J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.  2022 Jun;38(2):97-109. 10.14368/jdras.2022.38.2.97.

The risk factors for implant survival and marginal bone loss: a retrospective long-term study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Dentistry, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Republic of Korea
  • 3Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • 4Hard-tissue Biointerface Research Center, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Purpose
This study aims to investigate the risk indicators contributing to implant failure, and analyze the relationship between risk indicators and marginal bone loss (MBL) through long-term follow-up over 3 years.
Materials and Methods
From 2003 to 2017, patients’ medical charts with a history of dental implant surgery at Chonnam National University Dental Hospital were reviewed retro-spectively. The patient’s demographic variables, and clinical variables were recorded. Periapical radiographs were used to evaluated the changes in MBL around implants. And we analyzed implant survival rates. Multiple regression analysis with backward elimina-tion was conducted to correlate the patient’s clinical variables and implant failure and Pearson correlation analysis was performed to the correlated between implant long-term survival rates and MBL and initial stability.
Results
In multiple regression analysis, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between abutment connection type ( β = -.189, P < .05), with or without SPT ( β = -.163, P < .05), diabetes ( β = -.164, P < .05), osteoporosis ( β = -.211, P < .05) and MBL. Anticoagulant medication influenced the long-term success rate of implants. PTV values at the second implant surgery showed a statistically significant negative correlation with long-term implant survival (P < .05).
Conclusion
For the long-term success of the implant, the appropriate abutment connection type must be selected and the periodic SPT is recommended. Systemic diseases such as diabetes and osteoporosis and antico-agulant medication should be considered. Furthermore, since high PTV at the second implant surgery correlated with the long-term survival rates of the implant, initial stability should be carefully considered before undergoing the prosthetic procedure.

Keyword

implant stability; implant survival rate; implant success rate; marginal bone loss

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of the final study sample. PTV, periotest value; ISQ, implant stability quotient.

  • Fig. 2 Measurement of marginal bone loss.


Reference

References

1. Brånemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. 1995; Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 6:227–31. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x. PMID: 8603114.
Article
2. Mengel R, Schröder T, Flores-de-Jacoby L. 2001; Osseointegrated implants in patients treated for generalized chronic periodontitis and generalized aggressive periodontitis: 3- and 5-year results of a prospective long-term study. J Periodontol. 72:977–89. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.8.977. PMID: 11525449.
Article
3. Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. 2002; Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 22:109–17. PMID: 12019706.
4. Brägger U, Hirt-Steiner S, Schnell N, Schmidlin K, Salvi GE, Pjetursson B, Matuliene G, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. 2011; Complication and failure rates of fixed dental prostheses in patients treated for periodontal disease. Clin Oral Implants Res. 22:70–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02095.x. PMID: 21158932.
Article
5. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. 2012; Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 23:2–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x. PMID: 23062124.
6. Lang NP, Zitzmann NU. 2012; Clinical research in implant dentistry: evaluation of implant-supported restorations, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 39:133–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01842.x. PMID: 22533953.
Article
7. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. 2012; A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 23 Suppl 6:22–38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x. PMID: 23062125.
8. Chiapasco M. 2004; Early and immediate restoration and loading of implants in completely edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maillofac Implants. 19:76–91. PMID: 15635948.
9. Cochran DL, Nevins M. 2012; Biologic width: a physiologically and politically resilient structure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 32:371–3. PMID: 22577641.
10. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. 2005; Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 20:569–77. PMID: 16161741.
11. Ahmed A, Chambers MS, Goldschmidt MC, Habib A, Lei X, Jacob RF. 2012; Association between microbial flora and tissue abnormality around dental implants penetrating the skin in reconstructed oral cancer patients. Int J Oral Maillofac Implants. 27:684–94. PMID: 22616064.
12. Kasat V, Ladda R. 2012; Smoking and dental implants. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2:38–41. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.109358. PMID: 24478965. PMCID: PMC3894084.
Article
13. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. 1981; A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 10:387–416. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4. PMID: 6809663.
Article
14. Sennerby L, Merdith N. 2008; Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 47:51–66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x. PMID: 18412573.
Article
15. Rosenberg ES, Cho SC, Elian N, Jalbout ZN, Froum S, Evian CI. 2004; A comparison of characteristics of Implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maillofac Implants. 19:873–9. PMID: 15623064.
16. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. 2008; Implant Success, Survival, and Failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 17:5–15. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059. PMID: 18332753.
Article
17. Peñarrocha M, Palomar M, Sanchis JM, Guarinos J, Balaguer J. 2004; Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 19:861–7. PMID: 15623062.
18. de Medeiros RA, Pellizzer EP, Vechiato Filho AJ, Dos Santos DM, da Silva EV, Goiato MC. 2016; Evaluation of marginal bone loss of dental implants with internal or external connections and its association with other variables: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 116:501–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.027. PMID: 27422232.
Article
19. Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Bonfante EA, Santiago Júnior JF, Pellizzer EP. 2018; Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prosthesis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 70:14–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.001. PMID: 29221955.
Article
20. Caricasulo R, Malchiodi L, Ghensi P, Fantozzi G, Cucchi A. 2018; The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 20:653–64. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12620. PMID: 29761902.
Article
21. Knowles JW, Burgett FG, Nissle RR, Shick RA, Morrison EC, Ramfjord SP. 1979; Results of periodontal treatment related to pocket depth and attachment level. Eight years. J Periodontol. 50:225–33. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1979.50.5.225. PMID: 287778.
Article
22. Ramfjord SP, Caffesse RG, Morrison EC, Hill RW, Kerry GJ, Appleberry EA, Nissle RR, Stults DL. 1987; Four modalities of periodontal treatment compared over 5 years. J Periodontal Res. 22:222–3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1987.tb01573.x. PMID: 2955103.
Article
23. Ramfjord SP, Morrison EC, Burgett FG, Nissle RR, Shick RA, Zann GJ, Knowles JW. 1982; Oral hygiene and maintenance of periodontal support. J Periodontol. 53:26–30. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.1.26. PMID: 6948947.
Article
24. Lindhe J, Nyman S. 1984; Long-term maintenance of patients treated for advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 11:504–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1984.tb00902.x. PMID: 6384275.
Article
25. Choi SJ, Jeong HN, Kim OS. 2018; Effect of supportive periodontal therapy on long-term implant survival rate. Oral Biol Res. 42:228–34. DOI: 10.21851/obr.42.04.201812.228.
Article
26. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. 2007; An examination of immediately loaded dental implant stability in the diabetic patient using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Quintessence Int. 38:271–9. PMID: 17432781.
27. Fiorellini JP, Chen PK, Nevins M, Nevins ML. 2000; A retrospective study of dental implants in diabetic patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 20:366–73. PMID: 11203576.
28. Kapur KK, Garrett NR, Hamada MO, Roumanas ED, Freymiller E, Han T, Diener RM, Levin S, Ida R. 1998; A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 79:555–69. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70177-5. PMID: 9597609.
Article
29. Baxter JC, Fattore L. 1993; Osteoporosis and osseointegration of implants. J Prosthodont. 2:120–5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00393.x. PMID: 8242165.
Article
30. Dao TT, Anderson JD, Zarb GA. 1993; Is osteoporosis a risk factor for osseointegration of dental implants? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 8:137–44. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199404000-00014. PMID: 8359868.
31. Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Linde A, Hansson BG. 1996; Factors in implant integration failure after bone grafting: an osteometric and endocrinologic matched analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 25:63–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80015-4. PMID: 8833304.
32. Truhlar RS, Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. 1994; Assessment of implant mobility at second-stage surgery with the Periotest: DICRG Interim Report No. 3. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group. Implant Dent. 3:153–6. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199409000-00002. PMID: 7749399.
33. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. 1999; A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary impalnts. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 28:297–303. DOI: 10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80163-5.
Article
34. Vidyasagar L, Salms G, Apse P, Teibe U. 2004; Dental implant stability at stage I and II surgery as measured using resonance frequency analysis. Stomatologija. 6:67–72.
Full Text Links
  • JDRAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr