J Korean Acad Oral Health.  2022 Dec;46(4):179-183. 10.11149/jkaoh.2022.46.4.179.

Satisfaction analysis of online non-face-to-face classes of dental hygiene students in the COVID-19

• Kim HJ

• KMID: 2537812
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.11149/jkaoh.2022.46.4.179

Abstract

Objectives
As COVID-19 continued to spread in the local community due to influx, each university had to conduct online classes completely or partially. The purpose of this study was to investigate the satisfaction of learners with the lecture content in online classes, due to the change of the class environment during the pandemic. A survey for assessing satisfaction from online class in major subjects was conducted.
Methods
Online questionnaires were conducted from September 1 to November 30, 2022, targeting 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year students in the Department of Dental Hygiene at college.
Results
As a result of the study: 1. PPT+face, voice recording class-class method with class content was found to be a high 4.06±0.841 points and learning satisfaction was found to be an average of 3.98±0.83 (P<0.015); the other satisfaction: 2. PPT+voice recording class (LMS): 3.96±0.85, 3. Non-face-to-face online class (ZOOM): 3.82±0.89, and 4. LMS system: 3.98±0.88. I think that satisfaction with online classes can be improved with the quality of the content during major online classes in addition to more active interactions taking place between students and professors.
Conclusions
1. Learning satisfaction: 1) ZOOM: 3.82±0.89, 2) LMS (PPT-voice recording): 3.96± 0.85, and 3) LMS (PPT-face+voice recording): 4.06±0.84; 2. LMS Online System Convenience: 4.05 ±0.84

Keyword

COVID-19; Learning satisfaction; Non-face-to-face; Online

Reference

References

1. Jin HY. 2021; A Study on the Perception of University Students about Non-Face-to-Face Classes Operated by COVID-19. Journal of KSSSS. 57:5–28. http://doi.org/10.18346/KSSSS.57.1. DOI: 10.18346/KSSSS.57.1.

2. Kim JM. 2021; A Study on the Perception and the Satisfaction of Online Classes at K University. The journal of humanities and social sciences. 12:1399–1414. DOI: 10.22143/HSS21.12.2.99.

3. Bao W. 2020; COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Hum Behavior & Emerging Technologies. 1–3. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191. DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.191. PMID: 32510042. PMCID: PMC7262082.

4. Lim HY. 2009; KY Heo. YS Kim. Team leaders' interaction patterns in online team project. The Journal of Educational Information and Media. 15:295–317.

5. Choi MJ. 2021; Exploring the change in creative self-efficacy of non-face-to-face creativity classes after the COVID-19 crisis as compared to face-to-face classes. The Korean Journal of Arts Education. 19:57–78.

6. Lee DJ. 2021; & MS Lee. University students' perceptions on the practices of online learning in the COVID-19 situation and future directions. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning. 23:59–377.

7. Kim HK. 2022; Exploration of distance instruction types and operation plans based on teacher and learner needs analysis for universities by stage of COVID-19 spread. The Journal of Local Education Management. 25:305–330.

8. Colpaert J. 2006; Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal. 23:477–497. DOI: 10.1558/cj.v23i3.477-497.

9. Kim NA. A Study on the Satisfaction of Non-Face-to-Face Online Class-Focused on K University. http://dx.doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.11.5.83. DOI: 10.22143/HSS21.11.5.83.

10. Lawrence G, King E, Rajabi . 2014; Cultural differences in online learning: International student perceptions. Educational Technology & Society. 13:177–188.

11. Shebansky WJ. 2018; Blended learning adoption in an ESL context: Obstacles and guidelines. TESL Canada Journal. 35:52–77. DOI: 10.18806/tesl.v35i1.1284.

12. Stanchevici D, Siczek M. 2019; Performance, interaction, and satisfaction of graduate EAP students in a face-to-face and an online class: A comparative analysis. TESL Canada Journal. 36:132–153. DOI: 10.18806/tesl.v36i3.1324.

13. Kim NO. A Study on the Satisfaction of Non-face-to-face Online Class -Focused on K University. HSS21.11. 1145–1157. DOI: 10.22143/HSS21.11.5.83.

14. Clark D. 2002; Psychological myths in e-learning. Medical Teacher. 24:598–604. DOI: 10.1080/0142159021000063916. PMID: 12623452.

15. Kim HK. 2022; Exploration of distance instruction types and operation plans based on teacher and learner needs analysis for universities by stage of COVID-19 spread. The Journal of Local Education Management. 25:305–330.

16. Kim EK, Jeon HJ. 2019; Impact of Study Motivation of Flip Learning on Interest and Satisfaction of Classes Related to Aesthetics. Journal of The Korean Society of Cosmetology. 25:42–50.

17. Kwon OH. 2021; A Study on the Learning Satisfaction and Learning Immersion of Blended Learning (face-to-face) Classes between Korean and foreign college students after COVID-19. J. Kor. Soc. Cosmetol. 27:1053–1061. http://doi.org/10.52660/JKSC.2021.27.4.1053. DOI: 10.52660/JKSC.2021.27.4.1053.

18. Jang WS. 2020; Relationship between practical music majors' major satisfaction, learning immersion, career decision self-efficacy, career preparation behavior, and career maturity: focusing on the comparison between high school and college students. Ph. D. thesis at Seokyeong University Graduate School of General Studies. 109–111.

19. Yang MS. 2021; The effect of online educators' image and teaching ability on learning immersion and learning satisfaction: for beauty students. Hansung University Graduate School of Arts' master's thesis. 2:63.

20. Lee JY. 2013; Analysis of Quality Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction on Mobile Learning Linked to e-Learning in Universities. The Journal of Koreans Society for Educational Technology. 29:209–240. DOI: 10.17232/KSET.29.2.209.

21. Kim KB. 2019; An Analysis of Relationships between Behavioral Intention to Use and Actual Usage of TAM Using LMS Data. Journal of Educational Technology. 35:139–157. DOI: 10.17232/KSET.35.2.139.

22. Jang WS. Relationship between practical music majors' major satisfaction, learning immersion, career decision self-efficacy, career preparation behavior, and career maturity: focusing on the comparison between high school and college students. Ph.D. thesis at Seokyeong University Graduate School of General Studies. 109–111.

23. Lim JH. 2018. A Study on the Open Source Learning Management System to Improve Learning Satisfaction: Focusing on the Vietnam Case. Master's thesis at Korea National University of Broadcasting and Communication. 17.

24. Kim SJ. Effect of advantages and disadvantages of non-face-to-face street dance classes through Zoom on students' behavioral intentions: application of technology acceptance model. http://dx.doi.org/10.21317/ksd.80.1.3. DOI: 10.21317/ksd.80.1.3.

25. Lee JO. A Comparative Case Study on the Factors of Class Evaluation in Face-to-face and Non-face-to-face Classes. http://dx.doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.12.1.11. DOI: 10.22143/HSS21.12.1.11.

26. Kim MY. An Analysis of Differences in Satisfaction Between Face-to-face Classes and Online Classes in Action Learning-based Classes. http://dx.doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.13.5.46. DOI: 10.22143/HSS21.13.5.46.

27. Yang ES. 2021; A Class Model for Non-Face to Face Dance Education in the Corona Era Development and Effectiveness. The Journal of Korean Dance. 39:3. http://doi.org/10.15726/jkd.2021.39.3.004.

28. Jung HK. 2020; College students' satisfaction with the overall implementation of online classes and testing during the Corona 19 pandemic. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning. 23:392–412.

29. Kim KA. 2022; A Study on the Future Dance Education Plan for Post-coronavirus Through the Analysis of Non-face-to-face Dance Classes by Dance Instructors. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 61:247–267. http://doi.org/10.23949/kjpe.2022.1.61.1.18. DOI: 10.23949/kjpe.2022.1.61.1.18.

30. Kim DM. Analysis of Learners' Perceptions Toward Online Learning in Non-credit Extracurricular English Classes. http://dx.doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.12.4.162. DOI: 10.22143/HSS21.12.4.162.

31. Lee SC. 2018; A Comparative Study on Distance Education Systems for Secondary Education in the USA Australia, and Canada. The Journal of Korean Education. 45:81–109.