J Korean Acad Oral Health.  2024 Mar;48(1):20-25. 10.11149/jkaoh.2024.48.1.20.

Microplastic chip occurrence at toothbrush bristle tips: an optical microscopy investigation

• Jeong SH
• Cho YJ
• Jun EJ

• KMID: 2554097
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.11149/jkaoh.2024.48.1.20

Abstract

Objectives
This study aimed to investigate the presence of microplastic chips at the tips of toothbrush bristles using optical microscopy.
Methods
Toothbrushes available in South Korea were tested. We randomly selected 12 toothbrushes, including four domestically produced and eight imported toothbrushes. Toothbrushes with tapered bristle ends were excluded. Toothbrushes with conventional bristle shapes based on visual inspection were included. Three identical toothbrushes were prepared. The outer bristles of each toothbrush were sampled using Scotch^TM tape and prepared using a scalpel for optical microscopy. The inspector visually assessed both the bristle diameter and the presence of microplastic chips that remained attached to the ends of the toothbrush bristles under light microscopy (40× magnification).
Results
All toothbrush bristles met the criteria for soft bristles (diameters ranging from 0.2 to 0.25 mm). The incidence of microplastic chips varied among toothbrush bristles, ranging from a minimum of 3.6% to a maximum of 86.2%. Notably, toothbrushes with smaller diameter bristles exhibited higher levels of microplastic chips.
Conclusions
This study confirmed that the trimming conditions of toothbrush bristles and the occurrence of microplastic chips vary among different toothbrushes. Our findings suggest that toothbrush manufacturers need to improve their manufacturing processes to prevent the generation of microplastic chips during bristle trimming.

Keyword

Microplastic chip; Optical microscopy; Toothbrush bristle

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 The toothbrush bristle specimens prepared in this study.

• 

  Fig. 2 Toothbrush bristles magnified at 40-fold in each toothbrush (left: bristles with normal finishing, right: bristles with microplastic chips).

Reference

References

1. Environmental Health Comprehensive Information System (EHC). Environmental Health by Topic, exploring Environmental Health, Microplastics [Internet]. Available from : https://www.ehtis.or.kr/cmn/sym/mnu/mpm/60001071/htmlMenuView.do. cited 2024 Feb 16.

2. Lim DK. Current status of microplastics and their impact on the ecosystem. BRIC View 2020-T35;2020:1-17. Available from: https://www.ibric.org/myboard/read.php?Board=report&id=3617.

3. Ryu JH, Cho CY. 2019; Current Status of Microplastics and Impact on Human Health. J Ind Eng Chem. 22:1–12.

4. Caputi S, Diomede F, Lanuti P, Marconi GD, Di Carlo P, Sinjari B, et al. 2022; Microplastics affect the inflammation pathway in human gingival fibroblasts: a study in the Adriatic Sea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19:7782. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137782. PMID: 35805437. PMCID: PMC9266176.

5. Chandran T, Vishnu U, Warrier AK. Muthu SS, editor. 2021. Microplastics in dentistry-a review. Microplastic Pollution. Springer;Singapore: p. 157–174. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-0297-9_6. PMCID: PMC8830578.

6. The joongang. Life, living, Environmental life, 23 billion are thrown away every year... For the first time, plastic toothbrushes do not rot [Internet]. Available from: https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/23987408. cited 2024 Feb 16.

7. Naver shopping. Search [Internet]. Available from: https://search.shopping.naver.com/search/all?query=나무칫솔. cited 2024 Feb 16.

8. Protyusha GB, Kavitha B, Robin RS, Nithin A, Ineyathendral TR, et al. 2024; Microplastics in oral healthcare products (OHPs) and their environmental health risks and mitigation measures. Environmental Pollution. 343:123118. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123118. PMID: 38092338.

9. Alexander JF, Saffir AJ, Gold W. 1977; The measurement of the effect of toothbrushes on soft tissue abrasion. J Dent Res. 56:722–727. DOI: 10.1177/00220345770560070301. PMID: 269150.

10. Breitenmoser J, Morman W, Muhlemann HR. 1979; Damaging effects of toothbrush bristle end form on gingiva. J Periodontol. 50:212–216. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1979.50.4.212. PMID: 374707.

11. Silverstone LM, Featherstone MJ. 1988; Examination of the end rounding pattern of toothbrush bristles using scanning electron microscopy: a comparison of eight toothbrush types. Gerodontics. 4:45–62.

12. Danser MM, Timmerman MF, Ijzerman Y, Bulthuis H, Van Der Velden Van der Weijden GA. 1998; Evaluation of the incidence of gingival abrasion as a result of toothbrushing. J Clin Periodontol. 25:701–706. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02510.x. PMID: 9763324.

13. Park DY. Oral Health Textbook Editorial Committee. 2016. Oral care method. Preventive Dentistry. DaehanNarea Publishing Inc.;Seoul: p. 101–122.

14. Wetzel WE, Schaumburg C, Ansari F, Kroeger T, Sziegoleit A. 2005; Microbial contamination of toothbrushes with different principles of filament anchoring. J Am Dent Assoc. 136:758–765. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0259. PMID: 16022040.

15. International Standard ISO 20126:2022(E). Manual toothbrushes - General requirements and test methods. 2012; International Standard ISO. 2022.

16. Reiter C, Wetzel WE. 1991; The finishing of the bristle ends in interdental brushes. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin. 101:431–437.

17. Jung M, Koçkapan C, Wetzel WE. 2003; Bristle end rounding of manual toothbrushes and reproducibility of end rounding classification. Am J Dent. 16:299–304.

18. Chinese Standard GB 19342-2013(CN), Toothbrushes.

19. Lee HS, Jung HI, Kang SM, Kim HE, Kim BI. 2017; Evaluation of the bristle end-rounding patterns of children's toothbrushes using scanning electron microscopy and stereomicroscopy. Int J Dent Hyg. 15:120–127. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12179. PMID: 26376737.

20. Voelker MA, Bayne SC, Liu Y, Walker MP. 2013; Catalogue of tooth brush head designs. ADHA. 87:118–133.

21. Rehman A, Shah SM, Ali SA, Khokhar NH, Mehmood SJ, Ifrahim AF. 2020; Analysis of bristle design of commercially available tooth brushes by using scanning electron microscope. J Pak Med Assoc. 70:248–251. DOI: 10.5455/JPMA.11418. PMID: 32063615.

22. Checchi L, Minguzzi S, Franchi M, Forteleoni G. 2001; Toothbrush filaments end-rounding: stereomicroscope analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 28:360–364. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028004360.x. PMID: 11314893.

23. Kim DW, Kim JE, Choi CH. 2022; A study on the bristles of commercial toothbrush in Korea. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 46:222–227. DOI: 10.11149/jkaoh.2022.46.4.222.

24. The toothbrush. 1991; The mainstay of oral care. J Am Dent Assoc. 122:2–5.

25. Paik DI, Kim HD, Jin BY, Park YD, Shin SC, Cho JW, et al. 2011. Clinical Preventive Dentistry. 5th ed. Komoonsa;Seoul: p. 81–114.

26. Bakkal M, Shih AJ, McSpadden SB, Liu CT, Scattergood RO. 2005; Light emission, chip morphology, and burr formation in drilling the bulk metallic glass. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 45:741–752. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.11.004.

27. Wu X, Li L, He N. 2017; Investigation on the burr formation mechanism in micro cutting. Precis Eng. 47:191–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.08.004.

28. BASS CC. 1954; An effective method of personal oral hygiene; part II. J La State Med Soc. 106:100–112.

29. Yonhap News Agency. Strengthening toothbrush and floss hygiene management [Internet]. Available from: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20211020105200501. cited 2024 Feb 16.

30. CNC News. It is managed with 'hygiene products' such as tattoo dye, toothbrush, and dental floss [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cncnews.co.kr/mobile/article.html?no=8249. cited 2024 Feb 16.