Lab Med Online.  2021 Oct;11(4):245-253. 10.47429/lmo.2021.11.4.245.

Analysis of the Current Status of Liver Cancer Screening Institutions and Proficiency of Institutions that Conduct Alpha-fetoprotein Tests

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
  • 5National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
  • 6Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
We sought to evaluate the performance of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) qualitative reagents and understand the current status of AFP testing by liver cancer screening institutions.
Methods
Using commercial control materials or pooled serum, several AFP qualitative test kits were assessed four times over a total of two years: Humasis AFP Card (Humasis, Korea), Asan Easy Test AFP (Asan Pharmaceutical, Korea), HiSens AFP card (HBI, Korea), Genedia AFP Rapid II (Green Cross MS, Korea), BioTracer (NanoEntek, Korea), and SD Bioline AFP (Alere, Korea). A survey of 600 institutions was conducted in 2016 and 500 institutions in 2018 to determine the current status of AFP testing by liver cancer screening centers. Proficiency testing was conducted on 400 institutions in 2016 and 200 institutions in 2018.
Results
The average concentration of AFP substances was 9.7–275.5 ng/mL after four assessments for AFP qualitative test kits. Given the cutoff value, only one AFP test reagent showed adequate performance in all cases. In the 2016 survey, 29.2% (75/257 institutions) directly conducted the AFP test and 42.7% (32/75 institutions) conducted a qualitative test. In 2018, 19.4% (27/139 institutions) directly conducted the AFP test and 40.7% (11/27 institutions) conducted a qualitative test. The percentage of institutions conducting AFP qualitative testing that participated in the external quality control program was 37.5% (12/32 institutions) in 2016 and 0% (0/11 institutions) in 2018.
Conclusions
It is necessary for institutions that conduct liver cancer screening using AFP qualitative tests to maintain the performance of reagents through internal and external quality control.

Keyword

Alpha-fetoprotein; Cutoff; Quality control; Qualitative reagent; Proficiency testing

Reference

1. Korean Liver Cancer Association, National Cancer Center. 2019; 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut Liver. 13:227–99. DOI: 10.5009/gnl19024. PMID: 31060120. PMCID: PMC6529163.
2. Ghouri YA, Mian I, Rowe JH. 2017; Review of hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology, etiology, and carcinogenesis. J Carcinog. 16:1. DOI: 10.4103/jcar.JCar_9_16. PMID: 28694740. PMCID: PMC5490340.
Article
3. Bruix J, Sherman M. 2011; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 53:1020–2. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24199. PMID: 21374666. PMCID: PMC3084991.
4. Marrero JA. 2005; Screening tests for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis. 9:235–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2004.12.006. PMID: 15831271.
Article
5. Kokudo N, Takemura N, Hasegawa K, Takayama T, Kubo S, Shimada M, et al. 2019; Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2017 (4th JSH-HCC guidelines) 2019 update. Hepatol Res. 49:1109–13. DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13411. PMID: 31336394.
Article
6. Kim TH, Kim SY, Tang A, Lee JM. 2019; Comparison of international guidelines for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 update. Clin Mol Hepatol. 25:245–63. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2018.0090. PMID: 30759967. PMCID: PMC6759428.
Article
7. Toyoda H, Kumada T, Tada T, Sone Y, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A. 2015; Tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma: simple and significant predictors of outcome in patients with HCC. Liver Cancer. 4:126–36. DOI: 10.1159/000367735. PMID: 26020034. PMCID: PMC4439793.
Article
8. Kudo M, Okanoue T. 2007; Japan Society of Hepatology. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice manual proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology. Oncology. 72 Suppl 1:2–15. DOI: 10.1159/000111702. PMID: 18087177.
9. Kudo M. 2018; Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan as a world-leading model. Liver Cancer. 7:134–47. DOI: 10.1159/000484619. PMID: 29888204. PMCID: PMC5985410.
Article
10. Farinati F, Marino D, De Giorgio M, Baldan A, Cantarini M, Cursaro C, et al. 2006; Diagnostic and prognostic role of alpha-fetoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma: both or neither? Am J Gastroenterol. 101:524–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00443.x. PMID: 16542289.
Article
11. Wong RJ, Ahmed A, Gish RG. 2015; Elevated alpha-fetoprotein: differential diagnosis - hepatocellular carcinoma and other disorders. Clin Liver Dis. 19:309–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.005. PMID: 25921665.
12. Bergstrand CG, Czar B. 1956; Demonstration of a new protein fraction in serum from the human fetus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 8:174. DOI: 10.3109/00365515609049266. PMID: 13351554.
Article
13. Terentiev AA, Moldogazieva NT. 2013; Alpha-fetoprotein: a renaissance. Tumour Biol. 34:2075–91. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-0904-y. PMID: 23765762.
Article
14. Johnson PJ, Williams R. 1980; Serum alpha-fetoprotein estimations and doubling time in hepatocellular carcinoma: influence of therapy and possible value in early detection. J Natl Cancer Inst. 64:1329–32. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/64.6.1329. PMID: 6154822.
Article
15. Sinn DH, Yi J, Choi MS, Kim YJ, Gwak GY, Lee JH, et al. 2015; Serum alpha-fetoprotein may have a significant role in the surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B endemic areas. Hepatogastroenterology. 62:327–32. PMID: 25916058.
16. McMahon BJ, Bulkow L, Harpster A, Snowball M, Lanier A, Sacco F, et al. 2000; Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in Alaska natives infected with chronic hepatitis B: a 16-year population-based study. Hepatology. 32:842–6. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2000.17914. PMID: 11003632.
Article
17. Ko YS, Bae JH, Sinn DH, Gwak GY, Kang W, Paik YH, et al. 2017; The clinical significance of serum alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in a health screening population. Korean J Gastroenterol. 69:232–8. DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2017.69.4.232. PMID: 28449425.
Article
18. Sturgeon CM, Duffy MJ, Stenman UH, Lilja H, Brünner N, Chan DW, et al. 2008; National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. Clin Chem. 54:e11–79. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.105601. PMID: 19042984.
Article
19. Di Bisceglie AM, Sterling RK, Chung RT, Everhart JE, Dienstag JL, Bon-kovsky HL, et al. 2005; Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with advanced hepatitis C: results from the HALT-C Trial. J Hepatol. 43:434–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.03.019. PMID: 16136646.
Article
20. Kanwal F, Singal AG. 2019; Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: current best practice and future direction. Gastroenterology. 157:54–64. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.049. PMID: 30986389. PMCID: PMC6636644.
Article
21. Kim HS, Kim YL, Shim JE. 2016; Annual report on the external quality assessment scheme for immunoassay tests in Korea (2015). J Lab Med Qual Assur. 38:194–213. DOI: 10.15263/jlmqa.2016.38.4.194.
Article
Full Text Links
  • LMO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr