J Adv Prosthodont.  2022 Jun;14(3):162-172. 10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.162.

Effect of abutment neck taper and cement types on the amount of remnant cement in cement-retained implant restorations: an in vitro study

• Park YH
• Kim KA
• Lee Jj
• Kwon Tm
• Seo JM

• KMID: 2531068
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.162

Abstract

PURPOSE
The present study aims to analyze the effect of abutment neck taper and types of cement on the amount of undetected remnant cement of cement-retained implant prostheses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three neck taper angles (53°, 65°, 77°) and three types of cement (RMGI: resin-modified glass ionomer, ZPC: zinc phosphate cement, ZOE: zinc oxide eugenol cement) were used. For each group, the surface percentage was measured using digital image and graphic editing software. The weight of before and after removing remnant cement from the abutment-crown assembly was measured using an electronic scale. Two-way ANOVA and Duncan & Scheffe’s test were used to compare the calculated surface percentage and weight of remnant cement (α = .05).
RESULTS
There were significant differences in remnant cement surface percentage and weight according to neck taper angles (P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in remnant cement surface percentage and weight on types of cement. No interaction was found between neck taper angles and types of luting cement (P > .05). The wide abutment with a small neck taper angle showed the most significant amount of remnant cement. And the types of luting cement did not influence the amount of residual cement.
CONCLUSION
To remove excess cement better, the emergence profile of the crown should be straight to the neck taper of the abutment in cement-retained implant restoration.

Keyword

Dental implants; Cementation; Dental abutments; Dental cements; Peri-implantitis