Healthc Inform Res.  2024 Apr;30(2):154-161. 10.4258/hir.2024.30.2.154.

Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in Healthcare Facilities in the Emirate of Dubai

• Abdulrahman M
• El-Hassan O
• Redha MAA
• Almalki M

• KMID: 2555215
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.2.154

Abstract

Objectives
This paper aimed to assess the adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) in healthcare facilities in Dubai, the largest city in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and a location where extensive healthcare services are provided. It explored the challenges, milestones, and accomplishments associated with this process.
Methods
A situation analysis was conducted by contacting 2,089 healthcare facilities in Dubai to determine whether they had implemented EMR in their medical practices and to identify the challenges they faced during this process. Additionally, the Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) was utilized to measure the maturity level of hospitals in terms of EMR adoption. The EMRAM stages were rated on a scale from 0 to 7, with 0 representing the least mature stage and 7 the most mature.
Results
By September 2023, all hospitals (100%, n = 54) and 75% of private clinics (n = 1,460) in Dubai had implemented EMRs. Several challenges were identified, including the absence of EMRs within the healthcare facility, having an EMR with a low EMRAM score, or the lack of a unified interoperability standard. Additionally, the absence of a clear licensing program for EMR vendors, whether standalone or cloud-based, was among the other challenges noted.
Conclusions
EMR implementation in healthcare facilities in Dubai is at a mature stage. However, further efforts are required at both the decision-making and technical levels. We believe that our experience can benefit other countries in the region in implementing EMRs and using EMRAM to assess their health information systems.

Keyword

Electronic Medical Records, Health Information Systems, Digital Health, Middle East, Health Facilities

Reference

References

1. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? [Internet]. Washington (DC): HealthIT.gov;2019. [cited at 2024 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr.

2. Kharrazi H, Gonzalez CP, Lowe KB, Huerta TR, Ford EW. Forecasting the maturation of electronic health record functions among US hospitals: retrospective analysis and predictive model. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(8):e10458. https://doi.org/10.2196/10458.

3. AlSadrah SA. Electronic medical records and health care promotion in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2020; 41(6):583–9. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2020.6.25115.

4. Musa S, Dergaa I, Al Shekh Yasin R, Singh R. The impact of training on electronic health records related knowledge, practical competencies, and staff satisfaction: a pre-post intervention study among wellness center providers in a primary health-care facility. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:1551–63. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S414200.

5. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011; 4:47–55. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S12985.

6. Kanakubo T, Kharrazi H. Comparing the trends of electronic health record adoption among hospitals of the United States and Japan. J Med Syst. 2019; 43(7):224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1361-y.

7. Martin G, Clarke J, Liew F, Arora S, King D, Aylin P, et al. Evaluating the impact of organisational digital maturity on clinical outcomes in secondary care in England. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0118-9.

8. Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Grant J, Collins R, Staib A, Sullivan C. Digitising an Australian university hospital: qualitative analysis of staff-reported impacts. Aust Health Rev. 2020; 44(5):677–89. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH18218.

9. Johnston DS. Digital maturity: are we ready to use technology in the NHS? Future Healthc J. 2017; 4(3):189–92. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-189.

10. Krasuska M, Williams R, Sheikh A, Franklin BD, Heeney C, Lane W, et al. Technological capabilities to assess digital excellence in hospitals in high performing health care systems: international eDelphi exercise. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e17022. https://doi.org/10.2196/17022.

11. Carvalho JV, Rocha A, Abreu A. Maturity models of healthcare information systems and technologies: a literature review. J Med Syst. 2016; 40(6):131. https://doi.org/1007/s10916-016-0486-5.

12. Duncan R, Eden R, Woods L, Wong I, Sullivan C. Synthesizing dimensions of digital maturity in hospitals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(3):e32994. https://doi.org/10.2196/32994.

13. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Inc. (HIMSS). Digital health transformation: Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) [Internet]. Chicago (IL): HIMSS;c2024. [cited at 2024 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.himss.org/whatwe-do-solutions/maturity-models-emram.

14. Levene LS, Seidu S, Greenhalgh T, Khunti K. Pandemic threatens primary care for long term conditions. BMJ. 2020; 371:m3793. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3793.

15. AbdulRahman M, Al-Tahri F, AlMehairi MK, Carrick FR, Aldallal AM. Digital health technology for remote care in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from Dubai. Telemed J E Health. 2022; 28(8):1100–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0459.

16. Ellingsen G, Christensen B, Hertzum M. Persuasion tactics in the implementation of large-scale EHR suites in public healthcare. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021; 286:33–7. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210632.

17. Ellingsen G, Hertzum M, Christensen B, Wynn R. National integration components challenge the epic implementation in Central Norway. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022; 294:500–4. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220509.

18. Wu Z, Xuan S, Xie J, Lin C, Lu C. How to ensure the confidentiality of electronic medical records on the cloud: a technical perspective. Comput Biol Med. 2022; 147:105726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105726.

19. Kharrazi H, Lasser EC, Yasnoff WA, Loonsk J, Advani A, Lehmann HP, et al. A proposed national research and development agenda for population health informatics: summary recommendations from a national expert workshop. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(1):2–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv210.

20. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2021. [cited at 2024 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases.

21. Health Level Seven International. HL7 Standards [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Level Seven International;c2024. [cited at 2024 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.hl7.org/.

22. Liang J, Li Y, Zhang Z, Shen D, Xu J, Zheng X, et al. Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in China during the past 10 years: consecutive survey data analysis and comparison of Sino-American challenges and experiences. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(2):e24813. https://doi.org/10.2196/24813.