Investig Clin Urol.  2024 May;65(3):248-255. 10.4111/icu.20230313.

Comparative analysis of recurrence rates between intravesical gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette–Guérin induction therapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumors in patients with intermediate- and high-risk bladder cancer: A retrospective multicenter study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea.
  • 2Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  • 3Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
  • 4Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Urology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 6Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea.

Abstract

Purpose
This study investigated the efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine as an alternative to bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) therapy.
Materials and Methods
Data were retrospectively collected across seven institutions from February 1999 to May 2023. Inclusion criteria included patients with intermediate- or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) and received at least four sessions of intravesical gemcitabine or BCG induction therapy. Patient characteristics, complete remission (CR), occurrence, and progression rates were compared.
Results
In total, 149 patients were included in this study (gemcitabine, 63; BCG, 86). No differences were apparent between the two groups in baseline characteristics, except for the follow-up period (gemcitabine, 9.2±5.9 months vs. BCG, 43.9±41.4 months, p<0.001). There were no consistent significant differences observed between the two groups in the 3-month (gemcitabine, 98.4% vs. BCG, 95.3%; p=0.848), 6-month (94.9% vs. 90.0%, respectively; p=0.793) and 1-year CR rates (84.2% vs. 83.3%, respectively; p=0.950). Also, there was no significant statistical difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (p=0.953). The occurrence rates of adverse events were similar between the groups (22.2% vs. 22.1%; p=0.989); however, the rate of Clavien– Dindo grade 2 or higher was significantly higher in the BCG group (1.6% vs. 16.3%, respectively; p<0.001).
Conclusions
Intravesical gemcitabine demonstrated efficacy comparable to BCG therapy for the first year in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. However, long-term follow-up studies are warranted.

Keyword

Bladder neoplasms; Gemcitabine; Mycobacterium bovis
Full Text Links
  • ICU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr