Ann Rehabil Med.  2022 Aug;46(4):163-171. 10.5535/arm.22061.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A (NABOTA) for Post-stroke Upper Extremity Spasticity: A Multicenter Phase IV Trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
  • 5Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Presbyterian Medical Center (Jesus Hospital), Jeonju, Korea
  • 6Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea

Abstract


Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Daewoong botulinum toxin type A (NABOTA) after its launch in South Korea.
Methods
This prospective, multicenter, open-label phase IV clinical trial included 222 patients with stroke. All patients visited the clinic at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after injection of upto 360 units of NABOTA into the wrist, elbow, and finger flexor muscles at the first visit. The primary outcome was the change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score for the wrist flexor muscles between baseline and week 4. The secondary outcomes were the changes in MAS, Disability Assessment Scale (DAS), and Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) scores between baseline and each visit, and the Global Assessment Scale (GAS) score at week 12.
Results
There was a statistically significant decrease in the MAS score for the wrist flexors between baseline and week 4 (-0.97±0.66, p<0.001). Compared with baseline, the MAS, DAS and CBS scores improved significantly during the study period. The GAS was rated as very good or good by 86.8% of physicians and by 60.0% of patients (or caregivers). The incidence of adverse events was 14.4%, which is smaller than that in a previous trial.
Conclusion
NABOTA showed considerable efficacy and safety in the management of upper limb spasticity in stroke patients.

Keyword

Stroke; Muscle spasticity; Botulinum toxin type A; Treatment efficacy; Safety; Clinical trial; Phase 4

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart showing the patient enrollment process.

  • Fig. 2 Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores for the wrist, elbow, and finger flexor muscles at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-injection for the full analysis set. Values are shown as mean±standard deviation. ***p<0.001 (post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test adjusted by Bonferroni correction).

  • Fig. 3 Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) score in each domain at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-injection for the full analysis set. Values are shown as the mean±standard deviation. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test adjusted by Bonferroni correction).

  • Fig. 4 Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) score in each domain at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-injection for the full analysis set. Values are shown as the mean±standard deviation. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test adjusted by Bonferroni correction).

  • Fig. 5 Global Assessment Scale (GAS) score rated by the physician or patient/caregiver at 12 weeks post-injection for the full analysis set.


Reference

1. Jung SH. Stroke rehabilitation fact sheet in Korea. Ann Rehabil Med. 2022; 46:1–8.
Article
2. Kuo CL, Hu GC. Post-stroke spasticity: a review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatments. Int J Gerontol. 2018; 12:280–4.
Article
3. Sunnerhagen KS, Olver J, Francisco GE. Assessing and treating functional impairment in poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013; 80(3 Suppl 2):S35–44.
Article
4. CS Kim KY Song KM Min YD An . Method for production of botulinum toxin. World patent WO. 2015/016462 (KR2014/004003). 2015. Feb. 5.
5. Kim CS, Jang WS, Son IP, Nam SH, Kim YI, Park KY, et al. Electrophysiological study for comparing the effect of biological activity between type A botulinum toxins in rat gastrocnemius muscle. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013; 32:914–20.
Article
6. Nam HS, Park YG, Paik NJ, Oh BM, Chun MH, Yang HE, et al. Efficacy and safety of NABOTA in post-stroke upper limb spasticity: a phase 3 multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2015; 357:192–7.
Article
7. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67:206–7.
Article
8. Brashear A, Zafonte R, Corcoran M, Galvez-Jimenez N, Gracies JM, Gordon MF, et al. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:1349–54.
Article
9. Elmstahl S, Malmberg B, Annerstedt L. Caregiver’s burden of patients 3 years after stroke assessed by a novel caregiver burden scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77:177–82.
Article
10. Bhakta BB, Cozens JA, Chamberlain MA, Bamford JM. Impact of botulinum toxin type A on disability and carer burden due to arm spasticity after stroke: a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 69:217–21.
Article
11. Brashear A, Gordon MF, Elovic E, Kassicieh VD, Marciniak C, Do M, et al. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:395–400.
Article
12. Seo HG, Paik NJ, Lee SU, Oh BM, Chun MH, Kwon BS, et al. Neuronox versus BOTOX in the treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0128633.
Article
13. Medy-Tox. MEDITOXIN versus BOTOX in the treatment of post-stroke spasticity of the upper limb spasticity (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01313767) [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: ClinicalTrials.gov;2011. [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01313767?id=NCT01313767&draw=2&rank=1&load=cart .
14. Ney JP, Joseph KR. Neurologic uses of botulinum neurotoxin type A. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2007; 3:785–98.
Article
15. Rousseaux M, Kozlowski O, Froger J. Efficacy of botulinum toxin A in upper limb function of hemiplegic patients. J Neurol. 2002; 249:76–84.
Article
16. Shaw LC, Price CI, van Wijck FM, Shackley P, Steen N, Barnes MP, et al. Botulinum Toxin for the Upper Limb after Stroke (BoTULS) Trial: effect on impairment, activity limitation, and pain. Stroke. 2011; 42:1371–9.
Article
17. Dunne JW, Heye N, Dunne SL. Treatment of chronic limb spasticity with botulinum toxin A. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995; 58:232–5.
Article
18. Bergfeldt U, Borg K, Kullander K, Julin P. Focal spasticity therapy with botulinum toxin: effects on function, activities of daily living and pain in 100 adult patients. J Rehabil Med. 2006; 38:166–71.
Article
19. Cardoso E, Rodrigues B, Lucena R, Oliveira IR, Pedreira G, Melo A. Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of the upper limb spasticity after stroke: a meta-analysis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2005; 63:30–3.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr