J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg.  2024 Mar;26(1):23-29. 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2023.05.002.

Transcranial Doppler emboli monitoring for stroke prevention after flow diverting stents

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Texas, USA
  • 3Division of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, New Hampshire, USA
  • 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospital San Fernando, Buenos Aaires, Argentina
  • 5Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal

Abstract


Objective
Flow diverting stents (FDS) are increasingly used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. While FDS can provide flow diversion of parent vessels, their high metal surface coverage can cause thromboembolism. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) emboli monitoring can be used to identify subclinical embolic phenomena after neurovascular procedures. Limited data exists regarding the use of TCDs for emboli monitoring in the periprocedural period after FDS placement. We evaluated the rate of positive TCDs microembolic signals and stroke after FDS deployment at our institution.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 105 patients who underwent FDS treatment between 2012 and 2016 using the Pipeline stent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Patients were pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel. All patients were therapeutic on clopidogrel pre-operatively. TCD emboli monitoring was performed immediately after the procedure. Microembolic signals (mES) were classified as “positive” (<15 mES/hour) and “strongly positive” (>15 mES/hour). Clinical stroke rates were determined at 2-week and 6-month post-operatively.
Results
A total of 132 intracranial aneurysms were treated in 105 patients. TCD emboli monitoring was “positive” in 11.4% (n=12) post-operatively and “strongly positive” in 4.8% (n=5). These positive cases were treated with heparin drips or modification of the antiplatelet regimen, and TCDs were repeated. Following medical management modifications, normalization of mES was achieved in 92% of cases. The overall stroke rates at 2-week and 6-months were 3.8% and 4.8%, respectively.
Conclusions
TCD emboli monitoring may help early in the identification of thromboembolic events after flow diversion stenting. This allows for modification of medical therapy and, potentially, preventionf of escalation into post-operative strokes.

Keyword

Transcranial Doppler; Endovascular stent; Flow diverter; Intracranial aneurysm

Reference

1. Babikian VL, Wijman CA. Brain embolism monitoring with transcranial doppler ultrasound. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2003; Jul. 5(3):221–32.
Article
2. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: Results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013; 267:858–68.
Article
3. Brasiliense LB, Stanley MA, Grewal SS, Cloft HJ, Sauvageau E, Lanzino G, et al. Silent ischemic events after pipeline embolization device: A prospective evaluation with mr diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016; Nov. 8(11):1136–9.
Article
4. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: A meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013; Feb. 44(2):442–7.
Article
5. Delgado Almandoz JE, Crandall BM, Scholz JM, Fease JL, Anderson RE, Kadkhodayan Y, et al. Pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction units value predicts perioperative thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013; Nov. 5 Suppl 3(2):iii3–10.
Article
6. Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Kelly ME, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, et al. Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the pipeline embolization device: The emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018; Jul. 10(Suppl 1):i9–18.
Article
7. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2008; May. 62(5):1115–20. discussion 1120-1.
Article
8. Georgiadis D, Lindner A, Manz M, Sonntag M, Zunker P, Zerkowski HR, et al. Intracranial microembolic signals in 500 patients with potential cardiac or carotid embolic source and in normal controls. Stroke. 1997; Jun. 28(6):1203–7.
Article
9. Goertler M, Blaser T, Krueger S, Hofmann K, Baeumer M, Wallesch CW. Cessation of embolic signals after antithrombotic prevention is related to reduced risk of recurrent arterioembolic transient ischaemic attack and stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; Mar. 72(3):338–42.
Article
10. Gupta R, Moore JM, Griessenauer CJ, Adeeb N, Patel AS, Youn R, et al. Assessment of dual-antiplatelet regimen for pipeline embolization device placement: A survey of major academic neurovascular centers in the United States. World Neurosurg. 2016; Dec. 96:285–92.
Article
11. Heller RS, Dandamudi V, Lanfranchi M, Malek AM. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on thromboembolism after flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurosurg. 2013; Dec. 119(6):1603–10.
Article
12. Kan P, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, Liebman KM, Binning MJ, Dumont TM, et al. Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: A U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery. 2012; Dec. 71(6):1080–7. discussion 1087-8.
13. Klötzsch C, Nahser HC, Henkes H, Kühne D, Berlit P. Detection of microemboli distal to cerebral aneurysms before and after therapeutic embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998; Aug. 19(7):1315–8.
14. Ku JC, Chavda V, Palmisciano P, Pasarikovski CR, Yang VX, Kiwan R, et al. Endovascular treatment for anterior inferior cerebellar artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA-PICA) common trunk variant aneurysms: Technical note and literature review. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023; Apr.
Article
15. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; Jan. 32(1):34–40.
Article
16. Padayachee TS, Parsons S, Theobold R, Linley J, Gosling RG, Deverall PB. The detection of microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass: A transcranial Doppler ultrasound investigation using membrane and bubble oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987; Sep. 44(3):298–302.
Article
17. Puffer RC, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G. Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2012; Apr. 116(4):892–6.
Article
18. Rangel-Castilla L, Munich SA, Jaleel N, Cress MC, Krishna C, Sonig A, et al. Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after pipeline embolization: Longer-term results from 82 aneurysm cases. J Neurosurg. 2017; Apr. 126(4):1064–9.
Article
19. Schubert GA, Thome C, Seiz M, Douville C, Eskridge J. Microembolic signal monitoring after coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: An observational analysis of 123 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; Sep. 32(8):1386–91.
Article
20. Siebler M, Sitzer M, Rose G, Bendfeldt D, Steinmetz H. Silent cerebral embolism caused by neurologically symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. Event rates before and after carotid endarterectomy. Brain. 1993; Oct. 116(Pt 5):1005–15.
Article
21. Spencer MP, Thomas GI, Nicholls SC, Sauvage LR. Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial doppler ultrasonography. Stroke. 1990; Mar. 21(3):415–23.
Article
22. Valton L, Larrue V, le Traon AP, Massabuau P, Geraud G. Microembolic signals and risk of early recurrence in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 1998; Oct. 29(10):2125–8.
Article
23. van Zuilen EV, Moll FL, Vermeulen FE, Mauser HW, van Gijn J, Ackerstaff RG. Detection of cerebral microemboli by means of transcranial doppler monitoring before and after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1995; Feb. 26(2):210–3.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JCEN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr