Lab Med Qual Assur.  2023 Dec;45(4):166-172. 10.15263/jlmqa.2023.45.4.166.

Variability in the Cycle Threshold Values of SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test: A Review of the Nationwide Proficiency Testing Survey in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
A nationwide proficiency test result for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was analyzed to investigate the intraand interlaboratory variations in the cycle threshold (Ct) values.
Methods
Four different types of contrived samples, including five positive samples with three different concentrations and two negative samples, were sent to participating laboratories in March/October 2022. This study examined the variations in the extraction kits and PCR reagents used in the laboratories.
Results
Overall, 278 and 301 laboratories responded to each challenge. In the first challenge, five laboratories (1.8%) provided incorrect results— three false positives and two false negatives from one positive and one weak-positive sample. In the second challenge, only two laboratories (0.7%) provided incorrect results—one false positive and one false negative from one positive sample. The intralaboratory variations of the Ct values in the first and second challenges were deemed unacceptable (Ct >1.66) in 7 (2.5%) and 14 (4.7%) laboratories, respectively; one laboratory showed unacceptable intralaboratory variations for both positive and weak-positive samples in the second challenge. The interlaboratory variability of the Ct values for two commonly used rRT-PCR reagents was remarkable, with a difference of up to eight cycles observed for the same specimen.
Conclusions
The overall performance and intralaboratory variability of the test were acceptable in most participating laboratories. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting the results from other institutions due to the remarkable interlaboratory variability of the Ct values.

Keyword

Cycle threshold; PCR reagents; Extraction kits; Interlaboratory variation; Laboratory proficiency testing; SARS-CoV-2
Full Text Links
  • LMQA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr