Clin Endosc.  2022 Mar;55(2):183-190. 10.5946/ce.2021.254.

Can Computed Tomography Colonography Replace Optical Colonoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Lesions?: State of the Art

• Chini A
• Manigrasso M
• Cantore G
• Maione R
• Milone M
• Maione F
• De Palma GD

• KMID: 2527559
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.254

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Optical colonoscopy (OC) is widely accepted as the reference standard for the screening of colorectal polyps and cancers, and computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a valid alternative to OC. The purpose of this review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of OC and CTC for colorectal lesions. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and 18 articles were included. CTC has emerged in recent years as a potential screening examination with high accuracy for the detection of colorectal lesions. However, the clinical application of CTC as a screening technique is limited because it is highly dependent on the size of the lesions and has poor performance in detecting individual lesions <5 mm or flat lesions, which, although rarely, can have a malignant potential.

Keyword

Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal polyps; Computed tomographic colonography

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Study selection flowchart according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). CT, computed tomography; CTC, computed tomography colonography; OC, optical colonoscopy.

Reference

1. Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014; 383:1490–1502.

2. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017; 66:683–691.

3. Wong MC, Ding H, Wang J, Chan PS, Huang J. Prevalence and risk factors of colorectal cancer in Asia. Intest Res. 2019; 17:317–329.

4. Benson M, Dureja P, Gopal D, Reichelderfer M, Pfau PR. A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105:2578–2585.

5. De Rosa M, Pace U, Rega D, et al. Genetics, diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (review). Oncol Rep. 2015; 34:1087–1096.

6. De Palma GD, Rega M, Masone S, et al. Conventional colonoscopy and magnified chromoendoscopy for the endoscopic histological prediction of diminutive colorectal polyps: a single operator study. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12:2402–2405.

7. de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM, et al. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010; 10:47.

8. Mainenti PP, Salvatore B, D’Antonio D, et al. PET/CT colonography in patients with colorectal polyps: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34:1594–1603.

9. Maggialetti N, Capasso R, Pinto D, et al. Diagnostic value of computed tomography colonography (CTC) after incomplete optical colonoscopy. Int J Surg. 2016; 33(Suppl 1):S36–S44.

10. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:1.

11. Simon K. Colorectal cancer development and advances in screening. Clin Interv Aging. 2016; 11:967–976.

12. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology. 2000; 217:765–771.

13. Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR, Vaizey CJ, Boulos PB. Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46:1384–1390.

14. Singh K, Narula AK, Thukral CL, Singh NR, Singh A, Kaur H. Role of CT colonography in colonic lesions and its correlation with conventional colonoscopic findings. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9:TC14–TC18.

15. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2002; 34:441–446.

16. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology. 2002; 224:383–392.

17. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009; 58:241–248.

18. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology. 2003; 229:775–781.

19. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:1496–1503.

20. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology. 2001; 219:685–692.

21. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349:2191–2200.

22. Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2003; 125:304–310.

23. Ginnerup Pedersen B, Christiansen TEM, Bjerregaard NC, Ljungmann K, Laurberg S. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility. Endoscopy. 2003; 35:736–742.

24. Devir C, Kebapci M, Temel T, Ozakyol A. Comparison of 64-detector CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal lesions. Iran J Radiol. 2016; 13:e19518.

25. Gluecker T, Dorta G, Keller W, Jornod P, Meuli R, Schnyder P. Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gut. 2002; 51:207–211.

26. Hoppe H, Netzer P, Spreng A, Quattropani C, Mattich J, Dinkel HP. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:1924–1935.

27. Chaparro Sánchez M, del Campo Val L, Maté Jiménez J, et al. Computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 30:375–380.

28. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2003; 125:311–319.

29. Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, Sangiovanni A, Del Favero C, Minoli G. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96:394–400.

30. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA. 2004; 291:1713–1719.

31. Mainenti PP, Romano M, Imbriaco M, et al. Added value of CT colonography after a positive conventional colonoscopy: impact on treatment strategy. Abdom Imaging. 2005; 30:42–47.

32. De Palma GD, Giglio MC, Bruzzese D, et al. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87:232–240.

33. Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25:331–345.

34. Offermans T, Vogelaar FJ, Aquarius M, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Simons PCG. Preoperative segmental localization of colorectal carcinoma: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43:2105–2111.

35. Flor N, Ceretti AP, Luigiano C, et al. Performance of CT colonography in diagnosis of synchronous colonic lesions in patients with occlusive colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 214:348–354.

36. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:1403–1412.

37. Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127:41–48.

38. White TJ, Avery GR, Kennan N, Syed AM, Hartley JE, Monson JRT. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11:138–145.

39. IJspeert JEG, Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Kuipers EJ, et al. CT-colonography vs. colonoscopy for detection of high-risk sessile serrated polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111:516–522.

40. Taylor SA, von Wagner C. Is CT colonography better tolerated than flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer screening? Radiology. 2018; 286:884–886.

41. Jung HS, Park DK, Kim MJ, et al. A comparison of patient acceptance and preferences between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Korean J Intern Med. 2009; 24:43–47.