J Retin.  2022 Nov;7(2):65-74. 10.21561/jor.2022.7.2.65.

Anti-VEGF Monotherapy versus Combined Anti-VEGF and Endpoint Management Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema (END-DME Study)

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • 4Department of Vision Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
  • 5J Eye Center, Busan, Korea
  • 6Department of Ophthalmology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, Korea
  • 7Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
  • 8Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
  • 9Lee Eye Clinic, Busan, Korea
  • 10Department of Ophthalmology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • 11Department of Ophthalmology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
  • 12Department of Ophthalmology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
  • 13Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan
  • 14Department of Ophthalmology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • 15Chang’s Retina Center, Daegu, Korea
  • 16Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
  • 17Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
  • 18Department of Ophthalmology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Miki, Japan

Abstract

Purpose
To compare the efficacy of a combination of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and endpoint management (EpM) grid laser versus monotherapy with anti-VEGF in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME).
Methods
This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized interventional study (NCT02462304). Anti-VEGF therapy consisted of one initial injection administered pro re nata in both groups. EpM laser was performed within 1 month after the first anti-VEGF injection. The main outcome evaluated was the number of anti-VEGF injections performed in 6 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were also evaluated monthly. The anti-VEGF agent used in Japan and Hong Kong was ranibizumab, while bevacizumab was used in Korea.
Results
This study enrolled a total of 42 subjects, with 19 (45.2%) allocated to the monotherapy arm and 23 (54.8%) allocated to the combination arm (EpM group). Overall, there was no significant difference in the number of injections between patients in the two groups (+0.12, p = 0.81). Mixed regression analysis with all the covariates plus an interaction term for the ranibizumab/bevacizumab and the monotherapy/combination arm showed that the EpM group needed 0.94 less injections (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.73 to -0.15;p = 0.02). The logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA at 24 weeks was significantly improved in the monotherapy arm (p = 0.03), but not in the EpM group (p = 0.09). CFT at 24 weeks was significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.01).
Conclusions
These data suggest that combination therapy with the EpM laser may be effective for reducing the number of anti-VEGF injections required for DME treatment.

Keyword

Diabetic retinopathy; Laser threapy; Macular edema; Ranibizumab; Vascular endothelial growth factor-A
Full Text Links
  • JR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr