Korean Circ J.  2022 Apr;52(4):301-303. 10.4070/kcj.2022.0035.

Use of Shockwave in Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesion: Breakthrough or Myth?

• Lee SY

• KMID: 2528024
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2022.0035

Abstract

no abstract available.

Reference

1. Lee HY, Lim S, Park S. Role of inflammation in arterial calcification. Korean Circ J. 2021; 51:114–125. PMID: 33525066.

2. Galougahi KK, Shlofmitz E, Jeremias A, et al. Therapeutic approach to calcified coronary lesions: disruptive technologies. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021; 23:33. PMID: 33666772.

3. Arunima Kaul A, Dhalla PS, Bapatla A, et al. Current treatment modalities for calcified coronary artery disease: a review article comparing novel intravascular lithotripsy and traditional rotational atherectomy. Cureus. 2020; 12:e10922. PMID: 33194488.

4. Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76:2635–2646. PMID: 33069849.

5. Kereiakes DJ, Di Mario C, Riley RF, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of calcified coronary lesions: patient-level pooled analysis of the disrupt CAD studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14:1337–1348. PMID: 33939604.

6. Aksoy A, Salazar C, Becher MU, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy in calcified coronary lesions: a prospective, observational, multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12:e008154. PMID: 31707803.

7. Umapathy S, Keh YS, Wong N, et al. Real-world experience of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in an asian population: a retrospective, observational, single-center, all-comers registry. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021; 33:E417–E424. PMID: 33893792.

8. Wong JJ, Umapathy S, Keh YS, et al. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy in an Asian population: clinical outcomes in real-world patients. Korean Circ J. 2022; 52:288–300. PMID: 35043608.