Anesth Pain Med.  2023 Jan;18(1):37-45. 10.17085/apm.22214.

Depth of double-lumen endobronchial tube: a comparison between real practice and clinical recommendations using height-based formulae

• Woo JH
• Cho S
• Kim YJ
• Kim DY
• Choi Y
• Lee JW

• KMID: 2540332
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22214

Abstract

Background
The depth of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) is reportedly known tobe directly proportional to height and several height-based recommendations have beensuggested. This retrospective study was designed to find out the difference between calculated depths using height-based formulae and realistic depths in clinical practice of DLTplacement by analyzing pooled data from patients intubated with left-sided DLT.Methods: The electronic medical records of adults, intubated with DLT from February 2018to December 2020, were reviewed. Data retrieved included age, sex, height, weight, andsize and depth of DLT. The finally documented DLT depth (depth final, DF) was comparedwith the calculated depths, and the relationship between height and DF was also evaluated.A questionnaire on endobronchial intubation method was sent to anesthesiologists.Results: A total of 503 out of 575 electronic records of consecutive patients were analyzed.Although the relationship between height and DF was shown to have significant correlation(Spearman’s rho = 0.63, P < 0.001), DF was shown to be significantly greater than calculated depths (P < 0.001). Despite 57.1% of anesthesiologists have knowledge of clinical recommendations to anticipate size and depth of DLT, no one routinely utilizes those recommendations.Conclusions: Anesthesiologists tend to place DLTs in a deeper position than expected whendepths are calculated using height-based recommendations. Although such discrepanciesmay not be clinically meaningful, efforts are needed to standardize the methods of endobronchial intubation to prevent potential complications associated with malposition.

Keyword

Depth; Double-lumen endobronchial tube; Endobronchial intubation; Height

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Flow diagram of patient enrollment.

• 

  Fig. 2. The relationship between patient’s height and depth final for overall patients.

• 

  Fig. 3. The relationship between patient’s height and depth final (DF) in (A) female and (B) male patients.

Reference

1. Hung MH, Chen JS, Cheng YJ. Precise anesthesia in thoracoscopic operations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019; 32:39–43.

2. Brodsky JB, Benumof JL, Ehrenwerth J, Ozaki GT. Depth of placement of left double-lumen endobronchial tubes. Anesth Analg. 1991; 73:570–2.

3. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Left double-lumen tubes: clinical experience with 1,170 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003; 17:289–98.

4. Eldawlatly A, Alqatari A, Kanchi N, Marzouk A. Insertion depth of left-sided double-lumen endobroncheal tube: a new predictive formula. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019; 13:227–30.

5. Lin WL, Cherng CH. Predicting optimal insertion depth of a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016; 30:942–6.

6. Bahk JH, Oh YS. Prediction of double-lumen tracheal tube depth. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999; 13:370–1.

7. Chow MY, Goh MH, Ti LK. Predicting the depth of insertion of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002; 16:456–8.

8. Takita K, Morimoto Y, Kemmotsu O. The height-based formula for prediction of left-sided double-lumen tracheal tube depth. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003; 17:412–3.

9. Yasumoto M, Higa K, Nitahara K, Shono S, Hamada T. Optimal depth of insertion of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes cannot be predicted from body height in below average-sized adult patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006; 23:42–4.

10. Slinger P. A view of and through double-lumen tubes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003; 17:287–8.

11. Size Korea. Size Korea database. Korea Apparel Testing & Research Institute [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 28]. Available from https://sizekorea.kr/human-meas-search/human-data-search/meas-item.

12. Black AM, Harrison GA. Difficulties with positioning Robertshaw double lumen tubes. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1975; 3:299–311.

13. Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE. Understanding anesthesia equipment: construction, care and complications. 3rd ed. Williams & Wilkins. 1994, p 439-545.

14. Sivalingam P, Tio R. Tension pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, and subcutaneous emphysema in a 15-year-old Chinese girl after a double-lumen tube intubation and one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999; 13:312–5.

15. Saito S, Dohi S, Naito H. Alteration of double-lumen endobronchial tube position by flexion and extension of the neck. Anesthesiology. 1985; 62:696–7.

16. Desiderio DP, Burt M, Kolker AC, Fischer ME, Reinsel R, Wilson RS. The effects of endobronchial cuff inflation on double-lumen endobronchial tube movement after lateral decubitus positioning. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997; 11:595–8.

17. Shin CM, Shin YC, Cheong SH, Choi YK, Kim YJ, Park JW, et al. Study of lengths from the upper incisor to left and right mainstem bronchial carina in Korean adults using a fibroptic bronchoscope. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2001; 40:572–6.

18. Mi W, Zhang C, Wang H, Cao J, Li C, Yang L, et al. Measurement and analysis of the tracheobronchial tree in Chinese population using computed tomography. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0123177.

19. Park JW, Rah EG, Lee BR, Baek CW, Jung YH, Oh SW, et al. Margin of safety in positioning double-lumen endotracheal tubes using a fiberoptic bronchoscope in Korean adult. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2003; 44:151–7.

20. Lee W, Lee JY, Choi DN, Shin CM, Cho K, Kim MH, et al. Airway dimensions and margin of safety with the left-sided double-lumen tube in patients of a short stature. Anesth Pain Med. 2015; 10:110–7.

21. Burton RF, Burton FL. When is sitting height a better measure of adult body size than total height, and why? The contrasting examples of body mass, waist circumference, and lung volume. Am J Hum Biol. 2021; 33:e23433.

22. Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. Worldwide variation in human growth. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1990, p 176-90.

23. Partridge L, Russell WJ. The margin of safety of a left double-lumen tracheobronchial tube depends on the length of the bronchial cuff and tip. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006; 34:618–20.

24. Eldawlatly AA, El Tahan MR, Kanchi NU, Al Qatari A, Ahmad AE. Efficacy of height-based formula to predict insertion depth of left-sided double lumen tube: a prospective observational study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020; 48:354–7.