2. Callander NS, Baljevic M, Adekola K, et al. 2022; NCCN Guidelines
Ⓡ Insights: multiple myeloma, version 3.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 20:8–19. DOI:
10.6004/jnccn.2022.0002. PMID:
34991075.
3. Rosiñol L, Oriol A, Teruel AI, et al. 2012; Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretrans-plantation therapy in multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study. Blood. 120:1589–96. DOI:
10.1182/blood-2012-02-408922. PMID:
22791289.
Article
4. Moreau P, Hulin C, Macro M, et al. 2016; VTD is superior to VCD prior to intensive therapy in multiple myeloma: results of the prospective IFM2013-04 trial. Blood. 127:2569–74. DOI:
10.1182/blood-2016-01-693580. PMID:
27002117.
6. Rosiñol L, Oriol A, Rios R, et al. 2019; Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy prior to autologous transplant in multiple myeloma. Blood. 134:1337–45. DOI:
10.1182/blood.2019000241. PMID:
31484647. PMCID:
PMC6888142.
Article
8. Moreau P, Attal M, Hulin C, et al. 2019; Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 394:29–38. DOI:
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31240-1. PMID:
31171419.
9. Moreau P, Hulin C, Perrot A, et al. 2021; Maintenance with daratumumab or observation following treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and autologous stem-cell transplant in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 22:1378–90. DOI:
10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00428-9. PMID:
34529931.
Article
10. Voorhees PM, Kaufman JL, Laubach J, et al. 2020; Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial. Blood. 136:936–45. DOI:
10.1182/blood.2020005288. PMID:
32325490. PMCID:
PMC7441167.
Article
11. Moreau P, Hebraud B, Facon T, et al. 2021; Front-line daratumumab-VTd versus standard-of-care in ASCT-eligible multiple myeloma: matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Immunotherapy. 13:143–54. DOI:
10.2217/imt-2020-0266. PMID:
33228440.
Article
12. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. 2016; International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 17:e328–46. DOI:
10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30206-6.
13. Blanes M, Lahuerta JJ, González JD, et al. 2013; Intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a matched comparison to a melphalan-only approach. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 19:69–74. DOI:
10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.009. PMID:
22897964.
Article
14. Moreau P, Facon T, Attal M, et al. 2002; Comparison of 200 mg/m(2) melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m(2) melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trial. Blood. 99:731–5. DOI:
10.1182/blood.V99.3.731. PMID:
11806971.
Article
15. Blum A, Haussmann K, Streitz M, et al. 2019; Standardized assay for assessment of minimal residual disease in blood, bone marrow and apheresis from patients with plasma cell myeloma. Sci Rep. 9:2922. DOI:
10.1038/s41598-019-39631-2. PMID:
30814612. PMCID:
PMC6393516.
Article
16. Stetler-Stevenson M, Paiva B, Stoolman L, et al. 2016; Consensus guidelines for myeloma minimal residual disease sample staining and data acquisition. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 90:26–30. DOI:
10.1002/cyto.b.21249. PMID:
25907102. PMCID:
PMC7511978.
Article
17. Arroz M, Came N, Lin P, et al. 2016; Consensus guidelines on plasma cell myeloma minimal residual disease analysis and reporting. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 90:31–9. DOI:
10.1002/cyto.b.21228. PMID:
25619868.
Article
18. Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Chanan-Khan A, et al. 2010; Renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement on behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 28:4976–84. DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2010.30.8791. PMID:
20956629.
Article
19. Wanchoo R, Abudayyeh A, Doshi M, et al. 2017; Renal toxicities of novel agents used for treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 12:176–89. DOI:
10.2215/CJN.06100616. PMID:
27654928. PMCID:
PMC5220662.
Article