Kidney Res Clin Pract.  2022 Sep;41(5):556-566. 10.23876/j.krcp.22.006.

External validation of the international prediction tool in Korean patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Kidney Disease Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Republic of Korea
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 5Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 6Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 7Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background
The International IgA Nephropathy Prediction Tool has been recently developed to estimate the progression risk of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of this prediction tool in a large IgAN cohort in Korea. Methods: The study cohort was comprised of 2,064 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN from four medical centers between March 2012 and September 2021. We calculated the predicted risk for each patient. The primary outcome was occurrence of a 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from the time of biopsy or end-stage kidney disease. The model performance was evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and reclassification. We also constructed and tested an additional model with a new coefficient for the Korean race. Results: During a median follow-up period of 3.8 years (interquartile range, 1.8–6.6 years), 363 patients developed the primary outcome. The two prediction models exhibited good discrimination power, with a C-statistic of 0.81. The two models generally underestimated the risk of the primary outcome, with lesser underestimation for the model with race. The model with race showed better performance in reclassification compared to the model without race (net reclassification index, 0.13). The updated model with the Korean coefficient showed good agreement between predicted risk and observed outcome. Conclusion: In Korean IgAN patients, International IgA Nephropathy Prediction Tool had good discrimination power but underestimated the risk of progression. The updated model with the Korean coefficient showed acceptable calibration and warrants external validation.

Keyword

External validation; IgA nephropathy; Prediction model
Full Text Links
  • KRCP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr