Korean Circ J.  2023 Sep;53(9):635-644. 10.4070/kcj.2022.0354.

Modification of HEART Pathway for Patients With Chest Pain: A Korean Perspective

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background and Objectives
The History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART) pathway was developed to identify patients at low risk of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department.
Methods
We modified the HEART pathway by replacing the Korean cut-off of 25 kg/m2 with the conventional threshold of 30 kg/m2 in the definition of obesity among risk factors. The primary outcome was a MACE within 30 days, which included acute myocardial infarction, primary coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and all-cause death.
Results
Of the 1,304 patients prospectively enrolled, MACE occurred in 320 (24.5%). The modified HEART pathway identified 37.3% of patients as low-risk compared with 38.3% using the HEART pathway. Of the 500 patients classified as low-risk with HEART pathway, 8 (1.6%) experienced MACE, and of the 486 low-risk patients with modified HEART pathway, 4 (0.8%) experienced MACE. The modified HEART pathway had a sensitivity of 98.8%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2%, a specificity of 49.0%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38.6%, compared with the original HEART pathway, with a sensitivity of 97.5%, a NPV of 98.4%, a specificity of 50.0%, and a PPV of 38.8%.
Conclusions
When applied to Korean population, modified HEART pathway could identify patients safe for early discharge more accurately by using body mass index cut-off levels suggested for Koreans.

Keyword

Chest pain; Acute coronary syndrome; Emergency department; Coronary artery disease; Body mass index

Figure

  • Figure 1 Flow diagram of HEART and modified HEART pathway for chest pain patient.Patients with known CAD or acute ischemic changes on ECG (new T-wave inversion or ST-segment depression in contiguous leads) were classified as non-low-risk regardless of HEAR score.ACS = acute coronary syndrome; CAD = coronary artery disease; ECG = electrocardiography; HEAR = History, Electrocardiography, Age, and Risk factors; HEART = History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin.

  • Figure 2 The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for HEAR and modified HEAR score.AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI = confidence interval; HEAR = History, Electrocardiography, Age, and Risk factors.


Cited by  1 articles

Adapting the HEART Pathway for Korean Patients: The Potential Impact on Chest Pain Management at Emergency Department
Hack-Lyoung Kim
Korean Circ J. 2023;53(9):645-647.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0165.


Reference

1. McCarthy BD, Beshansky JR, D’Agostino RB, Selker HP. Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22:579–582. PMID: 8442548.
Article
2. Peacock WF, Maisel AS, Mueller C, et al. Finding acute coronary syndrome with serial troponin testing for rapid assessment of cardiac ischemic symptoms (FAST-TRAC): a study protocol. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022; 9:140–145. PMID: 35843615.
Article
3. Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168:2153–2158. PMID: 23465250.
Article
4. Mahler SA, Lenoir KM, Wells BJ, et al. Safely identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circulation. 2018; 138:2456–2468. PMID: 30571347.
Article
5. Parto P, Lavie CJ. Obesity and CardiovascularDiseases. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2017; 42:376–394. PMID: 28965561.
Article
6. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004; 363:157–163. PMID: 14726171.
7. Seo MH, Lee WY, Kim SS, et al. 2018 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline for the management of obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2019; 28:40–45. PMID: 31089578.
Article
8. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018; 138:e618–e651. PMID: 30571511.
Article
9. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44:837–845. PMID: 3203132.
Article
10. Cook NR, Ridker PM. Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150:795–802. PMID: 19487714.
Article
11. American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Tomaszewski CA, Nestler D, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2018; 72:e65–106. PMID: 30342745.
12. Than M, Herbert M, Flaws D, et al. What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the emergency department?: a clinical survey. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 166:752–754. PMID: 23084108.
Article
13. Chen Z, Iona A, Parish S, et al. Adiposity and risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in 0·5 million Chinese men and women: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6:e630–e640. PMID: 29773119.
14. Mahler SA, Riley RF, Hiestand BC, et al. The HEART pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015; 8:195–203. PMID: 25737484.
15. Stopyra J, Snavely AC, Hiestand B, et al. Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification. Heart. 2020; 106:977–984. PMID: 32269131.
Article
16. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 144:e368–e454.
Article
17. Oliver JJ, Streitz MJ, Hyams JM, et al. An external validation of the HEART pathway among emergency department patients with chest pain. Intern Emerg Med. 2018; 13:1249–1255. PMID: 29512019.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr