Clin Endosc.  2022 Jan;55(1):95-100. 10.5946/ce.2020.281.

Endoscopic Suturing for the Prevention and Treatment of Complications Associated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Duodenal Adenomas

Affiliations
  • 1Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Background/Aims
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the primary treatment for duodenal adenomas; however, it is associated with a high risk of perforation and bleeding, especially with larger lesions. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic suturing (ES) for the closure of mucosal defects after duodenal EMR.
Methods
Consecutive adult patients who underwent ES of large mucosal defects after EMR of large (>2 cm) duodenal adenomas were retrospectively enrolled. The OverStitch ES system was employed for closing mucosal defects after EMR. Clinical outcomes and complications, including delayed bleeding and perforation, were documented.
Results
During the study period, ES of mucosal defects was performed in seven patients in eight sessions (six for prophylaxis and two for the treatment of perforation). All ES sessions were technically successful. No early or delayed post-EMR bleeding was recorded. In addition, no clinically obvious duodenal stricture or recurrence was encountered on endoscopic follow-up evaluation, and no patients required subsequent surgical intervention.
Conclusions
ES for the prevention and treatment of duodenal perforation after EMR is technically feasible, safe, and effective. ES should be considered an option for preventing or treating perforations associated with EMR of large duodenal adenomas.

Keyword

Duodenal adenoma; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic suturing

Figure

  • Fig. 1. (A) A 30-mm duodenal adenoma located in the junction of the second and third duodenum. (B) After duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection, prophylactic OverStitch endoscopic suturing was performed. (C) One of the three sutures was loose, and duodenal perforation was observed 5 hours later. (D) The second OverStitch endoscopic suturing was performed. (E) The perforation site was closed using three separate OverStitch endoscopic stitches. (F) Fluoroscopy showed no dye leakage through the duodenum.

  • Fig. 2. (A) A 20-mm duodenal adenoma located in the anterior wall of the second part of the duodenum. (B) After duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection. (C) Prophylactic closure was first attempted through endoscopic clip application; however, it failed owing to a large diastasis between the edges and the tangential application. OverStitch endoscopic suturing was then performed with interrupted stitches. (D) The closure of the defect with OverStitch endoscopic suturing.


Reference

1. Jepsen JM, Persson M, Jakobsen NO, et al. Prospective study of prevalence and endoscopic and histopathologic characteristics of duodenal polyps in patients submitted to upper endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994; 29:483–487.
2. Culver EL, McIntyre AS. Sporadic duodenal polyps: classification, investigation, and management. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:144–155.
3. Moss WM, McCart PM, Juler G, Miller DR. Primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum. Arch Surg. 1974; 108:805–807.
4. Spira IA, Ghazi A, Wolff WI. Primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum. Cancer. 1977; 39:1721–1726.
5. Serrano PE, Grant RC, Berk TC, et al. Progression and management of duodenal neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis: a cohort study. Ann Surg. 2015; 261:1138–1144.
6. Groves CJ, Saunders BP, Spigelman AD, Phillips RK. Duodenal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): results of a 10 year prospective study. Gut. 2002; 50:636–641.
7. Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V, Zhu X, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4:E699–E708.
8. Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Quénéhervé L, Margos W, et al. ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2018; 6:E998–E1007.
9. Park SM, Ham JH, Kim BW, et al. Feasibility of endoscopic resection for sessile nonampullary duodenal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015; 2015:692492.
10. Yamamoto H, Miura Y. Duodenal ESD: conquering difficulties. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014; 24:235–244.
11. Podboy A, Friedland S. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West. Int J of Gastrointest Interv. 2019; 8:106–109.
12. Nonaka S, Oda I, Tada K, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic resection for nonampullary duodenal tumors. Endoscopy. 2015; 47:129–135.
13. Inoue T, Uedo N, Yamashina T, et al. Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm. Dig Endosc. 2014; 26:220–227.
14. Fanning SB, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Chung A, Kariyawasam VC. Giant laterally spreading tumors of the duodenum: endoscopic resection outcomes, limitations, and caveats. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:805–812.
15. Matsuda Y, Sakamoto K, Kataoka N, Yamaguchi T, Tomita M, Makimoto S. Perforation associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal neoplasm without a papillary portion. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 9:161–166.
16. Fujihara S, Mori H, Kobara H, et al. Management of a large mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22:6595–6609.
17. Armengol-Miro JR, Dot J, Abu-Suboh Abadia M, et al. New endoscopic suturing device for closure of chronic gastrocutaneous fistula in an immunocompromised patient. Endoscopy. 2011; 43(Suppl 2):E403–E404.
18. Kantsevoy SV, Bitner M. Esophageal stent fixation with endoscopic suturing device (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:1251–1255.
19. Jirapinyo P, Watson RR, Thompson CC. Use of a novel endoscopic suturing device to treat recalcitrant marginal ulceration (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:435–439.
20. Bonin EA, Wong Kee Song LM, Gostout ZS, Bingener J, Gostout CJ. Closure of a persistent esophagopleural fistula assisted by a novel endoscopic suturing system. Endoscopy. 2012; 44(Suppl 2):E8–E9.
21. Alexander S, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Bailey A, Co J. EMR of large, sessile, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas: technical aspects and long-term outcome (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:66–73.
22. Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc. 2009; 21:270–274.
23. Kantsevoy SV, Bitner M, Mitrakov AA, Thuluvath PJ. Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79:503–507.
24. Zorron R, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Adler A, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using Apollo Overstitch as a bridging procedure for superobese and high risk patients. Endoscopy. 2018; 50:81–83.
25. Otake Y, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, et al. New closure technique for large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:663–667.
26. Kantsevoy SV, Thuluvath PJ. Successful closure of a chronic refractory gastrocutaneous fistula with a new endoscopic suturing device (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:688–690.
27. Liaquat H, Rohn E, Rex DK. Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77:401–407.
28. Matsuda T, Fujii T, Emura F, et al. Complete closure of a large defect after EMR of a lateral spreading colorectal tumor when using a two-channel colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60:836–838.
29. Sakamoto N, Beppu K, Matsumoto K, et al. “Loop Clip”, a new closure device for large mucosal defects after EMR and ESD. Endoscopy. 2008; 40(Suppl 2):E97–E98.
30. Fujii T, Ono A, Fu KI. A novel endoscopic suturing technique using a specially designed so-called “8-ring” in combination with resolution clips (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:1215–1220.
31. Fukuhara S, Kato M, Iwasaki E, et al. Management of perforation related to endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91:1129–1137.
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr