Chonnam Med J.  2024 Jan;60(1):59-68. 10.4068/cmj.2024.60.1.59.

The Effects of Coenzyme Q10 on Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  • 2Department of Cardiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  • 4Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  • 5Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Medicinal Plants and Natural Products, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  • 7Infectious disease Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Abstract

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a frequent challenge following the injection of contrast media and its subsequent oxidative stress. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the preventive effects of coenzyme Q10 (Q10), as a mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant in CI-AKI in diabetic patients, who account for a large proportion of angiographic cases. A total of 118 diabetic patients were randomly assigned to receive 120 mg of oral coenzyme Q10 (Q10 group) or placebo (Placebo group) for four days, starting 24 hours before contrast media injection. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum and urinary creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary malondialdehyde (UMDA), urinary total antioxidant capacity (UTAC), and urinary mitochondrial to nuclearDNA ratios (mtDNA/nDNA ratio) were evaluated before and after the treatment period. Urine sediments were also evaluated to report the urine microscopy score (UMS).The levels of BUN, serum and urine creatinine, and UMS were similar in the Q10 and placebo groups. EGFR was lower in the Q10 group before the treatment (p=0.013) but not after. The urinary mtDNA/nDNA ratio was 3.05±1.68 and 3.69±2.58 in placebo and Q10 groups, but UTAC was found to be lower in Q10 both before (p=0.006) and after the treatment (p<0.001). The incidence of CI-AKI was 14.40% and the mtDNA/nNDA ratio was similar between CI-AKI and non-CI-AKI patients. In conclusion, Q10 treatment shows no favorable effect on prevention of CI-AKI or a urinary mtDNA/nDNA ratio among diabetic patients.

Keyword

Coenzyme Q10; Acute Kidney Injury; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Mitochondrial DNA
Full Text Links
  • CMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr