J Rhinol.  2022 Jul;29(2):61-68. 10.18787/jr.2021.00379.

The YSK Olfactory Function Test: Development of a New Korean Olfactory Test

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2The Airway Mucus Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 3Korea Mouse Sensory Phenotyping Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 4Taste Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Olfaction is an important aspect of quality of life, beyond simply smelling food and recognizing danger. Recently, research has focused on its association with various diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases or viral infections. The evaluation of olfactory function must take into consideration the cultural experience of the target group. A new Korean culturefriendly olfactory function test, the YSK olfactory function test (YOF test, Kimex Co.), uses safe odorants, such as phenyl-ethyl alcohol (PEA) (not n-butanol), for the threshold test. Furthermore, odorants in the YOF identification test reflect each of eight major chemical functional groups. The diagnostic cut-off for anosmia was a Threshold Discrimination Identification (TDI) score of ≤14.5 and that for hyposmia was 14.5

Keyword

Smell; Culture; Odorants

Figure

  • Fig. 1 YSK olfactory function test kit. A: Exterior photo of the YSK kit. B: A testing pen that contains an odorant. When the lid is opened, the subject can smell the scent. C. The actual evaluation is being carried out under a well-ventilated hood.

  • Fig. 2 Example of scoring for YOF threshold test. The lowest concentration (level 12) goes up by two levels until patient gets the correct answer. If patient gets the right answer twice in a row (red double O), this becomes the first turning point and the concentration goes down one level. If patient gets the correct answer twice in a row (red double O), it goes down one level, and if patient gets the answer wrong even once (red O X or single X), this is the second turning point. In this way, finding the odd-numbered (1, 3, 5, 7, etc.) level of pen, the turning point goes up by two levels until the answer is correct twice in a row. When looking for even-numbered (2, 4, 6, etc.) turning points, go down one level until the answer is wrong. The average score of the last four turning points (in gray box) out of a total of seven turning points becomes the olfactory threshold score. The red double O symbol denotes the turning point going down. The red O X or single X symbol denotes turning point going up. YOF, YSK olfactory function.

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of the score ratio (0 to 1, test score/score scale) between the YOF test and the KVSS-II test for the normosmia group. In the YOF and KVSS-II tests, the TDI, threshold, and discrimination scores showed a relatively similar distribution. The identification score showed a remarkably high trend in the YOF test. ***p<0.001. KVSS, Korean version of Sniffin’ Stick; YOF, YSK olfactory function; TDI, Threshold Discrimination Identification. Adapted from Ha et al. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2020;13(3):274–84 [9].


Reference

1. McNeill E, Ramakrishnan Y, Carrie S. Diagnosis and management of olfactory disorders: survey of UK-based consultants and literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 2007; 121(8):713–20.
2. Croy I, Symmank A, Schellong J, Hummel C, Gerber J, Joraschky P, et al. Olfaction as a marker for depression in humans. J Affect Disord. 2014; 160:80–6.
3. Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T. Olfactory disorders and quality of life--an updated review. Chem Senses. 2014; 39(3):185–94.
4. Schubert CR, Fischer ME, Pinto AA, Klein BEK, Klein R, Tweed TS, et al. Sensory impairments and risk of mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017; 72(5):710–5.
5. Karpa MJ, Gopinath B, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Cumming RG, Sue CM, et al. Prevalence and neurodegenerative or other associations with olfactory impairment in an older community. J Aging Health. 2010; 22(2):154–68.
6. Attems J, Walker L, Jellinger KA. Olfactory bulb involvement in neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Neuropathol. 2014; 127(4):459–75.
7. Xydakis MS, Dehgani-Mobaraki P, Holbrook EH, Geisthoff UW, Bauer C, Hautefort C, et al. Smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(9):1015–6.
8. Agyeman AA, Chin KL, Landersdorfer CB, Liew D, Ofori-Asenso R. Smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020; 95(8):1621–31.
9. Ha JG, Kim J, Nam JS, Park JJ, Cho HJ, Yoon JH, et al. Development of a Korean culture-friendly olfactory function test and optimization of a diagnostic cutoff value. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 13(3):274–84.
10. Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, Altundag A, Cinghi C, Costanzo RM, et al. Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology. 2016; 56(1):1–30.
11. Kim JM, Jeong MS, Shin DH, Seol JH, Hong SC, Cho JH, et al. Olfactory identification test using familiar distracters for Koreans. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 7(1):19–23.
12. An SY, Kong IG, Lee CH, Kim JW. Analysis of the correct-answer rate of the odor identification test in KVSS(Korean version of Sniffin’ Sticks) test. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2007; 50(12):1109–13.
13. Segal D, Bale AS, Phillips LJ, Sasso A, Schlosser PM, Starkey C, et al. Issues in assessing the health risks of n-butanol. J Appl Toxicol. 2020; 40(1):72–86.
14. Bale AS, Lee JS. An overview of butanol-induced developmental neurotoxicity and the potential mechanisms related to these observed effects. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2016; 53:33–40.
15. Kim KW, Ahn K, Yang HJ, Lee S, Park JD, Kim WK, et al. Humidifier disinfectant-associated children’s interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 189(1):48–56.
16. Choi YJ, Jeon MS. How business interests and government inaction led to the humidifier disinfectant disaster in South Korea: implications for better risk governance. Risk Anal. 2020; 40(2):240–53.
17. Doty RL, Brugger WE, Jurs PC, Orndorff MA, Snyder PJ, Lowry LD. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav. 1978; 20(2):175–85.
18. Croy I, Lange K, Krone F, Negoias S, Seo HS, Hummel T. Comparison between odor thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol and butanol. Chem Senses. 2009; 34(6):523–7.
19. Zernecke R, Frank T, Haegler K, Albrecht J, Bruckmann H, Wiesmann M. Correlation analyses of detection thresholds of four different odorants. Rhinology. 2011; 49(3):331–6.
20. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. ‘Sniffin’ sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 1997; 22(1):39–52.
21. Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 1984; 32(3):489–502.
22. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16(3):297–334.
23. Cho E. Making reliability reliable: a systematic approach to reliability coefficients. Organ Res Methods. 2016; 19(4):651–82.
24. Lötsch J, Reichmann H, Hummel T. Different odor tests contribute differently to the evaluation of olfactory loss. Chem Senses. 2008; 33(1):17–21.
25. Mun SJ. Testing for olfactory and gustatory disorders. J Clinical Otolaryngol. 2020; 31(2):148–54.
26. Jacquot L, Hidalgo J, Brand G. Just noticeable difference in olfaction is related to trigeminal component of odorants. Rhinology. 2010; 48(3):281–4.
27. Albrecht J, Schreder T, Kleemann AM, Schöpf V, Kopietz R, Anzinger A, et al. Olfactory detection thresholds and pleasantness of a foodrelated and a non-food odour in hunger and satiety. Rhinology. 2009; 47(2):160–5.
28. Kern DW, Schumm LP, Wroblewski KE, Pinto JM, Hummel T, Mc- Clintock MK. Olfactory thresholds of the U.S. population of home-dwelling older adults: development and validation of a short, reliable measure. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0118589.
29. Doty RL. The smell identification test administration manual. 3rd ed. Haddon Heights (NJ): Sensonics;1995.
30. Jiang RS, Su MC, Liang KL, Shiao JY, Wu SH, Hsin CH. A pilot study of a traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for application in Taiwan. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010; 24(1):45–50.
31. Kamrava SK, Farhadi M, Jalessi M, Khosravian B, Pousti B, Tehran EA, et al. University of Pennsylvania smell identification on Iranian population. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(1):e7926.
32. Barresi M, Ciurleo R, Giacoppo S, Foti Cuzzola V, Celi D, Bramanti P, et al. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Sci. 2012; 323(1–2):16–24.
Full Text Links
  • JR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr