Clin Orthop Surg.  2022 Dec;14(4):564-575. 10.4055/cios21127.

Evaluation of Scapula and Humerus Bone Change after Repair of Small- to Medium-Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison between Healing and Retear Groups Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography

• Kim JH
• Min YK
• Kim DY
• Kim JW

• KMID: 2535151
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/cios21127

Abstract

Background
Rotator cuff tendon retears after rotator cuff repair cause glenohumeral joint instability, which results in changes in the glenoid and humerus head. However, limited data are available on the bone change after repair of small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of glenoid and humerus bone changes between healing and retear groups after repair of small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears.
Methods
Among patients who had arthroscopic repair due to small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears from January 2009 to January 2017, 49 patients who underwent both preoperative and postoperative (at least 3 years after surgery) shoulder computed tomography were enrolled. Using three-dimensional reconstruction program (3D Slicer) and shape analysis program (SlicerSALT), we compared the occurrence and degree of glenoid bone change, glenoid inclination change, retroversion change, and glenoid center, as well as the degree of humerus head change, between the healing and retear groups.
Results
The occurrence of glenoid bone change was significantly more common in the retear group than in the healing group (p = 0.026). The degree of bone change in the 11–1 o’clock axial plane and 10–8 o’clock, 11–7 o’clock, and 12–6 o’clock coronal plane and the degree of glenoid inclination change were significantly larger in the retear group than the healing group (p = 0.026, p = 0.026, p = 0.026, p = 0.026, and p = 0.014, respectively), but the average value of glenoid bone change in the retear group was within the range of 0.14 to 1.01 mm for each plane. The mean humeral head change was 5.69 ± 3.67 mm increase in the retear group and 1.27 ± 2.02 mm increase in the healing group. Compared with the healing group, the retear group showed statistically significantly increased humeral head change (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
There was difference in glenoid and humerus bone change between the healing and retear groups at midterm follow-up after repair of small- to medium-sized tears. However, considering the measurement bias, the difference between the two groups was within the measurement error range.

Keyword

Rotator cuff tears; Arthroscopic surgery; Computed tomography; Retear; Bone change