Imaging Sci Dent.  2023 Mar;53(1):35-42. 10.5624/isd.20220152.

Dental radiology reporting status and recording frequency of reporting items in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dankook University College of Dentistry, Cheonan, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
This study investigated the current dental radiology reporting methods and the recording rate of 10 mandatory reporting items in Korea.
Materials and Methods
An original online survey created using Google Forms was distributed to dental practitioners. The survey asked about the participants’ age, experience, workplace, use of radiologic equipment, radiology reporting methods, and recording reporting items.
Results
In total, 354 responses were analyzed. Radiologic reporting in dental charts was the most commonly used method for each modality. Four out of 10 mandatory items were recorded at a high rate, but the remaining 6 items had substantially lower recording rates, often below 50%. The participants who reported radiographic findings through other separate methods had higher item scores than those who wrote findings in dental charts (P<0.05).
Conclusion
Radiologic societies and dental associations should encourage the use of separate reports for radiographic examinations. Education regarding radiology reports and the justification for reporting items should be reinforced in dental schools, training courses on radiology, and the continuing education curriculum.

Keyword

Dental records; Panoramic Radiography; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Full Text Links
  • ISD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr