Neurospine.  2022 Mar;19(1):84-95. 10.14245/ns.2143180.590.

Hardware Failure in Spinal Tumor Surgery: A Hallmark of Longer Survival?

• Zaborovskii N
• Schlauch A
• Ptashnikov D
• Mikaylov D
• Masevnin S
• Smekalenkov O
• Shapton J
• Kondrashov D

• KMID: 2528381
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2143180.590

Abstract

Objective
Instrumentation failure in spine tumor surgery is a common reason for revision operation. Increases in patient survival demand a better understanding of the hardware longevity. The study objective was to investigate risk factors for instrumentation failure requiring revision surgery in patients with spinal tumors.
Methods
A retrospective cohort from a single tertiary care specialty hospital from January 2005 to January 2021, for patients with spinal primary or metastatic tumors who underwent surgical intervention with instrumentation. Demographic and treatment data were collected and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival, and separate univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed.
Results
Three hundred fifty-one patients underwent surgical intervention for spinal tumor, of which 23 experienced instrumentation failure requiring revision surgery (6.6%). Multivariate regression analysis identified pelvic fixation (odds ratio [OR], 10.9), spinal metastasis invasiveness index (OR, 1.11), and survival of greater than 5 years (OR, 3.6) as significant risk factors for hardware failure. One- and 5-year survival rates were 57% and 8%, respectively.
Conclusion
Instrumentation failure after spinal tumor surgery is a common reason for revision surgery. Our study suggests that the use of pelvic fixation, invasiveness of the surgery, and survival greater than 5 years are independent risk factors for instrumentation failure.

Keyword

Spine; Tumor; Hardware; Survival; Surgery