Clin Should Elbow.  2023 Jun;26(2):117-125. 10.5397/cise.2022.01326.

Mixed reality visualization in shoulder arthroplasty: is it better than traditional preoperative planning software?

Affiliations
  • 1The Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada
  • 2Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
  • 3Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada
  • 4Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Center, London, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background
Preoperative traditional software planning (TSP) is a method used to assist surgeons with implant selection and glenoid guide-pin insertion in shoulder arthroplasty. Mixed-Reality (MR) is a new technology that uses digital holograms of the preoperative plan and guide-pin trajectory projected into the operative field. The purpose of this study was to compare TSP to MR in a simulated surgical environment involving insertion of guide-pins into models of severely deformed glenoids. Methods: Eight surgeons inserted guide-pins into eight randomized three-dimensional-printed severely eroded glenoid models in a simulated surgical environment using either TSP or MR. In total, 128 glenoid models were used and statistically compared. The outcomes compared between techniques included procedural time, difference in guide-pin start point, difference in version and inclination, and surgeon confidence via a confidence rating scale. Results: When comparing traditional preoperative software planning to MR visualization as techniques to assist surgeons in glenoid guide pin insertion, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of mean procedure time (P=0.634), glenoid start-point (TSP = 2.2 ± 0.2 mm , MR = 2.1 ± 0.1 mm; P=0.760), guide-pin orientation (P=0.586), or confidence rating score (P=0.850). Conclusions: The results demonstrate that there were no significant differences between traditional preoperative software planning and MR visualization for guide-pin placement into models of eroded glenoids. A perceived benefit of MR is the real-time intraoperative visibility of the surgical plan and the patient’s anatomy; however, this did not translate into decreased procedural time or improved guide-pin position. Level of evidence: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics

Keyword

Shoulder arthroplasty; Augmented reality; Deformed glenoid; Presurgical planning; Reverse arthroplasty; Cuff tear arthropathy; Osteoarthritis
Full Text Links
  • CISE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr