J Korean Med Sci.  2024 Feb;39(5):e49. 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e49.

Consensus Statements on the Definition, Classification, and Diagnostic Tests for Tinnitus: A Delphi Study Conducted by the Korean Tinnitus Study Group

• Choo OS
• Kim H
• Lee SJ
• Kim SY
• Lee KY
• Lee HY
• Moon IS
• Seo JH
• Rah YC
• Song JJ
• Nam EC
• Park SN
• Song JJ
• Shim HJ

• KMID: 2551980
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e49

Abstract

Background
Tinnitus is a bothersome condition associated with various symptoms. However, the mechanisms of tinnitus are still uncertain, and a standardized assessment of the diagnostic criteria for tinnitus is required. We aimed to reach a consensus on diagnosing tinnitus with professional experts by conducting a Delphi study with systematic review of the literature.
Methods
Twenty-six experts in managing tinnitus in Korea were recruited, and a two-round modified Delphi study was performed online. The experts evaluated the level of agreement of potential criteria for tinnitus using a scale of 1–9. After the survey, a consensus meeting was held to establish agreement on the results obtained from the Delphi process. Consensus was defined when over 70% of the participants scored 7–9 (agreement) and fewer than 15% scored 1–3 (disagreement). To analyze the responses of the Delphi survey, the content validity ratio and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance were evaluated.
Results
Consensus was reached for 22 of the 38 statements. For the definition of tinnitus, 10 out of 17 statements reached consensus, with three statements achieving complete agreement including; 1) Tinnitus is a conscious perception of an auditory sensation in the absence of a corresponding external stimulus, 2) Tinnitus can affect one’s quality of life, and 3) Tinnitus can be associated with hearing disorders including sensorineural hearing loss, vestibular schwannoma, Meniere’s disease, otosclerosis, and others. For the classification of tinnitus, 11 out of 18 statements reached consensus. The participants highly agreed with statements such as; 1) Vascular origin is expected in pulse-synchronous tinnitus, and 2) Tinnitus can be divided into acute or chronic tinnitus. Among three statements on the diagnostic tests for tinnitus only Statement 3, “There are no reliable biomarkers for sensory or emotional factors of tinnitus.” reached consensus. All participants agreed to perform pure-tone audiometry and tinnitus questionnaires, including the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Questionnaire.
Conclusion
We used a modified Delphi method to establish a consensus-based definition, a classification, and diagnostic tests for tinnitus. The expert panel reached agreement for several statements, with a high level of consensus. This may provide practical information for clinicians in managing tinnitus.

Keyword

Tinnitus; Tinnitus; Systematic Review

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Review of the Delphi study process.

Reference

1. De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Song JJ, Adhia D. Tinnitus and the triple network model: a perspective. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022; 15(3):205–212. PMID: 35835548.

2. Jarach CM, Lugo A, Scala M, van den Brandt PA, Cederroth CR, Odone A, et al. Global prevalence and incidence of tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2022; 79(9):888–900. PMID: 35939312.

3. Henry JA, Dennis KC, Schechter MA. General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005; 48(5):1204–1235. PMID: 16411806.

4. Yamasoba T, Lin FR, Someya S, Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Kondo K. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res. 2013; 303:30–38. PMID: 23422312.

5. Zeman F, Koller M, Langguth B, Landgrebe M. Tinnitus Research Initiative database study group. Which tinnitus-related aspects are relevant for quality of life and depression: results from a large international multicentre sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12(1):7. PMID: 24422941.

6. Langguth B, Kreuzer PM, Kleinjung T, De Ridder D. Tinnitus: causes and clinical management. Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12(9):920–930. PMID: 23948178.

7. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus: understanding abnormal and normal auditory perception. Front Syst Neurosci. 2012; 6:53. PMID: 22798948.

8. Noreña AJ. An integrative model of tinnitus based on a central gain controlling neural sensitivity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 35(5):1089–1109. PMID: 21094182.

9. Shore SE, Wu C. Mechanisms of noise-induced tinnitus: insights from cellular studies. Neuron. 2019; 103(1):8–20. PMID: 31271756.

10. Lee SJ, Park J, Lee SY, Koo JW, Vanneste S, De Ridder D, et al. Triple network activation causes tinnitus in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a model-based volume-entropy analysis. Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1028776. PMID: 36466160.

11. Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH, Rosenfeld RM, Chandrasekhar SS, Cunningham ER Jr, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 151(2):Suppl. S1–40. PMID: 25273878.

12. Cima RF, Mazurek B, Haider H, Kikidis D, Lapira A, Noreña A, et al. A multidisciplinary European guideline for tinnitus: diagnostics, assessment, and treatment. HNO. 2019; 67(Suppl 1):10–42. PMID: 30847513.

13. Ogawa K, Sato H, Takahashi M, Wada T, Naito Y, Kawase T, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic tinnitus in Japan. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020; 47(1):1–6. PMID: 31606294.

14. De Ridder D, Schlee W, Vanneste S, Londero A, Weisz N, Kleinjung T, et al. Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal). Prog Brain Res. 2021; 260:1–25. PMID: 33637213.

15. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001; 38(2):195–200. PMID: 11223060.

16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(4):395–400. PMID: 21194891.

17. Schmidt RC. Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decis Sci. 1997; 28(3):763–774.

18. Baguley D, McFerran D, Hall D. Tinnitus. Lancet. 2013; 382(9904):1600–1607. PMID: 23827090.

19. Elgoyhen AB, Langguth B, De Ridder D, Vanneste S. Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015; 16(10):632–642. PMID: 26373470.

20. Møller AR. Tinnitus: presence and future. Prog Brain Res. 2007; 166:3–16. PMID: 17956767.

21. Noreña AJ, Lacher-Fougère S, Fraysse MJ, Bizaguet E, Grevin P, Thai-Van H, et al. A contribution to the debate on tinnitus definition. Prog Brain Res. 2021; 262:469–485. PMID: 33931192.

22. Vanneste S, Song JJ, De Ridder D. Tinnitus and musical hallucinosis: the same but more. Neuroimage. 2013; 82:373–383. PMID: 23732881.

23. McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res. 2016; 337:70–79. PMID: 27246985.

24. Ausland JH, Engdahl B, Oftedal B, Steingrímsdóttir OA, Nielsen CS, Hopstock LA, et al. Tinnitus and associations with chronic pain: The population-based Tromsø Study (2015–2016). PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0247880. PMID: 33651844.

25. Humphriss R, Hall AJ, Baguley DM. Prevalence and characteristics of spontaneous tinnitus in 11-year-old children. Int J Audiol. 2016; 55(3):142–148. PMID: 26804253.

26. Cima RF, Kikidis D, Mazurek B, Haider H, Cederroth CR, Norena A, et al. Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(1):e029346.

27. De Ridder D, Elgoyhen AB, Romo R, Langguth B. Phantom percepts: tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(20):8075–8080. PMID: 21502503.

28. Hibbert A, Vesala M, Kerr M, Fackrell K, Harrison S, Smith H, et al. Defining symptom concepts in chronic subjective tinnitus: web-based discussion forum study. Interact J Med Res. 2020; 9(1):e14446. PMID: 31909716.

29. Adams B, Sereda M, Casey A, Byrom P, Stockdale D, Hoare DJ. A Delphi survey to determine a definition and description of hyperacusis by clinician consensus. Int J Audiol. 2021; 60(8):607–613. PMID: 33305628.

30. Genitsaridi E, Hoare DJ, Kypraios T, Hall DA. A review and a framework of variables for defining and characterizing tinnitus subphenotypes. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(12):938. PMID: 33291859.

31. Liu Y, Niu H, Zhu J, Zhao P, Yin H, Ding H, et al. Morphological neuroimaging biomarkers for tinnitus: evidence obtained by applying machine learning. Neural Plast. 2019; 2019:1712342. PMID: 31915431.

32. Vanneste S, Song JJ, De Ridder D. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia detected by machine learning. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):1103. PMID: 29549239.

33. Eggermont JJ. Central tinnitus. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003; 30(Suppl):S7–12. PMID: 12543153.

34. Guitton MJ, Caston J, Ruel J, Johnson RM, Pujol R, Puel JL. Salicylate induces tinnitus through activation of cochlear NMDA receptors. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(9):3944–3952. PMID: 12736364.

35. Haider HF, Bojić T, Ribeiro SF, Paço J, Hall DA, Szczepek AJ. Pathophysiology of subjective tinnitus: triggers and maintenance. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:866. PMID: 30538616.

36. Michiels S, Ganz Sanchez T, Oron Y, Gilles A, Haider HF, Erlandsson S, et al. Diagnostic criteria for somatosensory tinnitus: a Delphi process and face-to-face meeting to establish consensus. Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518796403. PMID: 30213235.

37. Vanneste S, van de Heyning P, De Ridder D. The neural network of phantom sound changes over time: a comparison between recent-onset and chronic tinnitus patients. Eur J Neurosci. 2011; 34(5):718–731. PMID: 21848924.

38. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019; 160(1):19–27. PMID: 30586067.

39. Baguley DM, Bartnik G, Kleinjung T, Savastano M, Hough EA. Troublesome tinnitus in childhood and adolescence: data from expert centres. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 77(2):248–251. PMID: 23245492.

40. Henry JA, Roberts LE, Caspary DM, Theodoroff SM, Salvi RJ. Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014; 25(1):5–22. PMID: 24622858.

41. Rabau S, Cox T, Punte AK, Waelkens B, Gilles A, Wouters K, et al. Changes over time of psychoacoustic outcome measurements are not a substitute for subjective outcome measurements in acute tinnitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 272(3):573–581. PMID: 24395086.

42. Hall DA, Láinez MJ, Newman CW, Sanchez TG, Egler M, Tennigkeit F, et al. Treatment options for subjective tinnitus: self reports from a sample of general practitioners and ENT physicians within Europe and the USA. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11(1):302. PMID: 22053947.

43. Von Der Gracht HA. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2012; 79(8):1525–1536.