J Korean Med Assoc.  2012 Aug;55(8):711-719. 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.8.711.

A clinical research strategy using longitudinal observational data in the post-electronic health records era

• Park RW

• KMID: 1435177
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.8.711

Abstract

Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) is increasing worldwide. The worldwide EHR adoption rate is estimated to be around 9% to 12%. Thus, the accumulation of medical records in electronic form is also sharply increasing and is expected to be a precious asset for clinical research. Longitudinal observational studies based on EHRs are also increasing. Observational studies covering more than a million people are not rare at present. However, much of the current EHR data are equivalent in form to those of paper records, but are just stored in electronic stor-age devices, rather than as electronic data that can be transferred and shared without loss of clinical semantics. Current EHR systems must be improved in many ways to be used for anal-yses to yield important clinical knowledge. These improvements, which are addressed in this review, include the adoption of clinical data warehouses, use of controlled vocabulary, avoidance of personal/departmental research databases, a standardized interface of many diagnostic devices with the EHR system, control of time-stamp granularity, preparedness for whole-genome sequencing of every patient, confederation or consolidation of multi-institutional EHR data, protection of privacy and confidentiality, and an education system for clinical informaticians.

Keyword

Electronic health records; Data warehouse; Medical informatics; Longitudinal observation study

MeSH Terms

Adoption
Confidentiality
Electronic Health Records
Electronics
Electrons
Humans
Medical Informatics
Medical Records
Privacy
Semantics
Vocabulary, Controlled

Reference

1. Ray WA, Murray KT, Hall K, Arbogast PG, Stein CM. Azithromycin and the risk of cardiovascular death. N Engl J Med. 2012. 366:1881–1890.

2. Yoon D, Chang BC, Kang SW, Bae H, Park RW. Adoption of electronic health records in Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2012. 81:196–203.

3. Park RW, Shin SS, Choi YI, Ahn JO, Hwang SC. Computerized physician order entry and electronic medical record systems in Korean teaching and general hospitals: results of a 2004 survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005. 12:642–647.

4. Yoon D, Park MY, Choi NK, Park BJ, Kim JH, Park RW. Detection of adverse drug reaction signals using an electronic health records database: Comparison of the Laboratory Extreme Abnormality Ratio (CLEAR) algorithm. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012. 91:467–474.

5. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, Blumenthal D. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009. 360:1628–1638.

6. Hubner U, Ammenwerth E, Flemming D, Schaubmayr C, Sellemann B. IT adoption of clinical information systems in Austrian and German hospitals: results of a comparative survey with a focus on nursing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010. 10:8.

7. Yasunaga H, Imamura T, Yamaki S, Endo H. Computerizing medical records in Japan. Int J Med Inform. 2008. 77:708–713.

8. Park MY, Yoon D, Lee K, Kang SY, Park I, Lee SH, Kim W, Kam HJ, Lee YH, Kim JH, Park RW. A novel algorithm for detection of adverse drug reaction signals using a hospital electronic medical record database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011. 20:598–607.

9. Sheen SS, Choi JE, Park RW, Kim EY, Lee YH, Kang UG. Overdose rate of drugs requiring renal dose adjustment: data analysis of 4 years prescriptions at a tertiary teaching hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 2008. 23:423–428.

10. Lee SM, Park RW. Basic concepts and principles of data mining in clinical practice. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 2009. 15:175–189.

11. Han J, Kamber M. Han J, Kamber M, editors. Data warehouse and OLAP technology for data mining. Data mining: concepts and techniques. 2001. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers;39–43.

12. Prather JC, Lobach DF, Goodwin LK, Hales JW, Hage ML, Hammond WE. Medical data mining: knowledge discovery in a clinical data warehouse. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997. 101–105.

13. Friedman C, Hripcsak G, Shagina L, Liu H. Representing information in patient reports using natural language processing and the extensible markup language. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999. 6:76–87.

14. Meystre SM, Haug PJ. Randomized controlled trial of an automated problem list with improved sensitivity. Int J Med Inform. 2008. 77:602–612.

15. Xu H, Stenner SP, Doan S, Johnson KB, Waitman LR, Denny JC. MedEx: a medication information extraction system for clinical narratives. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010. 17:19–24.

16. Haerian K, Varn D, Vaidya S, Ena L, Chase HS, Friedman C. Detection of pharmacovigilance-related adverse events using electronic health records and automated methods. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012. 92:228–234.

17. Hripcsak G, Friedman C, Alderson PO, DuMouchel W, Johnson SB, Clayton PD. Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing. Ann Intern Med. 1995. 122:681–688.

18. Park MY, Yoon D, Choi NK, Lee J, Lee K, Lim HS, Park BJ, Kim JH, Park RW. Construction of an open-access QT database for detecting the proarrhythmia potential of marketed drugs: ECG-ViEW. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012. 07. 25. [Epub]. DOI:10.1038/clpt.2012.93.

19. Murphy SN, Mendis ME, Berkowitz DA, Kohane I, Chueh HC. Integration of clinical and genetic data in the i2b2 architecture. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006. 1040.

20. Platt R, Carnahan RM, Brown JS, Chrischilles E, Curtis LH, Hennessy S, Nelson JC, Racoosin JA, Robb M, Schneeweiss S, Toh S, Weiner MG. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration.s Mini-Sentinel program: status and direction. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012. 21:Suppl 1. 1–8.

21. Trifiro G, Fourrier-Reglat A, Sturkenboom MC, Diaz Acedo C, Van Der Lei J. EU-ADR Group. The EU-ADR project: preliminary results and perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009. 148:43–49.

22. Cios KJ, Moore GW. Uniqueness of medical data mining. Artif Intell Med. 2002. 26:1–24.

23. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Research repositories, databases, and the HIPAA privacy rule [Internet]. 2004. cited 2012 Jun 27. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health;Available from: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/research_repositories.asp.

24. El Emam K, Arbuckle L, Koru G, Eze B, Gaudette L, Neri E, Rose S, Howard J, Gluck J. De-identification methods for open health data: the case of the Heritage Health Prize claims dataset. J Med Internet Res. 2012. 14:e33.

25. Service RF. Gene sequencing. The race for the $1000 genome. Science. 2006. 311:1544–1546.

26. Dondorp WJ, de Wert GM. The 'thousand-dollar genome': an ethical exploration. 2010. The Hague: Centre for Ethics and Health.