Korean J Gastroenterol.  2024 Jan;83(1):28-32. 10.4166/kjg.2023.140.

Long-term Survivor of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea

Abstract

differentiated carcinoma of the pancreas (UPC) is a rare, aggressive pancreatic cancer subtype. In addition, there is limited data on optimal management and patients tend to present with unresectable disease. This highlights the need to explore non-surgical treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In 2017, a 40-year-old male was diagnosed with UPC, presenting with a 6 cm mass in the pancreas, encasing the major arteries, indicative of a locally advanced stage. Histopathology confirmed UPC with osteoclast-like giant cells. After nine cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, treatment was stopped in 2018 because of his declining health. Remarkably, despite the cessation of treatment, by 2023, the tumor had shrunk to 3.5 cm with no metabolic activity indicated by FDG-PET/CT. This six-year survival and response to non-surgical treatment highlight potential new avenues for managing unresectable pancreatic cancer, underscoring the need for further comprehensive studies to evaluate these therapeutic strategies.

Keyword

Pancreatic neoplasm; Cancer survivors; Pancreatic cancer; Concurrent chemoradiotherapㅛ

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Endoscopic ultrasound showing a heterogenous lesion with irregular margins in the body of the pancreas. An EUS-guided fine needle biopsy needle is visible within the tumor. (B) Cell block preparation showing atypical spindle and epithelioid cells with few osteoclast-like giant cells with bland nuclei (H&E stain, ×400).

  • Fig. 2 Serial contrast-enhanced computer tomography images. (A) Initial CT (April 11, 2017) showing a 6 cm-sized solid and cystic mass on the pancreas body with celiac truck invasion. (B) Follow-up CT after CCRT (September 17, 2018) showing a decrease in mass (6 -> 4.5 cm). (C) Recent follow-up CT image (April 1, 2023) showing low attenuating pancreas body fibrotic lesion (3.5 cm) with atrophic changes in the distal pancreatic parenchyma.

  • Fig. 3 Serial fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) images. (A) Initial PET (April 17, 2017) demonstrating a lobulating hypermetabolic lesion (SULmax 7.6) in the mid-pancreatic body portion with cyst portion, devoid of distant metastatic activity, suggesting a locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. (B) Follow-up PET (December 22, 2020) showing significantly decreased metabolic and extent (cystic portion decreased) change in the previous focal hypermetabolic lesion. (C) Follow-up PET image (April 8, 2022) showing no significant evidence of a well-defined hypermetabolic lesion suggesting hypermetabolic local recurrence in and around the pancreatic body portion of the previous cancer size area after the last study.


Reference

1. Kardosh A, Lichtensztajn DY, Gubens MA, Kunz PL, Fisher GA, Clarke CA. 2018; Long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer: A California population-based study. Pancreas. 47:958–966. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001133. PMID: 30074526. PMCID: PMC6095724.
2. Sirri E, Castro FA, Kieschke J, et al. 2016; Recent trends in survival of patients with pancreatic cancer in Germany and the United States. Pancreas. 45:908–914. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000588. PMID: 26745860.
3. Bouvier AM, Bossard N, Colonna M, et al. 2017; Trends in net survival from pancreatic cancer in six European Latin countries: results from the SUDCAN population-based study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 26:S63–S69. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000303. PMID: 28005607.
4. Manduch M, Dexter DF, Jalink DW, Vanner SJ, Hurlbut DJ. 2009; Undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells: report of a case with osteochondroid differentiation. Pathol Res Pract. 205:353–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2008.11.006. PMID: 19147301.
5. Reid MD, Muraki T, HooKim K, et al. 2017; Cytologic features and clinical implications of undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells of the pancreas: An analysis of 15 cases. Cancer Cytopathol. 125:563–575. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21859. PMID: 28371566.
6. Muraki T, Reid MD, Basturk O, et al. 2016; Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells of the pancreas: clinicopathologic analysis of 38 cases highlights a more protracted clinical course than currently appreciated. Am J Surg Pathol. 40:1203–1216. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000689. PMID: 27508975. PMCID: PMC4987218.
7. Gao Y, Cai B, Yin L, et al. 2022; Undifferentiated carcinoma of pancreas with osteoclast-like giant cells: One Center's experience of 13 cases and characteristic pre-operative images. Cancer Manag Res. 14:1409–1419. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S349625. PMID: 35431580. PMCID: PMC9012233.
8. Clark CJ, Graham RP, Arun JS, Harmsen WS, Reid-Lombardo KM. 2012; Clinical outcomes for anaplastic pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. J Am Coll Surg. 215:627–634. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.418. PMID: 23084492.
9. Yoshioka M, Uchinami H, Watanabe G, et al. 2012; Effective use of gemcitabine in the treatment of undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas with portal vein tumor thrombus. Intern Med. 51:2145–2150. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7670. PMID: 22892493.
10. Kobayashi S, Nakano H, Ooike N, Oohashi M, Koizumi S, Otsubo T. 2014; Long-term survivor of a resected undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells who underwent a second curative resection: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 8:1499–1504. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2325. PMID: 25202356. PMCID: PMC4156164.
11. Ueberroth BE, Liu AJ, Graham RP, et al. 2021; Osteoclast-like giant cell tumors of the pancreas: clinical characteristics, genetic testing, and treatment modalities. Pancreas. 50:952–956. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001858. PMID: 34369897.
12. Temesgen WM, Wachtel M, Dissanaike S. 2014; Osteoclastic giant cell tumor of the pancreas. Int J Surg Case Rep. 5:175–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.01.002. PMID: 24631915. PMCID: PMC3980420.
13. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Fu B, Yachida S, et al. 2009; DPC4 gene status of the primary carcinoma correlates with patterns of failure in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27:1806–1813. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7188. PMID: 19273710. PMCID: PMC2668706.
14. Crane CH, Varadhachary GR, Yordy JS, et al. 2011; Phase II trial of cetuximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin followed by chemoradiation with cetuximab for locally advanced (T4) pancreatic adenocarcinoma: correlation of Smad4(Dpc4) immunostaining with pattern of disease progression. J Clin Oncol. 29:3037–3043. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.8038. PMID: 21709185. PMCID: PMC3157965.
15. Dong M, Nio Y, Tamura K, et al. 2000; Ki-ras point mutation and p53 expression in human pancreatic cancer: a comparative study among Chinese, Japanese, and Western patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 9:279–284.
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr