Endocrinol Metab.  2023 Jun;38(3):338-346. 10.3803/EnM.2023.1664.

The Early Changes in Thyroid-Stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay over Anti-Thyroid Drug Treatment Could Predict Prognosis of Graves’ Disease

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
  • 3Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
  • 4Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
To determine whether baseline thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay or its early response upon treatment with an anti-thyroid drug (ATD) can predict prognosis of Graves’ disease (GD) in real-world practice.
Methods
This retrospective study enrolled GD patients who had previous ATD treatment with TSI bioassay checked at baseline and at follow-up from April 2010 to November 2019 in one referral hospital. The study population were divided into two groups: patients who experienced relapse or continued ATD (relapse/persistence), and patients who experienced no relapse after ATD discontinuation (remission). The slope and area under the curve at 1st year (AUC1yr) of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies including TSI bioassay and thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) were calculated as differences between baseline and second values divided by time duration (year).
Results
Among enrolled 156 study subjects, 74 (47.4%) had relapse/persistence. Baseline TSI bioassay values did not show significant differences between the two groups. However, the relapse/persistence group showed less decremental TSI bioassay in response to ATD than the remission group (–84.7 [TSI slope, –198.2 to 8.2] vs. –120.1 [TSI slope, –204.4 to –45.9], P=0.026), whereas the TBII slope was not significantly different between the two groups. The relapse/persistence group showed higher AUC1yr of TSI bioassay and TBII in the 1st year during ATD treatment than the remission group (AUC1yr for TSI bioassay, P=0.0125; AUC1yr for TBII, P=0.001).
Conclusion
Early changes in TSI bioassay can better predict prognosis of GD than TBII. Measurement of TSI bioassay at beginning and follow-up could help predict GD prognosis.

Keyword

Graves disease; Hyperthyroidism; Immunoglobulins, thyroid-stimulating; Thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin; Recurrence; Antithyroid agents

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Study population enrollment criteria. TSI, thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin; ATD, anti-thyroid drug.

  • Fig. 2. The area under the curve (AUC) of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay or thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin. AUC1yr, area under the curve at 1st year.

  • Fig. 3. Examples of calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) value. TSI, thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin; AUC1yr, area under the curve at 1st year.

  • Fig. 4. Odds ratio (OR) for the relapse/persistent of Graves’ disease according to slope of thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) and thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay and area under the curve (AUC) of TBII and TSI bioassay. AUC1yr, area under the curve at 1st year.


Reference

1. Kahaly GJ. Management of Graves thyroidal and extrathyroidal disease: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105:3704–20.
Article
2. Smith TJ, Hegedus L. Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:1552–65.
Article
3. Baek HS, Park JY, Jeong CH, Ha J, Kang MI, Lim DJ. Usefulness of real-time quantitative microvascular ultrasonography for differentiation of Graves’ disease from destructive thyroiditis in thyrotoxic patients. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022; 37:323–32.
Article
4. Kahaly GJ, Diana T, Kanitz M, Frommer L, Olivo PD. Prospective trial of functional thyrotropin receptor antibodies in Graves disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105:e1006–14.
Article
5. Giuliani C, Saji M, Bucci I, Napolitano G. Bioassays for TSH receptor autoantibodies, from FRTL-5 cells to TSH receptor-LH/CG receptor chimeras: the contribution of Leonard D. Kohn. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2016; 7:103.
Article
6. Alvin Mathew A, Papaly R, Maliakal A, Chandra L, Antony MA. Elevated Graves’ disease-specific thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin and thyro tibody as a predictive factor for Graves’ disease relapse. Cureus. 2022; 14:e22190.
7. Liu X, Wong CK, Chan WW, Tang EH, Woo YC, Lam CL, et al. Outcomes of Graves’ disease patients following antithyroid drugs, radioactive iodine, or thyroidectomy as the first-line treatment. Ann Surg. 2021; 273:1197–206.
Article
8. Kim MJ, Cho SW, Kim YA, Choi HS, Park YJ, Park DJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of repeated radioactive iodine therapy for Graves’ disease. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022; 37:524–32.
Article
9. Da Silva Santos T, Oliveira JC, Freitas C, Couto de Carvalho A. Thyroid-stimulatory antibody as a predictive factor for Graves’ disease relapse. Cureus. 2022; 14:e22190.
Article
10. Barbesino G, Tomer Y. Clinical review: clinical utility of TSH receptor antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98:2247–55.
11. Bartalena L, Piantanida E, Gallo D, Ippolito S, Tanda ML. Management of Graves’ hyperthyroidism: present and future. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2022; 17:153–66.
Article
12. Brito JP, Payne S, Singh Ospina N, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Maraka S, Sangaralingham LR, et al. Patterns of use, efficacy, and safety of treatment options for patients with Graves’ disease: a nationwide population-based study. Thyroid. 2020; 30:357–64.
Article
13. Azizi F, Amouzegar A, Tohidi M, Hedayati M, Khalili D, Cheraghi L, et al. Increased remission rates after long-term methimazole therapy in patients with Graves’ disease: results of a randomized clinical trial. Thyroid. 2019; 29:1192–200.
Article
14. Park SY, Kim BH, Kim M, Hong AR, Park J, Park H, et al. The longer the antithyroid drug is used, the lower the relapse rate in Graves’ disease: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Korea. Endocrine. 2021; 74:120–7.
Article
15. Azizi F, Abdi H, Mehran L, Amouzegar A. Appropriate duration of antithyroid drug treatment as a predictor for relapse of Graves’ disease: a systematic scoping review. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022; 45:1139–50.
Article
16. Garcia-Mayor RV, Alvarez-Vazquez P, Fluiters E, Valverde D, Andrade A. Long-term remission following antithyroid drug withdrawal in patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism: parameters with prognostic value. Endocrine. 2019; 63:316–22.
Article
17. Baek HS, Lee J, Jeong CH, Lee J, Ha J, Jo K, et al. The prediction model using thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin bioassay for relapse of Graves’ disease. J Endocr Soc. 2022; 6:bvac023.
Article
18. Kwon H, Kim WG, Jang EK, Kim M, Park S, Jeon MJ, et al. Usefulness of measuring thyroid stimulating antibody at the time of antithyroid drug withdrawal for predicting relapse of Graves disease. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2016; 31:300–10.
Article
19. Li Y, Kim J, Diana T, Klasen R, Olivo PD, Kahaly GJ. A novel bioassay for anti-thyrotrophin receptor autoantibodies detects both thyroid-blocking and stimulating activity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013; 173:390–7.
Article
20. Watson PF, Ajjan RA, Phipps J, Metcalfe R, Weetman AP. A new chemiluminescent assay for the rapid detection of thyroid stimulating antibodies in Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998; 49:577–81.
Article
21. Okamura K, Bandai S, Fujikawa M, Sato K, Ikenoue H, Kitazono T. Long-term antithyroid drug treatment: trends in serum TSH and TSH receptor antibody changes in patients with Graves’ disease. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 18(Suppl):e101139.
Article
22. Takasu N, Yamashiro K, Komiya I, Ochi Y, Sato Y, Nagata A. Remission of Graves’ hyperthyroidism predicted by smooth decreases of thyroid-stimulating antibody and thyrotropinbinding inhibitor immunoglobulin during antithyroid drug treatment. Thyroid. 2000; 10:891–6.
Article
23. Kahaly GJ, Bartalena L, Hegedus L, Leenhardt L, Poppe K, Pearce SH. 2018 European Thyroid Association guideline for the management of Graves’ hyperthyroidism. Eur Thyroid J. 2018; 7:167–86.
Article
24. Kahaly GJ, Diana T, Olivo PD. TSH receptor antibodies: relevance & utility. Endocr Pract. 2020; 26:97–106.
Article
25. Morshed SA, Ma R, Latif R, Davies TF. How one TSH receptor antibody induces thyrocyte proliferation while another induces apoptosis. J Autoimmun. 2013; 47:17–24.
Article
26. Flynn JC, Gilbert JA, Meroueh C, Snower DP, David CS, Kong YC, et al. Chronic exposure in vivo to thyrotropin receptor stimulating monoclonal antibodies sustains high thyroxine levels and thyroid hyperplasia in thyroid autoimmunity-prone HLA-DRB1*0301 transgenic mice. Immunology. 2007; 122:261–7.
Article
27. Frohlich E, Wahl R. Thyroid autoimmunity: role of anti-thyroid antibodies in thyroid and extra-thyroidal diseases. Front Immunol. 2017; 8:521.
28. Bano A, Gan E, Addison C, Narayanan K, Weaver JU, Tsatlidis V, et al. Age may influence the impact of TRAbs on thyroid function and relapse-risk in patients with Graves disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 104:1378–85.
Article
29. Zuhur SS, Yildiz I, Altuntas Y, Bayraktaroglu T, Erol S, Sahin S, et al. The effect of gender on response to antithyroid drugs and risk of relapse after discontinuation of the antithyroid drugs in patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism: a multicentre study. Endokrynol Pol. 2020; 71:207–12.
30. Zhou Y, Zhou M, Qi Y, Wang W, Chen X, Wang S. The prognostic value of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin in the management of Graves’ disease. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 12:20420188211044943.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ENM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr