2. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on the Science of Science Communication: a Research Agenda. Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, D.C., USA: The National Academy Press;2017. p. xiv. p. 137.
3. Dupont SC, Galea S. Science, competing values, and trade-offs in public health — the example of COVID-19 and masking. N Engl J Med. 2022; 387(10):865–867. PMID:
36053231.
Article
4. Lasswell HD. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York, NY, USA: Whittlesey House;1936.
5. Lantz PM. The medicalization of population health: who will stay upstream? Milbank Q. 2019; 97(1):36–39. PMID:
30549108.
Article
6. Jasanoff S, Hilgartner S, Hurlbut JB, Özgöde O, Rayzberg M. Comparative COVID Response: Crisis, Knowledge, Politics. Ithaca: CompCoRe Network, Cornell University;2021.
7. Petersen MB. Providing Behavioral Advice During a Pandemic. APS Observer. 2022; 35(2):28–29.
10. Jung U, Jang Y, Kim SJ. The omicron great wave should be the time for politics and mourning. Hankyoreh 21. 2022; 1402:17–20.
11. Bear L, Simpson N, Angland M, Bhogal JK, Bowers R, Cannell F, et al. ‘A good death’ during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a report on key findings and recommendations. . London, UK: LSE;2020.
12. Byun J. A doctor’s question of a sustainable response to COVID-19. SISAIN. 2020; 681/682:34–40.