Imaging Sci Dent.  2020 Dec;50(4):281-290. 10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.281.

Positioning errors of dental implants and their associations with adjacent structures and anatomical variations: A CBCT-based study

• Ribas BR
• Leandro Nascimento EH
• Freitas DQ
• Anjos Pontual Ad
• Anjos Pontual MLd
• Cruz Perez DE
• Ramos-Perez FMM

• KMID: 2527033
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.281

Abstract

Purpose
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of dental implants positioning errors and their associations with adjacent structures and anatomical variations by means of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods
CBCT images of 207 patients (584 dental implants) were evaluated by 2 oral radiologists. The distance between the implant and the adjacent teeth/implants was measured and classified as adequate (≥1.5 mm and ≥3 mm, respectively) or inadequate. The presence of thread exposure, cortical perforation, implant dehiscence, implant penetration into adjacent structures, and anatomical variations was also recorded. The incisor canal diameter and the depth of the concavity of the submandibular fossa were measured in order to evaluate their correlations with the frequency of implant penetration in these structures. Descriptive analyses, the Fisher exact test, and Spearman correlation analysis were performed (α= 0.05).
Results
The overall prevalence of positioning errors was 82.9%. The most common error was the inadequate distance between the implant and the adjacent teeth/implants. The presence of anatomical variations did not significantly influence the overall prevalence of errors (P>0.05). There was a positive correlation between the diameter of the incisor canal and the frequency of implant penetration in this structure (r= 0.232, P<0.05).
Conclusion
There was a high prevalence of dental implant positioning errors, and positioning errors were not associated with the presence of anatomical variations. Professionals should be aware of the space available for implant placement during the preoperative planning stage.

Keyword

A natomic Variation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Dental Implant