Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2023 Feb;16(1):67-74. 10.21053/ceo.2022.00976.

Tongue Reduction Surgery Improves Mandibular Prognathism in Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Without Compromising Tongue Function

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Interdisciplinary Program in Stem Cell Biology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
. This study evaluated the surgical outcomes of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome who underwent tongue-reduction surgery and analyzed whether the malocclusion and mandibular prognathism caused by macroglossia could be improved.
Methods
. A retrospective medical record review was performed for 11 patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome whose macroglossia was surgically treated. Demographic data, symptoms and signs, and intraoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes were evaluated. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon using the “keyhole” technique, involving midline elliptical excision and anterior wedge resection. Preoperative and postoperative plain skull lateral X-rays were evaluated to assess prognathism improvement.
Results
. The median age at the time of surgery was 35.09 months, and the ratio of males to females was 4:7. The median surgical time was 98±31.45 minutes, and the median duration of the postoperative intensive care unit stay was 3.81±2.4 days. There were no airway complications. Two patients (18.2%) had postoperative wound dehiscence; however, there was no nerve damage, recurrence, or other complications. Among the five patients who underwent postoperative speech evaluation, all showed normal speech development, except one patient who had brain dysfunction and developmental delay. Measurements of the A point-nasion-B point (ANB) angles and sella-nasion-B point (SNB) angles (point A is the most concave point of the anterior maxilla; point B is the most concave point on the mandibular symphysis) on plain X-rays showed a significant decrease in the postoperative SNB angle (P <0.001) and a significant increase in the ANB angle (P <0.011).
Conclusion
. Tongue-reduction surgery is an effective and safe technique for severe forms of macroglossia associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. In addition, it improves mandibular prognathism in young Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome patients with macroglossia.

Keyword

Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome; Macroglossia; Prognathism

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Tongue-reduction surgical procedure. Clinical images of a representative case. (A) Keyhole technique operative markings on the dorsal surface of the tongue. (B) Keyhole technique operative markings on the inferior surface of the tongue. (C) Intraoperative resection of the tongue. (D) Resected area and direction of sutures (yellow arrows). (E) Immediate postoperative results.

  • Fig. 2. Cephalometric parameters. The sella-nasion-B point angle measures the anterior limit of the mandibular basal arch in relation to the anterior cranial base. The A point-nasion-B point angle measures the anteroposterior relationship of the mandible to the maxilla. The sella-nasion-pogonion angle measures the mandibular prominence. The sella-nasion (SN) and gonion-gnathion (SN/GoGn) angle measures the craniomandibular angle; the GoGn/anterior nasal spine-posterior nasal spine (ANS-PNS) angle measures the intermaxillary angle. Point A is the most concave point of the anterior maxilla; point B is the most concave point on the mandibular symphysis. N, nasion; S, sella; A, point A; B, point B; Pg, pogonion.

  • Fig. 3. Preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) external photographs of two patients who underwent tongue-reduction surgery. Subjective analysis revealed that tongue protrusion significantly improved postoperatively.

  • Fig. 4. Cephalometric analysis. Cephalometric analysis revealed that prognathism improved postoperatively. The sella-nasion-B point (SNB) angle significantly decreased (A), and the A point-nasion-B point (ANB) angle was significantly increased (B). The results of the sella-nasion-A point angle, sella-nasion-pogonion angle, Sella-nasion and gonion-gnathion (GoGn), and GoGn/anterior nasal spine-posterior nasal spine angle were not significant, so they were not included in the figure. (C) The table shows the changes of SNB and ANB angle between before and after the operation. We could find the changes in all 6 Beckwith-Wi-edemann syndrome patients show the improvement of mandibular prognathism. Preop, preoperative; Postop, postoperative; FU, follow-up.


Reference

1. Beckwith JB. Extreme cytomegaly of the adrenal fetal cortex, omphalocele, hyperplasia of the kidneys and pancreas, and Leydig-cell hyperplasia: another syndrome? In : Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Western Society for Pediatric Research; 1963 Nov; Los Angeles, CA.
2. Wiedemann HR. Familial malformation complex with umbilical hernia and macroglossia: a “new syndrome”. J Genet Hum. 1964; Sep. 13:223–32.
3. Higurashi M, Iijima K, Sugimoto Y, Ishikawa N, Hoshina H, Watanabe N, et al. The birth prevalence of malformation syndromes in Tokyo infants: a survey of 14,430 newborn infants. Am J Med Genet. 1980; 6(3):189–94.
Article
4. Elliott M, Maher ER. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet. 1994; Jul. 31(7):560–4.
Article
5. Lodeiro JG, Byers JW 3rd, Chuipek S, Feinstein SJ. Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of the Beckwith-Wiedeman syndrome: a case and review. Am J Perinatol. 1989; Oct. 6(4):446–9.
Article
6. Weksberg R, Squire JA. Molecular biology of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1996; Nov. 27(5):462–9.
Article
7. Limbrock GJ, Fischer-Brandies H, Avalle C. Castillo-Morales’ orofacial therapy: treatment of 67 children with Down syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991; Apr. 33(4):296–303.
Article
8. Ainuz BY, Geisler EL, Hallac RR, Perez JK, Seaward JR, Kane AA. Anterior “W” tongue reduction for macroglossia in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022; Sep. 59(9):1145–54.
Article
9. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1959; Jan. 29(1):8–29.
10. Wolford LM, Cottrell DA. Diagnosis of macroglossia and indications for reduction glossectomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; Aug. 110(2):170–7.
Article
11. Balaji SM. Reduction glossectomy for large tongues. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013; Jul. 3(2):167–72.
Article
12. Rimell FL, Shapiro AM, Shoemaker DL, Kenna MA. Head and neck manifestations of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; Sep. 113(3):262–5.
Article
13. Shipster C, Oliver B, Morgan A. Speech and oral motor skills in children with Beckwith Wiedemann Syndrome: pre-and post-tongue reduction surgery. Adv Speech Lang Pathol. 2006; Jan. 8(1):45–55.
Article
14. Alonso-Rodriguez E, Gomez E, Martin M, Munoz JM, HernandezGodoy J, Burgueno M. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: open bite evolution after tongue reduction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018; Mar. 23(2):e225–9.
Article
15. Kole H. Results, experience, and problems in the operative treatment of anomalies with reverse overbite (mandibular protrusion). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965; Apr. 19(4):427–50.
Article
16. Meazzini MC, Besana M, Tortora C, Cohen N, Rezzonico A, Ferrari M, et al. Long-term longitudinal evalutation of mandibular growth in patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome treated and not treated with glossectomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; Dec. 48(12):1126–31.
Article
17. Massengill R, Pickrell K. Surgical correction of macroglossia. Pediatrics. 1978; Mar. 61(3):485–8.
Article
18. Kaufman Y, Cole P, McKnight A, Hatef DA, Hollier L, Edmonds J. A modified keyhole technique for correction of macroglossia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; Dec. 122(6):1867–9.
Article
19. Gardon MA, Andre CV, Ernenwein D, Teissier N, Bennaceur S. New surgical method of tongue reduction for macroglossia: technical note. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019; Jan. 127(1):e1–7.
Article
20. Egyedi P. Reduction of tongue size in the surgical correction of jaw deformity. Br J Oral Surg. 1965; Jul. 3(1):13–21.
Article
21. Davalbhakta A, Lamberty BG. Technique for uniform reduction of macroglossia. Br J Plast Surg. 2000; Jun. 53(4):294–7.
Article
22. Heggie AA, Vujcich NJ, Portnof JE, Morgan AT. Tongue reduction for macroglossia in Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome: review and application of new technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; Feb. 42(2):185–91.
Article
23. Matsune K, Miyoshi K, Kosaki R, Ohashi H, Maeda T. Taste after reduction of the tongue in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; Feb. 44(1):49–51.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr