Ann Surg Treat Res.  2024 May;106(5):243-247. 10.4174/astr.2024.106.5.243.

An institutional experience of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring application in robotic thyroidectomy: a retrospective case-control study

• Lee JH
• Kwon H

• KMID: 2555720
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.106.5.243

Abstract

Purpose
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been introduced in thyroid surgery to prevent injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). However, its effectiveness remains controversial in robotic thyroidectomy (RT). This study aimed to compare the surgical outcome of RT in patients with and without the application of IONM.
Methods
This retrospective case-control study included 100 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy via robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach in a tertiary center. A study group of 50 patients who had IONM during RT was compared to a control group of 50 patients who underwent RT with nerve visualization alone.
Results
The sex ratio (4:45 vs. 7:43, P = 0.538), mean age (39.3 ± 7.1 years vs. 37.5 ± 10.4 years, P = 0.304), and body mass index (23.1 ± 2.6 kg/m² vs. 22.2 ± 3.9 kg/m² , P = 0.215) were comparable between the IONM and control groups. Pathologic features including tumor size (0.8 cm vs. 0.9 cm, P = 0.283), extrathyroidal extension (58.0% vs. 24.0%, P = 0.316), lymph node metastasis (30% vs. 34%, P = 0.668), and number of lymph nodes (5.3 vs. 5.3, P = 0.668) showed no differences. There was no permanent RLN palsy, postoperative bleeding, and wound complications. Transient hypoparathyroidism was observed in 12 (24.0%) and 14 (28.0%), permanent hypoparathyroidism in 0 (0%) and 1 (2.0%), and transient RLN palsy was observed in 3 (6.0%) and 3 (6.0%), respectively.
Conclusion
We did not demonstrate a clear advantage of IONM in RT. Controversies regarding the effectiveness of IONM is not closed.

Keyword

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; Recurrent laryngeal nerve; Robotic surgical procedures; Thyroidectomy

Reference

1. Jackson NR, Yao L, Tufano RP, Kandil EH. Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: meta-analysis and systematic review. Head Neck. 2014; 36:137–143. PMID: 23471784.

2. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009; 146:1048–1055. PMID: 19879615.

3. Lee KE, Rao J, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009; 19:e71–e75. PMID: 19542833.

4. Kwon H, Yi JW, Song RY, Chai YJ, Kim SJ, Choi JY, et al. Comparison of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy with open thyroidectomy for Graves’ disease. World J Surg. 2016; 40:498–504. PMID: 26754077.

5. Kim MJ, Nam KH, Lee SG, Choi JB, Kim TH, Lee CR, et al. Yonsei experience of 5000 gasless transaxillary robotic thyroidectomies. World J Surg. 2018; 42:393–401. PMID: 28879559.

6. Pan JH, Zhou H, Zhao XX, Ding H, Wei L, Qin L, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:3985–4001. PMID: 28337546.

7. Son SK, Kim JH, Bae JS, Lee SH. Surgical safety and oncologic effectiveness in robotic versus conventional open thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:3022–3032. PMID: 25634780.

8. Lang BH, Wong CK, Tsang JS, Wong KP, Wan KY. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgically-related complications between robotic-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21:850–861. PMID: 24271160.

9. Dionigi G, Wu CW, Kim HY, Rausei S, Boni L, Chiang FY. Severity of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries in thyroid surgery. World J Surg. 2016; 40:1373–1381. PMID: 26817650.

10. Dionigi G, Kim HY, Wu CW, Lavazza M, Materazzi G, Lombardi CP, et al. Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Updates Surg. 2017; 69:171–179. PMID: 28439772.

11. Lörincz BB, Möckelmann N, Busch CJ, Hezel M, Knecht R. Automatic periodic stimulation of the vagus nerve during single-incision transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy: feasibility, safety, and first cases. Head Neck. 2016; 38:482–485. PMID: 26540014.

12. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, Lulli P, Rossi ED, Fadda G, et al. Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional surgery. Head Neck. 2005; 27:58–64. PMID: 15459914.

13. Terris DJ, Anderson SK, Watts TL, Chin E. Laryngeal nerve monitoring and minimally invasive thyroid surgery: complementary technologies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133:1254–1257. PMID: 18086968.

14. Yang S, Zhou L, Lu Z, Ma B, Ji Q, Wang Y. Systematic review with meta-analysis of intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroidectomy. Int J Surg. 2017; 39:104–113. PMID: 28130189.

15. Lee HY, Lee JY, Dionigi G, Bae JW, Kim HY. The efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring during robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective, randomized case-control evaluation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015; 25:908–914. PMID: 26575249.

16. Bae DS, Kim SJ. Intraoperative neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in robotic thyroid surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015; 25:23–26. PMID: 25238177.

17. Kim SJ, Lee KE, Oh BM, Oh EM, Bae DS, Choi JY, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve during robotic thyroid surgery: a preliminary prospective study. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 89:233–239. PMID: 26576402.

18. Ji YB, Ko SH, Song CM, Sung ES, Lee BJ, Wu CW, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of intraoperative neural monitoring in remote access robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy. Oral Oncol. 2020; 103:104617. PMID: 32126516.

19. Lee KE, Kim E, Koo do H, Choi JY, Kim KH, Youn YK. Robotic thyroidectomy by bilateral axillo-breast approach: review of 1,026 cases and surgical completeness. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27:2955–2962. PMID: 23436099.

20. Kandil E, Hammad AY, Walvekar RR, Hu T, Masoodi H, Mohamed SE, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy versus nonrobotic approaches: a meta-analysis examining surgical outcomes. Surg Innov. 2016; 23:317–325. PMID: 26525401.

21. Chang EH, Kim HY, Koh YW, Chung WY. Overview of robotic thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2017; 6:218–228. PMID: 28713692.

22. Terris DJ, Chaung K, Duke WS. Continuous vagal nerve monitoring is dangerous and should not routinely be done during thyroid surgery. World J Surg. 2015; 39:2471–2476. PMID: 26138874.