J Yeungnam Med Sci.  2023 Oct;40(4):373-380. 10.12701/jyms.2022.00955.

Association between dental amalgam restoration and urine mercury concentrations among young women: a cross-sectional study

• Park SB
• Kim EK
• Sakong J
• Park EY

• KMID: 2547360
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2022.00955

Abstract

Background
The association between dental amalgam fillings and urine mercury concentrations was investigated in this study to assess the health risks associated with dental amalgams.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included 99 women in their 20s who visited the dental clinic in Daegu, Korea. The 99 participants were composed of 68 subjects who had dental amalgam fillings (exposure group) and 31 subjects who did not have dental amalgam fillings (nonexposure group). Oral examinations were conducted by a single dental hygienist, sociodemographic features were investigated as confounding variables, and urine mercury concentrations were measured using an automatic mercury analyzer.
Results
The mean±standard deviation of the urine mercury concentrations of the exposure and nonexposure groups were 1.50±1.78 μg/g creatinine and 0.53±0.63 μg/g creatinine, respectively. The exposure group showed significantly higher levels than the nonexposure group (p<0.01). The urine mercury concentration significantly increased with an increase in the number of teeth filled with amalgam, cavity surfaces involved, and number of defective amalgam fillings, and according to the latest exposure time (p<0.001). In the multiple regression analysis of amalgam-related factors and urine mercury concentrations after correction for confounding factors, the urine mercury concentration in the group with six or more amalgam-filled teeth, 11 or more cavity surfaces, and two or more defective amalgams was significantly higher than that in the nonexposure group (p<0.001).
Conclusion
According to this study, exposure to dental amalgams was confirmed to significantly affect urine mercury concentrations.

Keyword

Concentration; Dental amalgam; Mercury; Women

Reference

References

1. Guzzi G, La Porta CA. Molecular mechanisms triggered by mercury. Toxicology. 2008; 244:1–12.

2. Barregard L. Mercury from dental amalgam: looking beyond the average. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62:352–3.

3. Mutter J. Is dental amalgam safe for humans?: the opinion of the scientific committee of the European Commission. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2011; 6:2.

4. Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. Dental amalgam: the materials. Adv Dent Res. 1992; 6:94–9.

5. Clarkson TW, Magos L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006; 36:609–62.

6. Olstad ML, Holland RI, Pettersen AH. Effect of placement of amalgam restorations on urinary mercury concentration. J Dent Res. 1990; 69:1607–9.

7. Gottwald B, Traenckner I, Kupfer J, Ganss C, Eis D, Schill WB, et al. “Amalgam disease”: poisoning, allergy, or psychic disorder? Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2001; 204:223–9.

8. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry. Operative dentistry: tooth conservation & restoration. 4th ed. Seoul: Dental Wisdom;2015.

9. Nicolae A, Ames H, Quiñonez C. Dental amalgam and urinary mercury concentrations: a descriptive study. BMC Oral Health. 2013; 13:44.

10. Al-Saleh I, Al-Sedairi AA. Mercury (Hg) burden in children: the impact of dental amalgam. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409:3003–15.

11. Woods JS, Martin MD, Leroux BG, DeRouen TA, Leitão JG, Bernardo MF, et al. The contribution of dental amalgam to urinary mercury excretion in children. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115:1527–31.

12. Kim DE, Song KB. Mercury accumulation in human tissues from restored dental amalgam. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 1998; 22:69–80.

13. Baek HJ, Sakong J, An SY, Lee HK, Song KB, Choi YH. Association between amalgam removal and urinary mercury concentration: a pilot study. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg. 2012; 12:431–8.

14. Jung YS, Sakong J, An SY, Lee YE, Song KB, Choi YH. The relationship between dental amalgam fillings and urinary mercury concentration among elementary school children in a metropolitan area. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2012; 12:253–8.

15. Richardson GM, Wilson R, Allard D, Purtill C, Douma S, Gravière J. Mercury exposure and risks from dental amalgam in the US population, post-2000. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409:4257–68.

16. Edlich RF, Cross CL, Wack CA, Long WB 3rd, Newkirk AT. The food and drug administration agrees to classify mercury fillings. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2008; 27:303–5.

17. Levy M, Schwartz S, Dijak M, Weber JP, Tardif R, Rouah F. Childhood urine mercury excretion: dental amalgam and fish consumption as exposure factors. Environ Res. 2004; 94:283–90.

18. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, et al. Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 295:1775–83.

19. Dunn JE, Trachtenberg FL, Barregard L, Bellinger D, McKinlay S. Scalp hair and urine mercury content of children in the Northeast United States: the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. Environ Res. 2008; 107:79–88.

20. Geier DA, Carmody T, Kern JK, King PG, Geier MR. A significant relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinary porphyrins: a further assessment of the Casa Pia children's dental amalgam trial. Biometals. 2011; 24:215–24.

21. Jin HJ, Sakong J, Choi YH, An SY, Lee YE, Song KB. Relationship between dental amalgam fillings and urinary mercury concentration among children. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2011; 35:258–65.

22. Tsuchiya H, Mitani K, Kodama K, Nakata T. Placental transfer of heavy metals in normal pregnant Japanese women. Arch Environ Health. 1984; 39:11–7.

23. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). 2012 Korean National Oral Health Survey. Sejong, KR: MOHW;2013.

24. Park JD, Zheng W. Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury. J Prev Med Public Health. 2012; 45:344–52.

25. Lim S, Choi MC, Joh KO, Paek D. The health effects of mercury on the cardiac autonomic activity according to the heart rate variability. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2008; 20:302–13.

26. Hair H, Nichols KM. Analysis of mercury in commercial tuna and human hair using the DMA 80 analyzer [Internet]. Presented at: 36th American Chemical Society Northeast Regional Meeting; 2009 Oct 7–9; Hartford, CT. Hartford: ACS Connecticut Valley Section, 2009 [cited 2023 Jan 12]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267322888_Analysis_of_Mercury_in_Commercial_Tuna_and_Human_Hair_Using_the_DMA_80_Analyzer.

27. Song YS, Chung KC. Interrelationships of mercury contents among blood, urine and hair. Chung-Ang J Med. 1983; 8:71–8.

28. Jung KS, Kim NS, Lee BK. Urinary creatinine concentration in the Korean population in KNHANES IV, 2009. J Environ Health Sci. 2012; 38:31–41.

29. Dutton DJ, Fyie K, Faris P, Brunel L, Emery JH. The association between amalgam dental surfaces and urinary mercury levels in a sample of Albertans, a prevalence study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2013; 8:22.

30. Factor-Litvak P, Hasselgren G, Jacobs D, Begg M, Kline J, Geier J, et al. Mercury derived from dental amalgams and neuropsychologic function. Environ Health Perspect. 2003; 111:719–23.

31. Kim JW. A study on occurrence of porosity and leakage of mercury in dental amalgam's inside. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg. 2010; 10:531–40.