Korean J Gastroenterol.  2022 May;79(5):199-202. 10.4166/kjg.2022.059.

Complete Endoscopic Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stones

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are the most common cause of acute cholangitis. Removal by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography became the standard of care after endoscopic sphincterotomy was introduced. On the other hand, it is still difficult to remove 10-15% of CBDS completely in the first attempt for various reasons. This review describes the methods for the complete endoscopic clearance of CBDS, including difficult cases, reflecting the latest knowledge and techniques.

Keyword

Common bile duct calculi; Cholangiopancreatography; endoscopic retrograde; Sphincterotomy; endoscopic

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Lithotripsy for a large biliary stone. (A) A large biliary stone is shown on cholangiography. (B) Lithotripsy is being performed. (C) Fragmented stones are extracted.


Reference

1. Vaira D, D'Anna L, Ainley C, et al. 1989; Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet. 2:431–434. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90602-8.
Article
2. Mac Mathuna P, White P, Clarke E, Lennon J, Crowe J. 1994; Endoscopic sphincteroplasty: a novel and safe alternative to papillotomy in the management of bile duct stones. Gut. 35:127–129. DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.1.127. PMID: 8307433. PMCID: PMC1374647.
Article
3. Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, Gunsar F. 2003; Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc. 57:156–159. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.52. PMID: 12556775.
Article
4. McHenry L, Lehman G. 2006; Difficult bile duct stones. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 9:123–132. DOI: 10.1007/s11938-006-0031-6. PMID: 16539873.
Article
5. Lin CK, Lai KH, Chan HH, et al. 2004; Endoscopic balloon dilatation is a safe method in the management of common bile duct stones. Dig Liver Dis. 36:68–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2003.09.014. PMID: 14971818.
Article
6. Park CH, Jung JH, Nam E, et al. 2018; Comparative efficacy of various endoscopic techniques for the treatment of common bile duct stones: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 87:43–57.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.038. PMID: 28756105.
Article
7. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, et al. 2016; Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 48:657–683. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. PMID: 27299638.
Article
8. Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, et al. 2019; Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 51:472–491. DOI: 10.1055/a-0862-0346. PMID: 30943551.
Article
9. Ahn DW, Lee SH, Paik WH, et al. 2018; Effects of saline irrigation of the bile duct to reduce the rate of residual common bile duct stones: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 113:548–555. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2018.21. PMID: 29610513.
Article
10. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, et al. 2010; Biliary stenting in the management of large or multiple common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 71:1200–1203.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.055. PMID: 20400079.
Article
11. Jang DK, Lee SH, Ahn DW, et al. 2020; Factors associated with complete clearance of difficult common bile duct stones after temporary biliary stenting followed by a second ERCP: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Endoscopy. 52:462–468. DOI: 10.1055/a-1117-3393. PMID: 32106322.
Article
12. Podboy A, Gaddam S, Park K, Gupta K, Liu Q, Lo SK. Management of difficult choledocholithiasis. Dig Dis Sci. 2022; Mar. 29. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07424-9. PMID: 35348969.
Article
13. Kuo CM, Chiu YC, Liang CM, et al. 2019; The efficacy of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of large bile duct stones. BMC Gastroenterol. 19:93. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1017-x. PMID: 31215401. PMCID: PMC6582576.
Article
14. Park SJ, Kim JH, Hwang JC, et al. 2013; Factors predictive of adverse events following endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation: results from a multicenter series. Dig Dis Sci. 58:1100–1109. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2494-8. PMID: 23225136.
Article
15. Kim TH, Kim JH, Seo DW, et al. 2016; International consensus guidelines for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation. Gastrointest Endosc. 83:37–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.016. PMID: 26232360.
Article
16. Lee SH, Park JK, Yoon WJ, et al. 2007; How to predict the outcome of endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones? Scand J Gastroenterol. 42:1006–1010. DOI: 10.1080/00365520701204253. PMID: 17613932.
Article
17. Maydeo A, Kwek BE, Bhandari S, Bapat M, Dhir V. 2011; Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy in patients with difficult biliary and pancreatic ductal stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 74:1308–1314. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.047. PMID: 22136776.
Article
18. Patel SN, Rosenkranz L, Hooks B, et al. 2014; Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary calculi using single-operator cholangioscopy: a multicenter experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 79:344–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.054. PMID: 24268531.
Article
19. Krutsri C, Kida M, Yamauchi H, Iwai T, Imaizumi H, Koizumi W. 2019; Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy. World J Gastroenterol. 25:3313–3333. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3313. PMID: 31341358. PMCID: PMC6639547.
Article
20. Tanisaka Y, Ryozawa S, Mizuide M, et al. 2021; Status of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis on biliary interventions. Dig Endosc. 33:1034–1044. DOI: 10.1111/den.13878. PMID: 33073407.
Article
21. Bukhari M, Kowalski T, Nieto J, et al. 2018; An international, multicenter, comparative trial of EUS-guided gastrogastrostomy-assisted ERCP versus enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 88:486–494. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2356. PMID: 29730228.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr