feasible, leading to the use of observational studies. The effect size estimated from observational studies is subject to selection bias caused by confounders. One method to reduce this bias is propensity scoring. This study aimed to introduce a propensity score matching process between two groups using a practical example with R. Additionally, Rex, an Excel add-in graphical user interface statistical program, is provided for researchers unfamiliar with R programming. Further techniques, such as matching with three or more groups, propensity score weighting and stratification, and imputation of missing values, are summarized to offer approaches for more complex studies not covered in this tutorial.

Keyword

Propensity score; Matching; Selection bias; R; Rex
Full Text Links
  • JMIS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr